![]() |
Did somebody actually just say "show me some peer reviewed studies"? lolol, reminds me of some of the cringe worthy Reddit arguments I've seen in the past. Are there even any "peer reviewed studies" in aviation at all, on any subject? I mean, if so please direct me to that scientific journal, I'd like to subscribe. lol
Look, it's not that difficult. The simple time tested adage applies here: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Fact is that there is no denying that safety in the Part 121 passenger world has increased dramatically since the passing of the requirement. Whether if it was directly related to that or not, who cares? If it ain't broke, don't fix it. |
Stop inventing
|
|
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3479068)
|
Originally Posted by ninerdriver
(Post 3479488)
Regional airlines dispute claim that the regional model is failing. Surprise!
|
Many of the regionals have huge training delays for new FO’s. Wait months for a class date, then wait for simulators, then wait for IOE. I don’t buy the argument when their waiting lists for training are filled with qualified pilots.
I think it’s more about being able to hang on to pilots longer before they become competitive for the majors. |
SonicManagement is right, we should eliminate all burdensome regulations in the aviation sector. Let’s start with the one that dictates single engine climb performance for 121 aircraft. And let’s turn up those 5G cell towers to full blast too. Just think how much money Boeing and Airbus could save if they didn’t have to deal with all that. I’m sure Capitalism will keep me safe.
|
Regardless of whether or not someone believes the 1500 hour rule is correlated to safety or not. One thing I believe is the 1500 hour rule has improved is pilot pay, especially at the regionals. People want to come onboard with the ink still wet on their commercial cert and make $50+ an hour to fly a jet. Do away with that and you could bet on it regionals are going to try and start racing to the basement on pay rates. Gotta pay to attract pilots right now, flood the market with inexperienced pilots and we’ll be on the road back to $19/hr first year.
|
Originally Posted by Gspeed
(Post 3482103)
we should eliminate all burdensome regulations in the aviation sector. Let’s start with the one that dictates single engine climb performance for 121 aircraft. And let’s turn up those 5G cell towers to full blast too. Just think how much money Boeing and Airbus could save if they didn’t have to deal with all that. I’m sure Capitalism will keep me safe.
|
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3477441)
This has been explained multiple times, the 1500 hour rule had nothing to do with safety, it had to do with Obama giving a political favor to the unions. The Part 117 rest rules and training emphasis on stall prevention and recovery that came out of Colgan were absolutely 100% safety related and a good thing. But the 1500 hour rule had nothing to do with safety. Anyone who can think their way out of a wet paper sack can understand this.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:49 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands