Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Regional pilot numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2023 | 04:17 AM
  #91  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 475
Likes: 5
Default

That forbes article fails to mention contracts generally go to the lowest bidder, an arguably more exacting reason why regionals have needed to keep costs low.
Reply
Old 03-02-2023 | 05:51 AM
  #92  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,248
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Round Luggage
That forbes article fails to mention contracts generally go to the lowest bidder, an arguably more exacting reason why regionals have needed to keep costs low.
Money is fungible but economics aren’t. If your CASM is too high because of fuel burn or maintenance costs or personnel costs or anything else, it’s still just too high. Plus, short haul routes have other problems. If I have to be at the airport two and a half hours before scheduled takeoff to park and go through security for a scheduled 150 mile trip, I can probably just take a bus and beat the time. Or AMTRAK in the northeast corridor.

And the arrival of fuel efficient narrow bodies capable of long haul will affect regionals too. With a 737 MAX 7 or an A220 or A320 NEO XR flying “thin” long routes point to point, hubs and regional feed may well be less important. The fact is that regionals exist because the legacies figured they could make money off them. That is less and less the case.
Reply
Old 03-02-2023 | 06:22 AM
  #93  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Ravenwing
Endeavor still flies CRJ 200s, I can see those being parked as Endeavor shrinks.
And not a day too soon.
Reply
Old 03-02-2023 | 06:29 AM
  #94  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Ravenwing
The 50 seaters are primarily being operated for United—Air Wisconsin, GoJet, and Commutair—and United seems to be willing to subsidize the increased labor costs at least short term. They even bailed out Mesa. Perhaps United is trying to keep them going for a couple more years until they can cover the flying themselves?

Piedmont operates 50 seaters and is unlikely to fail with AA subsidizing them and relying on their feed. Although Envoy is slowly parking their E145s and transferring some to Piedmont, so it could happen—when AA is ready.

Endeavor still flies CRJ 200s, I can see those being parked as Endeavor shrinks. SkyWest still flies CRJ 200s, not sure for which partners, but they are big enough to survive when no one wants to fly on the 200s anymore. Mandatory upgrades don’t seem to have helped them. It will be interesting to watch what happens.
EDV CRJ200s are done in may I think. Displacement to close the final base is already in process.
Reply
Old 03-02-2023 | 07:25 AM
  #95  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by PilotBases
EDV CRJ200s are done in may I think. Displacement to close the final base is already in process.
I celebrate each regional ramp down of the CRJ200s and E145s.
Reply
Old 03-05-2023 | 05:09 AM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PilotBases
EDV CRJ200s are done in may I think. Displacement to close the final base is already in process.
They will all be parked by June.
Reply
Old 03-05-2023 | 06:28 AM
  #97  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,248
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Green Needles
They will all be parked by June.
And yet people applying to other regionals - and lifers at those regionals - believe that they can keep flying their CRJ-200s and Emb-145s into the sunset.

What’s not cost effective for Endeavour is highly unlikely to be significantly more cost effective for anyone else.
Reply
Old 03-05-2023 | 08:38 AM
  #98  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
And yet people applying to other regionals - and lifers at those regionals - believe that they can keep flying their CRJ-200s and Emb-145s into the sunset.

What’s not cost effective for Endeavour is highly unlikely to be significantly more cost effective for anyone else.
I think the issue is staffing, not cost effectiveness.

Oil's around $80, 50-seaters are paid off, and ticket prices are sky-high. You *should* be able to make money on the right routes, if you can find anyone to fly the things. If you're a senior lifer at a regional with 50's only, you might be willing to stay and do it. They have to find you an FO though...
Reply
Old 03-05-2023 | 10:07 AM
  #99  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 475
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Money is fungible but economics aren’t.
Plus, short haul routes have other problems. If I have to be at the airport two and a half hours before scheduled takeoff to park and go through security for a scheduled 150 mile trip, I can probably just take a bus and beat the time.
Fungibility is an economics term so I don’t know what you are saying here. To the second part you do know that people are traveling 150 or less to a hub by air are connecting to/from somewhere else so that really isn’t an argument. Instead of saying the CASM is high, prove the CASM is relatively high.
Reply
Old 03-05-2023 | 10:35 AM
  #100  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,248
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I think the issue is staffing, not cost effectiveness.

Oil's around $80, 50-seaters are paid off, and ticket prices are sky-high. You *should* be able to make money on the right routes, if you can find anyone to fly the things. If you're a senior lifer at a regional with 50's only, you might be willing to stay and do it. They have to find you an FO though...
Staffing is part of cost effectiveness.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iFlyRC
Mesa Airlines
6904
10-23-2020 04:15 AM
tom11011
Regional
91
09-15-2014 10:46 AM
AFPirate
Regional
6
11-26-2007 11:39 AM
ryane946
Major
12
10-09-2006 05:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices