Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Who would you rather fly with... >

Who would you rather fly with...

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Who would you rather fly with...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2007 | 09:40 AM
  #11  
FlyerJosh's Avatar
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 0
From: Executive Transport Driver
Default

Originally Posted by usmc-sgt
1200 hour guy regardless of experience had because even if it is 1200 hours of patrolling a highway or working the pattern in a 152 it is 800 more hours of oppurtunity to use decision making skills and encounter problems that others may have not seen.

Multi is not a designator of pilot skill

1200 hours as a VFR only CFI doing touch and goes for all private pilots, vs a 400 hr pilot that has 200 hrs flying as an SIC on a turbine aircraft can't be compared. A 400 hr UPT candidate is more likely to have a wider variety of experience than a 1200 hr part 91 "podunk" candidate.
While the CFI might have had more opportunity to experience the "unknown", the 400 hr pilot is probably more likely to succeed in a high altitude environment with less supervision.

At the end of the day, 1200 hrs or 400 hrs, they both pass the same checkrides and I'm still the captain. As such, I still anticipate a need (as well as a desire) to mentor/oversee any new first officer. Likewise, I'm not going to shut down an opportunity to learn from another crewmember and utilize the best of their own experiences- regardless of how many hours or the type of experience they may have.

Last edited by FlyerJosh; 10-07-2007 at 09:46 AM.
Reply
Old 10-07-2007 | 09:42 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
1200 hours as a VFR only CFI doing touch and goes for all private pilots, vs a 400 hr pilot that has 200 hrs flying as an SIC on a turbine aircraft can't be combined. A 400 hr UPT candidate is more likely to have a wider variety of experience than a 1200 hr part 91 "podunk" candidate.
While the CFI might have had more opportunity to experience the "unknown", the 400 hr pilot is probably more likely to succeed in a high altitude environment with less supervision.

At the end of the day, 1200 hrs or 400 hrs, they both pass the same checkrides and I'm still the captain. As such, I still anticipate a need (as well as a desire) to mentor/oversee any new first officer. Likewise, I'm not going to shut down an opportunity to learn from another crewmember and utilize the best of their own experiences- regardless of how many hours or the type of experience they may have.

Best response so far............
Reply
Old 10-07-2007 | 11:42 AM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Default

Do the airlines really look at where your time came from or do they just look at how much you have? Just about all of mine is as a CFI doing both touch and goes and also lots of instrument work. My only problem is I'm short on the multi because I haven't had very many multi engine students.
Reply
Old 10-07-2007 | 11:47 AM
  #14  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: DHC-8 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
1200 hours as a VFR only CFI doing touch and goes for all private pilots, vs a 400 hr pilot that has 200 hrs flying as an SIC on a turbine aircraft can't be compared. A 400 hr UPT candidate is more likely to have a wider variety of experience than a 1200 hr part 91 "podunk" candidate.
While the CFI might have had more opportunity to experience the "unknown", the 400 hr pilot is probably more likely to succeed in a high altitude environment with less supervision.

At the end of the day, 1200 hrs or 400 hrs, they both pass the same checkrides and I'm still the captain. As such, I still anticipate a need (as well as a desire) to mentor/oversee any new first officer. Likewise, I'm not going to shut down an opportunity to learn from another crewmember and utilize the best of their own experiences- regardless of how many hours or the type of experience they may have.
Great response. Captains like you are the best out there because you do offer tips/advice and answer questions. Flying with the guys who are quiet all the time, aren't standard, and seem to know little about the airplane, SOP'S and the rules is not a whole lot of fun.
Reply
Old 10-07-2007 | 12:00 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 1
From: 744 CA
Default

I think they absolutely look at where your time comes from.
Reply
Old 10-07-2007 | 12:55 PM
  #16  
andy171773's Avatar
Furlough line holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 0
From: CRJ2, ATR, CRJ7, E145, 737
Default

Originally Posted by HercDriver130
I think they absolutely look at where your time comes from.
Exactly...

An airline is going to favor a 100ME hour MEI who taught engine cuts on takeoff, after liftoff, and full feather shutdowns..over a 100ME hour pilot, who went to florida, rented a plane and did lackadaisical VFR cross countries from Ocala to JAX to the keys for 3 weeks. Not saying that block time is always like that, but let's be real.
Reply
Old 10-07-2007 | 01:31 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: SAABster
Default

Originally Posted by TXTECHKA
1200 hour guy any day

It's not how many hours a pilot flys a twin with both engines running, it's how well he flys a twin with only one engine running! (ie. single engine multi)
Reply
Old 10-07-2007 | 01:37 PM
  #18  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by andy171773
Exactly...

An airline is going to favor a 100ME hour MEI who taught engine cuts on takeoff, after liftoff, and full feather shutdowns..over a 100ME hour pilot, who went to florida, rented a plane and did lackadaisical VFR cross countries from Ocala to JAX to the keys for 3 weeks. Not saying that block time is always like that, but let's be real.

How about a 100 ME hour pilot flying around building time vs a 50 ME hour MEI?
Reply
Old 10-07-2007 | 01:56 PM
  #19  
Aviatormar's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
From: CH2T Worst plane ever
Default

50 hour mei, hands down, I did that route and I can say I was a new 22 hour MEI, I SUCKED at it. My first students where Chinese, they sucked too, pretty scary at times. At 50, I felt good, 100 I could relax and at 150 I started having fun.
Reply
Old 10-07-2007 | 02:32 PM
  #20  
TXTECHKA's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by XJPILOT1
It's not how many hours a pilot flys a twin with both engines running, it's how well he flys a twin with only one engine running! (ie. single engine multi)
You're exactly right but pilots fly planes with both engines running into the ground all the time. That's why I'd take the more experienced guy. Sure experienced pilots get into accidents too, but the 400 hour guy is more dangerous than someone with 1200 hours.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
39
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
hotshot
Hangar Talk
11
09-03-2007 10:38 AM
Joachim
Regional
16
06-28-2007 10:12 PM
FuelJetA
Corporate
0
02-13-2006 04:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices