Who would you rather fly with...
#11
1200 hour guy regardless of experience had because even if it is 1200 hours of patrolling a highway or working the pattern in a 152 it is 800 more hours of oppurtunity to use decision making skills and encounter problems that others may have not seen.
Multi is not a designator of pilot skill
Multi is not a designator of pilot skill
1200 hours as a VFR only CFI doing touch and goes for all private pilots, vs a 400 hr pilot that has 200 hrs flying as an SIC on a turbine aircraft can't be compared. A 400 hr UPT candidate is more likely to have a wider variety of experience than a 1200 hr part 91 "podunk" candidate.
While the CFI might have had more opportunity to experience the "unknown", the 400 hr pilot is probably more likely to succeed in a high altitude environment with less supervision.
At the end of the day, 1200 hrs or 400 hrs, they both pass the same checkrides and I'm still the captain. As such, I still anticipate a need (as well as a desire) to mentor/oversee any new first officer. Likewise, I'm not going to shut down an opportunity to learn from another crewmember and utilize the best of their own experiences- regardless of how many hours or the type of experience they may have.
Last edited by FlyerJosh; 10-07-2007 at 09:46 AM.
#12
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
1200 hours as a VFR only CFI doing touch and goes for all private pilots, vs a 400 hr pilot that has 200 hrs flying as an SIC on a turbine aircraft can't be combined. A 400 hr UPT candidate is more likely to have a wider variety of experience than a 1200 hr part 91 "podunk" candidate.
While the CFI might have had more opportunity to experience the "unknown", the 400 hr pilot is probably more likely to succeed in a high altitude environment with less supervision.
At the end of the day, 1200 hrs or 400 hrs, they both pass the same checkrides and I'm still the captain. As such, I still anticipate a need (as well as a desire) to mentor/oversee any new first officer. Likewise, I'm not going to shut down an opportunity to learn from another crewmember and utilize the best of their own experiences- regardless of how many hours or the type of experience they may have.
While the CFI might have had more opportunity to experience the "unknown", the 400 hr pilot is probably more likely to succeed in a high altitude environment with less supervision.
At the end of the day, 1200 hrs or 400 hrs, they both pass the same checkrides and I'm still the captain. As such, I still anticipate a need (as well as a desire) to mentor/oversee any new first officer. Likewise, I'm not going to shut down an opportunity to learn from another crewmember and utilize the best of their own experiences- regardless of how many hours or the type of experience they may have.
Best response so far............
#13
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Do the airlines really look at where your time came from or do they just look at how much you have? Just about all of mine is as a CFI doing both touch and goes and also lots of instrument work. My only problem is I'm short on the multi because I haven't had very many multi engine students.
#14
Banned
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: DHC-8 F/O
1200 hours as a VFR only CFI doing touch and goes for all private pilots, vs a 400 hr pilot that has 200 hrs flying as an SIC on a turbine aircraft can't be compared. A 400 hr UPT candidate is more likely to have a wider variety of experience than a 1200 hr part 91 "podunk" candidate.
While the CFI might have had more opportunity to experience the "unknown", the 400 hr pilot is probably more likely to succeed in a high altitude environment with less supervision.
At the end of the day, 1200 hrs or 400 hrs, they both pass the same checkrides and I'm still the captain. As such, I still anticipate a need (as well as a desire) to mentor/oversee any new first officer. Likewise, I'm not going to shut down an opportunity to learn from another crewmember and utilize the best of their own experiences- regardless of how many hours or the type of experience they may have.
While the CFI might have had more opportunity to experience the "unknown", the 400 hr pilot is probably more likely to succeed in a high altitude environment with less supervision.
At the end of the day, 1200 hrs or 400 hrs, they both pass the same checkrides and I'm still the captain. As such, I still anticipate a need (as well as a desire) to mentor/oversee any new first officer. Likewise, I'm not going to shut down an opportunity to learn from another crewmember and utilize the best of their own experiences- regardless of how many hours or the type of experience they may have.
#16
Exactly...
An airline is going to favor a 100ME hour MEI who taught engine cuts on takeoff, after liftoff, and full feather shutdowns..over a 100ME hour pilot, who went to florida, rented a plane and did lackadaisical VFR cross countries from Ocala to JAX to the keys for 3 weeks. Not saying that block time is always like that, but let's be real.
An airline is going to favor a 100ME hour MEI who taught engine cuts on takeoff, after liftoff, and full feather shutdowns..over a 100ME hour pilot, who went to florida, rented a plane and did lackadaisical VFR cross countries from Ocala to JAX to the keys for 3 weeks. Not saying that block time is always like that, but let's be real.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: SAABster
#18
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Exactly...
An airline is going to favor a 100ME hour MEI who taught engine cuts on takeoff, after liftoff, and full feather shutdowns..over a 100ME hour pilot, who went to florida, rented a plane and did lackadaisical VFR cross countries from Ocala to JAX to the keys for 3 weeks. Not saying that block time is always like that, but let's be real.
An airline is going to favor a 100ME hour MEI who taught engine cuts on takeoff, after liftoff, and full feather shutdowns..over a 100ME hour pilot, who went to florida, rented a plane and did lackadaisical VFR cross countries from Ocala to JAX to the keys for 3 weeks. Not saying that block time is always like that, but let's be real.
How about a 100 ME hour pilot flying around building time vs a 50 ME hour MEI?
#19
50 hour mei, hands down, I did that route and I can say I was a new 22 hour MEI, I SUCKED at it. My first students where Chinese, they sucked too, pretty scary at times. At 50, I felt good, 100 I could relax and at 150 I started having fun.
#20
You're exactly right but pilots fly planes with both engines running into the ground all the time. That's why I'd take the more experienced guy. Sure experienced pilots get into accidents too, but the 400 hour guy is more dangerous than someone with 1200 hours.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
39
12-05-2012 08:29 AM



