Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Bad day at BOS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2007 | 11:49 AM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default 250 wonder pilot?

The 250hr wonder pilot argument doesn't hold water at Eagle. The captain is most likely a former TWA captain with a bizilian hours and the F.O. has been siting over on the right flipping the gear switch for 8 years.

I'de say from the look of things, there was some mechanical problem. through the whole series of photos, the gear doors don't move. If the gear was cycles late, you would think you would see the gear start to peak out on the go-around.

My .02, don't know ERJ systems.

Seneca driver
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 12:44 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by stewie
Dont like to speculate or place blame, but... if this were pilot error it wouldn't surprise me with all the 250 hour wonders being hired at almost every single regional around. I don't care how good and experienced the captain is, if you have an FO that can barely find his own seat, something like this is bound to happen. This goes with the captains, too... what right does a 1500 hr. seminole instructor have to be in command of a turboprop/jet?

I haven't heard any rumors about this incident nor am I trying to start any, i'm just saying that a lot worse is in the future if the current hiring scheme keeps going on...
The fact that you used the term "pilot error" confirms that you probably don't know too much about what is being discussed.
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 12:47 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by Ewfflyer
Pretty good pic's for someone randomly just watching. For the ERJ guys, is there any way the gear doors can drop w/o the gear coming out? It was hard to tell, but it almost looked as if the main's were maybe 6" extended, but that's all I could really see.

Just remember, the media will always use their standard storylines when it comes to aviation, just to spice it up regardless of the situation.

To answer your question, yes, there are circumstances where the gear doors can drop without the gear coming out.

However, if in the above scenario, you would have A LOT more indications that there was something SERIOUSLY wrong with the aircraft. Not just a disagreement with the LG sensor, or whatever happeened to these guys.
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 01:37 PM
  #34  
UnlimitedAkro's Avatar
Gets ALL Days Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
From: Sit down comedian.
Default

Originally Posted by stewie
Dont like to speculate or place blame, but... if this were pilot error it wouldn't surprise me with all the 250 hour wonders being hired at almost every single regional around. I don't care how good and experienced the captain is, if you have an FO that can barely find his own seat, something like this is bound to happen. This goes with the captains, too... what right does a 1500 hr. seminole instructor have to be in command of a turboprop/jet?


I haven't heard any rumors about this incident nor am I trying to start any, i'm just saying that a lot worse is in the future if the current hiring scheme keeps going on...
250 hour wonders? The FO's cant find their own seats? And finally, you havent heard any rumors about this incident and basically you dont know anything about so what the hell are you doing even talking about it.

I dont use this word unless it is completely neccessary... but in this case it is...

DUMBASS!!!!

You my friend know nothing of what you are talking about so go post somewhere else.

The 2 main facts here are:

1. The gear was indicating 3 green lights and no one knows how this happened, not even EMB.

2. The pilots did a damn good job. This could have been a terrible accident and my hats are off to the two pilots.

FOX news has already recieved several phone calls for mis-reporting the facts on this story, and who ever the aviation expert was is a mystery to me, but obviously he is no expert.
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 01:42 PM
  #35  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Originally Posted by stewie
Military training vs. sub-par commuter training... is it even legal to compare the two? This subject needs to be beaten some more because when airlines have to replace crews because neither pilot has 50 hrs. in the airplane, something bad will happen eventually. Are you fighting this subject so harshly because you are one of them in the right seat of an RJ having to deal with all the ****ed off captains that don't want to teach you how to talk on the radio?
I love it, "Sub-Par" commuter training, guess what genius, it was the Sub-Bar Eagle training department that may have helped these pilots as well as the hardover they had a few years back get the airplane back on the ground in one piece.................get a clue.............
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 02:55 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Joe84
I know I'm a little late in my reply. But if you have correct crosswind correction you won't slide off the runway, I've seen it done (granted in a GA plane). I just see It as a much greater risk going around after impacted the ground and scraping the belly.
I have to agree with your comments here. I honestly don't know what I would actually do in a similar situation, but I think that the safest bet would have been to stay on the ground here...at least you know what you have when you are on the ground, and the crash crew is very near-by in case things go badly. Taking an aircraft with unknown damage into the air is not the best option in my mind. What happens if there is structural damage severe enough to cause inability to fly issues at 6000 feet after the go-around? A lawn dart crash is going to be far less survivable than a belly landing. I wasn't there, and I applaud the crew for bringing it back safely, but in the end, even though it all worked out, it doesn't necessarliy mean that it was the safest call.
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 03:46 PM
  #37  
Illini's Avatar
Piper Commander
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ewfflyer
Pretty good pic's for someone randomly just watching. For the ERJ guys, is there any way the gear doors can drop w/o the gear coming out? It was hard to tell, but it almost looked as if the main's were maybe 6" extended, but that's all I could really see.

Just remember, the media will always use their standard storylines when it comes to aviation, just to spice it up regardless of the situation.
If my University's system class was right, the doors are held up hydraulically. But, if they had a loss of hydraulic pressure, then the ailerons and rudder wouldn't function. I don't this was the issue.
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 03:47 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Originally Posted by Illini
If my University's system class was right, the doors are held up hydraulically. But, if they had a loss of hydraulic pressure, then the ailerons and rudder wouldn't function. I don't this was the issue.
yes they would have, they just would have been a lot harder to manipulate
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 03:49 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by Illini
If my University's system class was right, the doors are held up hydraulically. But, if they had a loss of hydraulic pressure, then the ailerons and rudder wouldn't function. I don't this was the issue.
Thats what I was talking about. The gear doors, not the flight controls. And like I said, they would have known about it WAY prior to the before landing check and verifying the gear was down and locked.
Reply
Old 06-25-2007 | 03:53 PM
  #40  
UnlimitedAkro's Avatar
Gets ALL Days Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
From: Sit down comedian.
Default

Originally Posted by Illini
If my University's system class was right, the doors are held up hydraulically. But, if they had a loss of hydraulic pressure, then the ailerons and rudder wouldn't function. I don't this was the issue.
the flight controls on the Emb have mechanical backups (cables and pulleys like a cessna).... they'll still work... its just a little "harder" to fly.

But I dont think anyone would just lose all their hydraulics and come on in and land like nothing happen.

This incident is some kind of computer error and we wont know what happened until the investigation is done. No more speculating.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Captain Monkey Suit
Atlas/Polar
72
01-06-2010 04:08 PM
otter
Hiring News
10
07-22-2007 08:54 AM
Busdriver
JetBlue
70
01-16-2006 10:32 PM
KiloAlpha
Hangar Talk
1
12-21-2005 07:57 PM
Gordon C
Major
10
06-06-2005 12:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices