Bad day at BOS
#41
ATTENTION ALL AMERICAN EAGLE PILOTS:
RE: FLIGHT 4539/20 JUNE YYZ-BOS
FLIGHT 4539 ENCOUNTERED SOME DIFFICULTIES TODAY
DURING THEIR INITIAL LANDING ATTEMPT. THE CREW
ELECTED TO GO-AROUND AND LANDED SUCESSFULLY ON
THEIR SECOND ATTEMPT. THE AIRCRAFT WAS STOPPED ON
THE RUNWAY AND ALL PAX AND CREW MEMBERS DEPLANED
WITHOUT ANY INJURIES. THE AIRCRAFT DID SUSTAIN
SOME DAMAGE TO THE FLAPS AND BELLY PANEL. WE ARE
INVESTIGATING THE EVENT, IN COOPERATION WITH ALL
AUTHORITIES, AND WILL KEEP YOU UPDATED AS WE KNOW
MORE.
THANKS FOR YOUR PROFESSIONALISM, AND FLY SAFE
JIM WINKLEY
...
ATTENTION ALL AMERICAN EAGLE PILOTS
RE: UPDATE ON YYZ-BOS FLIGHT
I WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON THE LATEST
DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING THE INCIDENT THAT OCCURRED WITH
ONE OF OUR FLIGHTS IN BOSTON. AS MANY ARE PROBABLY AWARE,
FOOTAGE IS AVAILABLE DEPICTICTING THE AIRCRAFT CONTACTING
THE GROUND WITH THE LANDING GEAR RETRACTED. A TEAM
COMPRISED OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM AE, EMBRAER, THE NTSB AND
THE FAA HAVE CONDUCTED TESTS ON THE AIRCRAFT TO DETERMINE IF
ANY MECHANICAL DISCREPANCIES COULD BE FOUND. INITIAL RESULTS
INDICATE A POSSIBLE FAILURE OF A LANDING GEAR COMPONENT THAT
MAY HAVE GIVEN FALSE INDICATIONS TO THE PILOTS THAT THE
LANDING GEAR WAS DOWN AND LOCKED PRIOR TO LANDING. WE WILL
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAILS AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE.
THANKS FOR YOUR CONTINUED PROFESSIONALISM, AND FLY SAFE.
JIM WINKLEY
...
TO: ALL EMB PILOTS
FROM: CAPTAIN JEFF HOLT, DIRECTOR FLIGHT OPS TECHNICAL
CAPTAIN MARK BROWN, MANAGER OF FLIGHT SAFETY
DATE: THURSDAY, JUNE 21, 2007
RE: LG/LEVER DISAGREE EICAS MESSAGE
************************************************** **********
FLIGHT OPERATIONS AND FLIGHT SAFETY CONTINUE TO WORK WITH
ALL PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE INVESTIGATION OF THE INCIDENT
THAT OCCURRED IN BOS ON JUNE 20.
.
IN THE MEANTIME, THE FOLLOWING GUIDANCE HAS BEEN ISSUED AS
A F4 SAFETY MESSAGE ON ALL EMB RELEASES:
.
WHENEVER THE EICAS WARNING LG/LEVER DISAGREE MESSAGE IS
PRESENTED AFTER GEAR EXTENSION, THE LANDING GEAR SHOULD
BE CONSIDERED UNSAFE, REGARDLESS OF GEAR POSITION
INDICATIONS ON THE EICAS OR RMU. AN IMMEDIATE GO AROUND
MUST BE INITIATED, AND THE EMERG/ABNORM PROCEDURE
LG/ LEVER DISAGREE MUST BE FOLLOWED.
...
While Eagle can't say what the problem was until the NTSB makes a determination, it seems plausable to presume from these messages that it was mechanical, and not a crew issue.
SAABaroowski, has Xjet published a similar safety of flight advisory?
RE: FLIGHT 4539/20 JUNE YYZ-BOS
FLIGHT 4539 ENCOUNTERED SOME DIFFICULTIES TODAY
DURING THEIR INITIAL LANDING ATTEMPT. THE CREW
ELECTED TO GO-AROUND AND LANDED SUCESSFULLY ON
THEIR SECOND ATTEMPT. THE AIRCRAFT WAS STOPPED ON
THE RUNWAY AND ALL PAX AND CREW MEMBERS DEPLANED
WITHOUT ANY INJURIES. THE AIRCRAFT DID SUSTAIN
SOME DAMAGE TO THE FLAPS AND BELLY PANEL. WE ARE
INVESTIGATING THE EVENT, IN COOPERATION WITH ALL
AUTHORITIES, AND WILL KEEP YOU UPDATED AS WE KNOW
MORE.
THANKS FOR YOUR PROFESSIONALISM, AND FLY SAFE
JIM WINKLEY
...
ATTENTION ALL AMERICAN EAGLE PILOTS
RE: UPDATE ON YYZ-BOS FLIGHT
I WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON THE LATEST
DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING THE INCIDENT THAT OCCURRED WITH
ONE OF OUR FLIGHTS IN BOSTON. AS MANY ARE PROBABLY AWARE,
FOOTAGE IS AVAILABLE DEPICTICTING THE AIRCRAFT CONTACTING
THE GROUND WITH THE LANDING GEAR RETRACTED. A TEAM
COMPRISED OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM AE, EMBRAER, THE NTSB AND
THE FAA HAVE CONDUCTED TESTS ON THE AIRCRAFT TO DETERMINE IF
ANY MECHANICAL DISCREPANCIES COULD BE FOUND. INITIAL RESULTS
INDICATE A POSSIBLE FAILURE OF A LANDING GEAR COMPONENT THAT
MAY HAVE GIVEN FALSE INDICATIONS TO THE PILOTS THAT THE
LANDING GEAR WAS DOWN AND LOCKED PRIOR TO LANDING. WE WILL
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAILS AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE.
THANKS FOR YOUR CONTINUED PROFESSIONALISM, AND FLY SAFE.
JIM WINKLEY
...
TO: ALL EMB PILOTS
FROM: CAPTAIN JEFF HOLT, DIRECTOR FLIGHT OPS TECHNICAL
CAPTAIN MARK BROWN, MANAGER OF FLIGHT SAFETY
DATE: THURSDAY, JUNE 21, 2007
RE: LG/LEVER DISAGREE EICAS MESSAGE
************************************************** **********
FLIGHT OPERATIONS AND FLIGHT SAFETY CONTINUE TO WORK WITH
ALL PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE INVESTIGATION OF THE INCIDENT
THAT OCCURRED IN BOS ON JUNE 20.
.
IN THE MEANTIME, THE FOLLOWING GUIDANCE HAS BEEN ISSUED AS
A F4 SAFETY MESSAGE ON ALL EMB RELEASES:
.
WHENEVER THE EICAS WARNING LG/LEVER DISAGREE MESSAGE IS
PRESENTED AFTER GEAR EXTENSION, THE LANDING GEAR SHOULD
BE CONSIDERED UNSAFE, REGARDLESS OF GEAR POSITION
INDICATIONS ON THE EICAS OR RMU. AN IMMEDIATE GO AROUND
MUST BE INITIATED, AND THE EMERG/ABNORM PROCEDURE
LG/ LEVER DISAGREE MUST BE FOLLOWED.
...
While Eagle can't say what the problem was until the NTSB makes a determination, it seems plausable to presume from these messages that it was mechanical, and not a crew issue.
SAABaroowski, has Xjet published a similar safety of flight advisory?
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Right seat, left seat, right seat, left seat....?
I've been flying the aircraft for nine months so I might not know that much about it. In the video, the nose landing gear door is open but the nlg remains retracted. If the crew were to forget to put the landing gear lever down and then remember at the last second and then place the gear lever down, then the nlg would have tried to extend and that would have been obvious in the video. What the video showed is the nlg door open and the nlg retracted.
The EMB landing gear lever is only an electrical switch. The switch is either up or down. With no malfunctions, the nose landing gear doors won't open unless the landing gear lever was placed in the down position.
I've read in a different thread ("Eagle Gear Problems") on this forum that the problem was replicated while the aircraft was on jacks. This is unconfirmed though.
The EMB landing gear lever is only an electrical switch. The switch is either up or down. With no malfunctions, the nose landing gear doors won't open unless the landing gear lever was placed in the down position.
I've read in a different thread ("Eagle Gear Problems") on this forum that the problem was replicated while the aircraft was on jacks. This is unconfirmed though.
#44
Military training vs. sub-par commuter training... is it even legal to compare the two? This subject needs to be beaten some more because when airlines have to replace crews because neither pilot has 50 hrs. in the airplane, something bad will happen eventually. Are you fighting this subject so harshly because you are one of them in the right seat of an RJ having to deal with all the ****ed off captains that don't want to teach you how to talk on the radio?
#45
There was no info. at all posted about this incident being mechanical or not previous to my last post. It seems now to be absolutely mechanical and the pilots should be applauded for the way they handled the incident. How many of us would have been alert enough to go around when expecting nothing bad was happening and end the flight with very minimal damage to the A/C? My apologies to any of you out there that think I was accusing the crew of pilot error, I wasn't.
*All i'm saying is that a few of these very inexperienced pilots being hired at regionals everywhere will show up on the news very soon!*
*All i'm saying is that a few of these very inexperienced pilots being hired at regionals everywhere will show up on the news very soon!*
#46
There was no info. at all posted about this incident being mechanical or not previous to my last post. It seems now to be absolutely mechanical and the pilots should be applauded for the way they handled the incident. How many of us would have been alert enough to go around when expecting nothing bad was happening and end the flight with very minimal damage to the A/C? My apologies to any of you out there that think I was accusing the crew of pilot error, I wasn't.
*All i'm saying is that a few of these very inexperienced pilots being hired at regionals everywhere will show up on the news very soon!*
*All i'm saying is that a few of these very inexperienced pilots being hired at regionals everywhere will show up on the news very soon!*
Just Go Away already.....
#48
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
RobThree, you might not want to post confidential e-mails we receive about company business. Especially those e-mails which have a manager's name and content about an ongoing incident investigation. The general public is not privy to this info and can only be viewed by logging on to SABRE.
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
There was no info. at all posted about this incident being mechanical or not previous to my last post. It seems now to be absolutely mechanical and the pilots should be applauded for the way they handled the incident. How many of us would have been alert enough to go around when expecting nothing bad was happening and end the flight with very minimal damage to the A/C? My apologies to any of you out there that think I was accusing the crew of pilot error, I wasn't.
*All i'm saying is that a few of these very inexperienced pilots being hired at regionals everywhere will show up on the news very soon!*
*All i'm saying is that a few of these very inexperienced pilots being hired at regionals everywhere will show up on the news very soon!*
Like I said, the fact that you used the term "pilot error", as well as what I said in the above confirms you probably don't know too much about 121 flying.
#50
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



