Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Mesa Street Capt Mins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2007 | 08:05 AM
  #11  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,144
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Exclamation Self Disclosure!

Originally Posted by waflyboy
Why would Mesa have an interest in reporting violations of their captains?
This question brings up an excellent topic, which is especially applicable to mesa: Self Disclosure!

The concept behind self-disclosure is that when an FAR is violated in 121, the operator and any licensed individuals involved (pilots, dispatchers, mechanics) are jointly liable. The company will get a large fine ($10K for small violations) and the license holders will get suspended or revoked.

Now the FAA clearly understands that essentially all violations are really the fault of the conniving and unethical labor types, and that the honest, upstanding, and law abiding company and managers tried their hardest to prevent any and all violations. Occasionally even the company's great efforts cannot stem the tied of employee malfeasance, and a violation occurs. Since the FAA knows it wasn't really the company's fault, and they don't really want the company to have to pay a fine they allow them a way out: Self Disclosure.

The way this works is that if the company becomes aware of a violation committed by one of their employees, they must RUN (not walk) to the nearest phone and contact the POI...before he finds out about it on his own. If they fullfill their snitch duties, then the company is off the hook for the fine!

Here's one "hypothetical" example of how this works at mesa...the company needs to cover a flight badly (their performance numbers are poor, they need to catch up by month end, and they just can't afford to CANX). Unfortunately, they are out of reserves who are legal for the flight. Crew tracking hand-picks a really new, unexperienced, and not-too-bright reserve FO. They call this fellow up and tell him he has a trip that REALLY needs to get covered. If he bites, fine. If he balks due to duty limits, they will make up some BS about the computer showing he's legal or something like that. Our hero accepts the trip, and violates FAR's. Meanwhile back at the ranch....

- This whole deal was arranged by the manager of CT
- It was executed by a junior crew tracker, using a cell phone (instead of the landlines which are recorded)
- They did NOT enter the FO's trip in the computer...because the computer would flag it red for everybody to see.
- Once the flight completes, THEN they enter the trip, it get's flagged, and the CT manager contacts the CP, who self discloses to the POI.
- The company comes away clean, looking good, with no fine.
- The CT manager has plausible deniability, and saved the performance numbers (and his bonus).
- The junior crew tracker doesn't have a license anyway, so the FAA can't do anything to her.
- The FO gets a letter of investigation from the FAA after ten or more days...naturally the company didn't give him a heads up that they threw him under the bus, and the fed naturally ran out the clock on a nasa form (which probably wouldn't have helped anyway).

This is why you have to track your own flight and duty times...especially at the lower-tier companies. I have a good buddy who got self-disclosed, violated, and fired.

Last edited by rickair7777; 08-02-2007 at 08:14 AM.
Reply
Old 08-02-2007 | 09:41 AM
  #12  
RightSeatDude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Default

Last I heard, we waived ICAO minimums for the Dash 8 operation in JFK. As that operation is being shut down at the end of this month, I'm not sure that would still apply. But think FAA ATP mins for starters, and possibly ICAO minimums.

Originally Posted by waflyboy
Just a curiosity more than anything....

I hear Mesa is hiring CAs off the street... anybody have an idea what their mins for the T-props would be?
Reply
Old 08-02-2007 | 10:12 AM
  #13  
XtremeF150's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: M88B
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
This question brings up an excellent topic, which is especially applicable to mesa: Self Disclosure!

The concept behind self-disclosure is that when an FAR is violated in 121, the operator and any licensed individuals involved (pilots, dispatchers, mechanics) are jointly liable. The company will get a large fine ($10K for small violations) and the license holders will get suspended or revoked.

Now the FAA clearly understands that essentially all violations are really the fault of the conniving and unethical labor types, and that the honest, upstanding, and law abiding company and managers tried their hardest to prevent any and all violations. Occasionally even the company's great efforts cannot stem the tied of employee malfeasance, and a violation occurs. Since the FAA knows it wasn't really the company's fault, and they don't really want the company to have to pay a fine they allow them a way out: Self Disclosure.

The way this works is that if the company becomes aware of a violation committed by one of their employees, they must RUN (not walk) to the nearest phone and contact the POI...before he finds out about it on his own. If they fullfill their snitch duties, then the company is off the hook for the fine!

Here's one "hypothetical" example of how this works at mesa...the company needs to cover a flight badly (their performance numbers are poor, they need to catch up by month end, and they just can't afford to CANX). Unfortunately, they are out of reserves who are legal for the flight. Crew tracking hand-picks a really new, unexperienced, and not-too-bright reserve FO. They call this fellow up and tell him he has a trip that REALLY needs to get covered. If he bites, fine. If he balks due to duty limits, they will make up some BS about the computer showing he's legal or something like that. Our hero accepts the trip, and violates FAR's. Meanwhile back at the ranch....

- This whole deal was arranged by the manager of CT
- It was executed by a junior crew tracker, using a cell phone (instead of the landlines which are recorded)
- They did NOT enter the FO's trip in the computer...because the computer would flag it red for everybody to see.
- Once the flight completes, THEN they enter the trip, it get's flagged, and the CT manager contacts the CP, who self discloses to the POI.
- The company comes away clean, looking good, with no fine.
- The CT manager has plausible deniability, and saved the performance numbers (and his bonus).
- The junior crew tracker doesn't have a license anyway, so the FAA can't do anything to her.
- The FO gets a letter of investigation from the FAA after ten or more days...naturally the company didn't give him a heads up that they threw him under the bus, and the fed naturally ran out the clock on a nasa form (which probably wouldn't have helped anyway).

This is why you have to track your own flight and duty times...especially at the lower-tier companies. I have a good buddy who got self-disclosed, violated, and fired.
Alright, I know many of you read this and said No Way! they would do that...Knowingly...Believe it. The violations get a lot simpler than this one though. Keep in mind that the street CA's only work on the T-props and likely do a lot of RSV work, which means they aren't familiar with the route and also likely have a 250 hour pilot to back them up. (Mesa got in enough trouble they had to raise the green on green to 150 in type). Here are a few that I remember
- It's cold and dark, F.O. does very fast poor walk around and misses something. CA goes down with ship.
- F.O. misses some required placards in the cabin...(Stop shaking your head this really happened and yes the crew got violated)
-15 minute turn on green RSV crew in DFW. Departure not correctly understood or entered and the crew turns the wrong direction after t/o (Remeber 15 minutes is a long turn on one of these a/c)
- In the CA's haste, he is told by MX that the aircraft is ok for return to service and it is signed off. Illegally of course but they didn't want to cnx the flight. The flight goes with paying pax on board. Then lands only to have mx control calling to say oh wait we need to change that write up because actually it isn't legal. And where does that leave the CA.

Always remember that you will have 10 minutes in MOST cases to turn an airplane which includes, looking through the same length release that everyone else gets (8-10 pages at least) to find the mistakes the new dispatchers screwed up on. Get the fuel, bags (which you might help throw), pax on the a/c and briefed, weight and balance done, and many times they will even throw in an a/c swap so you can include preflighting and looking at the books in there too. Now how much time was left to become familiar with that flight plan.

Just don't get out of the gate 1 minute late because then you have to write a email to the regional chief pilot!

So if a couple of you with your 1500 hours that think I am a high time pilot I can handle anything want a stab at that. Go right ahead, that 250 hour guy will back you up and that new dispatcher will help you out. Don't forget to ask yourself one thing though. "Do you feel lucky...well do you punk!"
Sorry had to throw that in there too And Rick is absolutely correct they have the FAA on speed dial. I think they get their jollies from taking down pilots. Thats it for now.

Last edited by XtremeF150; 08-02-2007 at 10:14 AM. Reason: more thoughts
Reply
Old 08-02-2007 | 10:55 AM
  #14  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Are they still charging the $50 application fee?
Reply
Old 08-02-2007 | 10:58 AM
  #15  
RightSeatDude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Default

I seriously doubt it. In fact, now they're covering the hotel from day one. They used to not pay that until you passed the systems exam.

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
Are they still charging the $50 application fee?
Reply
Old 08-02-2007 | 05:34 PM
  #16  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: 737 Right
Default

Thanks Rickair and Xtreme for your valuable info! I was trying to figure out how things could be soooo bad over there. Now I have a better understanding. Sounds like an awful place to work with the deception and what not. Hasn't the FAA caught onto this? Are you telling me that it's better to train a new captain (after reporting a violation on one) than to take the fine?
Reply
Old 08-02-2007 | 07:26 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: DHC-8 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by waflyboy
Thanks Rickair and Xtreme for your valuable info! I was trying to figure out how things could be soooo bad over there. Now I have a better understanding. Sounds like an awful place to work with the deception and what not. Hasn't the FAA caught onto this? Are you telling me that it's better to train a new captain (after reporting a violation on one) than to take the fine?
Lets remember that xtreme flew for air midwest, which is a little different from the rest of the airline.

I am not saying that anything that he said isn't true. But I'll tell you how it is for me on the dash-8 out west.

The captains accomplish the walk around, I believe for the reason that xtreme mentioned: to get a first hand look at the airplane they are about to fly. The captain is also responsible for the FMS, and its operation, thus removing one more way a F/O can "screw him." Both of us review the flight plan on paper and in the box prior to push.

On the dash, (the street captain airframe in question) we have a flight attendant who is responsible for the cabin of the aircraft.

In my almost year of flying the line, I have never seen the release come with in accurate information. Sure, we have had new ones sent to reflect changes in fuel or flight plan, but none with blatantly wrong info on it.

My sim partner was a 250-hour guy that everyone here enjoys ripping on. He was sharp in training, in the sim, and quickly became one of the best, and most well liked F/O's at the airline. The other 4 guys in my class who were of the same background are no different.

I have met pilots at other airlines who have zero personality and have their heads so far up their asses I'm amazed they can safely fly an airplane. I wouldn't trust some of them to fly the blender I sent my grandmother last X-mas, and these guys have 1000's of hours.

I guess it depends on the individual, and not the hours.
Reply
Old 08-02-2007 | 08:33 PM
  #18  
XtremeF150's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: M88B
Default

There are plenty of threads in the past year or so that have refered to the problems with street CA jobs at Mesa so I won't go into it too much more, but the hour thing tends to bug me too. I think the real problem with a 250 hour pilot is how arrogant they seem to be. They think they are ready for the shuttle or something and it really gets under my skin. I still consider myself low time and I have well over the mins for major carrier I can think of. I attending sim training right now for another a/c but I think I am the most cautious person in the class. I am not in the business of telling the guy sitting next to me that has 5 or 6 types and 10,000 hours how he doesn't know how to fly. Regardless of what many might think experience although not ALWAYS right usually wins over youthful arrogance. That includes 1500 hour street CA's.
In concluion if you are going to take that route you would be best suited to bow your head and take all the advice you can get and plan on studying as if your life depended on it.
Regardless of what other new guys that like to say they have been flying at Mesa for a while and know what goes on over there like to post, I KNOW that almost 33% of the CA's I worked with recieved violations. That doesn't mean they aren't flying today, just that they don't have clean tickets anymore. I don't think anyone is above these problems. I am greatful that I didn't caught in any of those problems in my stay with the company.

The final thought I leave you with is when you have finished researching this on the other threads that discuss it and consider yourself informed, just STOP.....and think why a company the size of Mesa that has been around for 25 years should have to hire street CA's? I think you know the answer.

Oh and sorry for the typing and grammar...I just fly airplanes
Reply
Old 08-02-2007 | 08:44 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by XtremeF150
There are plenty of threads in the past year or so that have refered to the problems with street CA jobs at Mesa so I won't go into it too much more, but the hour thing tends to bug me too. I think the real problem with a 250 hour pilot is how arrogant they seem to be. They think they are ready for the shuttle or something and it really gets under my skin. I still consider myself low time and I have well over the mins for major carrier I can think of. I attending sim training right now for another a/c but I think I am the most cautious person in the class. I am not in the business of telling the guy sitting next to me that has 5 or 6 types and 10,000 hours how he doesn't know how to fly. Regardless of what many might think experience although not ALWAYS right usually wins over youthful arrogance. That includes 1500 hour street CA's.
In concluion if you are going to take that route you would be best suited to bow your head and take all the advice you can get and plan on studying as if your life depended on it.
Regardless of what other new guys that like to say they have been flying at Mesa for a while and know what goes on over there like to post, I KNOW that almost 33% of the CA's I worked with recieved violations. That doesn't mean they aren't flying today, just that they don't have clean tickets anymore. I don't think anyone is above these problems. I am greatful that I didn't caught in any of those problems in my stay with the company.

The final thought I leave you with is when you have finished researching this on the other threads that discuss it and consider yourself informed, just STOP.....and think why a company the size of Mesa that has been around for 25 years should have to hire street CA's? I think you know the answer.

Oh and sorry for the typing and grammar...I just fly airplanes
I agree with all of the above. In addition with regards to violations, i have a friend (i went to college with) at the FAA that oversees a very large regional (not Mesa). He tells me that the resent trend with low time hires and 1 year captains is not lost on them. They are watching operations like a hawk and violations/warning letters are up. Specifically, among other issues, ATC is getting tired of baby sitting. Keep your nose clean out there. There have been a lot of problems with the combo of a low time fo and a brand new ca with little experience him/herself.
Reply
Old 08-02-2007 | 08:56 PM
  #20  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,144
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Exclamation

Originally Posted by newgrad411
Lets remember that xtreme flew for air midwest, which is a little different from the rest of the airline.

I am not saying that anything that he said isn't true. But I'll tell you how it is for me on the dash-8 out west.

The captains accomplish the walk around, I believe for the reason that xtreme mentioned: to get a first hand look at the airplane they are about to fly. The captain is also responsible for the FMS, and its operation, thus removing one more way a F/O can "screw him." Both of us review the flight plan on paper and in the box prior to push.

On the dash, (the street captain airframe in question) we have a flight attendant who is responsible for the cabin of the aircraft.

In my almost year of flying the line, I have never seen the release come with in accurate information. Sure, we have had new ones sent to reflect changes in fuel or flight plan, but none with blatantly wrong info on it.

My sim partner was a 250-hour guy that everyone here enjoys ripping on. He was sharp in training, in the sim, and quickly became one of the best, and most well liked F/O's at the airline. The other 4 guys in my class who were of the same background are no different.

I have met pilots at other airlines who have zero personality and have their heads so far up their asses I'm amazed they can safely fly an airplane. I wouldn't trust some of them to fly the blender I sent my grandmother last X-mas, and these guys have 1000's of hours.

I guess it depends on the individual, and not the hours.

I agree that the individual makes a huge difference. But if you and your buds are so hot (not saying that you're not) WHAT THE H*** ARE YOU DOING STILL WORKING FOR ORNSTEIN????

Why are you willing to put up with that crap? Maybe the dash is isolated from the rest of the mess now (I recall a high CANX rate on dash flights), but you still have horrible work rules! Are you going to stick up for yourself next month? If you're going to defend mesa, you'd better be ready to burn it down.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Mesa Airlines
20
12-31-2015 02:43 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
5
06-23-2007 06:45 AM
WatchThis!
Regional
70
03-10-2006 09:27 AM
CRJammin
Cargo
4
09-16-2005 06:18 PM
Sir James
Regional
0
04-26-2005 12:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices