Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Compass Contract Highlights >

Compass Contract Highlights

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Compass Contract Highlights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2007 | 10:05 AM
  #11  
G-Dog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: ERJ 170
Default

Pay is crap. They get away with it cause they know people will go for instant seniority. I was hoping to see something better so we at RAH have something to work off of. I guess we will have to do it on our own and raise the bar ourselves.
Reply
Old 07-31-2007 | 10:58 AM
  #12  
Rightseat Ballast's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: E170/175 CA
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
It's also why I think the present standard of "more pay for more seats" is broken. Pilots need to understand that we all do the same job, regardless of the size of the aircraft. Rather than pay based on equipment, I personally think that pay should be based on experience and longevity. But you'll never see enough pilots agree on this to make a movement, and management would never sign off on the idea.
While I agree, I think you lose sight of the fact that airline pay is very limited by revenue generated on a particular aircraft. Small airliners such as 1900's, Dashes, SAABs, and 50-seat RJs will only ever generate small levels of revenue, and those pilots will only ever be able to justify small wages. The only way to offset this low wage (given the responsibility that even a small airliner pilot has) is having the prospect of earning higher wages, which can only be paid for by higher revenues, which can only be generated by more seats in the current US market. I believe the flat wage regardless of aircraft idea would work well in the bizjet world, where costs are more accurately passed to the clients, and revenue generation does not rely on passengers boarded but rather on hours flown.
Reply
Old 07-31-2007 | 01:10 PM
  #13  
CoATP's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: CRJ 200, CRJ900 CA
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
I don't have the language, but I think that it means that once you hit 100hrs, you can't pick up any additional flying.
Not the issue. Does it mean they cannot assign it (JM, EXT, TRNG?) Considering current staffing lines would be about 90 hours + WX + fine ramp service + JM will peak higher than 100. Does it mean you can go home on the 28th or just work for free?
Reply
Old 07-31-2007 | 01:27 PM
  #14  
FlyerJosh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 0
From: Executive Transport Driver
Default

Originally Posted by Rightseat Ballast
While I agree, I think you lose sight of the fact that airline pay is very limited by revenue generated on a particular aircraft. Small airliners such as 1900's, Dashes, SAABs, and 50-seat RJs will only ever generate small levels of revenue, and those pilots will only ever be able to justify small wages. The only way to offset this low wage (given the responsibility that even a small airliner pilot has) is having the prospect of earning higher wages, which can only be paid for by higher revenues, which can only be generated by more seats in the current US market. I believe the flat wage regardless of aircraft idea would work well in the bizjet world, where costs are more accurately passed to the clients, and revenue generation does not rely on passengers boarded but rather on hours flown.
Not to take things off topic, but that's BS. I don't think that there's a way that anybody can quantify what a 1900/Saab/Dash/CRJ makes in the big scheme of things.

Saying otherwise is just like saying that corporate jets don't make any money for companies. Why then can they be justified?

It's easy to say that regional aircraft only offer "small revenues" when compared to their "bigger brethren". However, in today's economy of scale and interconnected web of regional flights to international flights, it's impossible to tell exactly how much of an impact such flying has on it's parent. (The last time that any data might have been collected on this issue is during the Comair strike/shutdown).

Regional pilots sell themselves out anytime that they repeat the mantra of "we only carry so much revenue." Like I said, it will never happen on a national scale, but it requires the understanding that rather than having the "possibility of better QOL/Pay" for a small group of individuals that reach the pinnacle of the career, it's better for everybody to see the median wage increase, while the range of salaries (both low and high) moves towards the center. (IE regional pilots are paid more, while career major pilots are paid less in the end). The result would be a more even career progression, that could be based less on seniority and equipment and more on experience and longevity.

But like I said, it won't ever happen. (Unfortunately)
Reply
Old 08-14-2007 | 03:23 PM
  #15  
atpcliff's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,215
Likes: 0
From: Capt
Default

Hi!

The contract says "max credit" of 100 hours, so that means that no matter how much pay credit you build up, you'll only get paid for 100 hours.

That sux!

Guys at PCL have been scheduled for 98 hours. If Compass gets low on pilots, they will schedule guys for lots of hours, and all that vacation, incentive, and min pay for non-flying duties will go down the toilet.

I could see capping the max credit at some figure, but I would think 150 would be a reasonable number. An ATA check airman got 350 one month-I do think that's excessive.

cliff
YIP
Reply
Old 08-14-2007 | 03:35 PM
  #16  
N2rotation's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: XJT furloughed due to non-ALPA undercutting
Default

Looks a lot like the ExpressJet contract... except XJT only flies 50 seaters!
Reply
Old 08-14-2007 | 04:12 PM
  #17  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 130
Default

Originally Posted by N2rotation
Looks a lot like the ExpressJet contract... except XJT only flies 50 seaters!
It actually looks a lot worse than XJT's contract in many ways.

Originally Posted by G-Dog
Pay is crap. They get away with it cause they know people will go for instant seniority. I was hoping to see something better so we at RAH have something to work off of. I guess we will have to do it on our own and raise the bar ourselves.
Refer to Comair and AWAC 2001 contracts for you to "have something to work off of" in your negotiations as far as payscales for 70+ seats. I have electronic copies of both if you are interested...
Reply
Old 08-14-2007 | 05:16 PM
  #18  
N2rotation's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: XJT furloughed due to non-ALPA undercutting
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
It actually looks a lot worse than XJT's contract in many ways.
Point out the differences, please. Do you fly for ExpressJet?
Reply
Old 08-14-2007 | 05:44 PM
  #19  
Vikz09's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: M88 B
Default

Well NWA's ALPA negotiated the Compass Contract. I don't like the pay rates but it's just another sign of ALPA national letting down there pilot groups. ALPA national had to sign off on this. It still has many benefits over contracts like MESA ,Etc. Yah Air Wisconsin had a nice contract in 2001 but the contract today looks nothing like the old Air willy contact...pay, and QOL issues that resulted from the TA dramatically changed how the company was able to build lines. The company found many loopholes and today a Air Willy pilot (unless hired in the last 3 years) is likely a commuter who spends on average at least 5 nights away from home a week. Truely the only really nice contract in the regional industry from what i see is Horizon. Everyone has a long way to go to make this industry respectable again!!
Reply
Old 08-14-2007 | 05:53 PM
  #20  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 130
Default

Originally Posted by N2rotation
Point out the differences, please. Do you fly for ExpressJet?
No, I work for Air Wisconsin. I've posted the XJT 2004 CBA a few times before, so you can do a search and compare the two for yourself. I'd post it again, but for some reason it won't let me.

My impression of this Compass CBA is that it is very much industry average...which isn't unexpected or saying much. Specifically, I am disappointed with the crappy FO pay, 75% DH, Sick Leave policy, lack of medical reimbursement and 100 hour credit cap. I noticed there is no mention of cancellation pay.

It could have been MUCH worse though...and I'm glad they have an ASAP program out of the box.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DLconnection
Compass Airlines
3
08-01-2008 06:09 AM
FlyerJosh
Compass Airlines
180
12-11-2007 05:03 PM
FlyerJosh
Regional
7
08-02-2007 10:30 AM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
3
08-03-2005 03:19 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-05-2005 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices