Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Lynx Aviation News... :-( >

Lynx Aviation News... :-(


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Lynx Aviation News... :-(

Old 01-13-2008 | 07:17 AM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 12
Default

No one would be upset if:

Skybus was not growing
Virgin America was not growing
Mesa was not growing
Gojet was not growing

So why would you be upset when Lynx is not growing?

I would rather see a quality regional get their flying. That is definately not Lynx.
Reply
Old 01-13-2008 | 09:34 AM
  #12  
dolsanddays's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Keep on Truckin'
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
No one would be upset if:

Skybus was not growing
Virgin America was not growing
Mesa was not growing
Gojet was not growing

So why would you be upset when Lynx is not growing?

I would rather see a quality regional get their flying. That is definately not Lynx.
I'm pretty sure you don't know the first thing about Lynx. How can you judge quality on something that has been flying for less than 2 months. While there has been some huge miscalculations in budgeting and planning, I truly believe that most of the Lynx management acts in the good faith towards its employees. They seem to be aware that the works rules and pay rates are unacceptable. They don't seem interested in watching a large number of their pilots (who were trained on entitlements from Bombardier) walk out the door. They know unhappy people will cost them big $$ in the long run. Well at least I hope they know.
Reply
Old 01-13-2008 | 12:19 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Just to note, everyone I've talked to hasn't heard a thing about this, so I'm going to save my jugement until I heard something official. Nunn was quoted in the paper saying they would decide in the next few months whether they want the options and I'd go with that.
Reply
Old 01-13-2008 | 12:30 PM
  #14  
dolsanddays's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Keep on Truckin'
Default

Originally Posted by TheGreatChecko
Just to note, everyone I've talked to hasn't heard a thing about this, so I'm going to save my jugement until I heard something official. Nunn was quoted in the paper saying they would decide in the next few months whether they want the options and I'd go with that.
I hope I'm wrong. I hope they change their minds. Anyone else interview on Friday and hear a similar story. I heard there were a number of Big Sky pilots in the interview. Anyone? Anyone?

In additional news there will be some upgrades soon. How many? I don't know. Apparently Lynx is short on the captain list.
Reply
Old 01-13-2008 | 01:57 PM
  #15  
ImEbee's Avatar
Portuguese Troubleshooter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Burrito Bomber
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
So whats this mean for their route structure and cities they serve? How many aircraft do they have flying now? They sure were quick to cancel the XJT flying. Gotta wonder what their plan is if they defer deliveries for over a year AND cancel the contractor that was flying the routes for them.
XJT was only there to cover the flying Lynx was going to miss due to certification delays. Once they had their certificate there was no need for XJT.
Reply
Old 01-13-2008 | 02:02 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
20 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Default

Originally Posted by ImEbee
XJT was only there to cover the flying Lynx was going to miss due to certification delays. Once they had their certificate there was no need for XJT.
Yes, I know. I misread the original post as Lynx was delaying aircraft deliveries not options.
Reply
Old 01-13-2008 | 05:40 PM
  #17  
paxhauler85's Avatar
*********
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TheGreatChecko
They have nine aircraft on the propery, number 10 is on its way. The current fleet more than covers the current flying and probably could absorb some more.

I'd expect to see the current destinations be adjusted and some shorter leg destinations added (COS, ASE, EGE???).

Checko
COS, maybe.

ASE and EGE, I don't think so.

Not saying the Q can't perform but I don't believe it can hack ASE.

That and those markets are already saturated.

UAL is running A-319's into EGE 4 times a day, supplemented by Dash-8-200's.

ASE is non stop CR7's. Literally. There is one every hour, both ways.
Reply
Old 01-13-2008 | 07:17 PM
  #18  
dolsanddays's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Keep on Truckin'
Default

Originally Posted by paxhauler85
COS, maybe.

ASE and EGE, I don't think so.

Not saying the Q can't perform but I don't believe it can hack ASE.

That and those markets are already saturated.

UAL is running A-319's into EGE 4 times a day, supplemented by Dash-8-200's.

ASE is non stop CR7's. Literally. There is one every hour, both ways.
Aspen has been begging for someone besides United to come in there. They are giving Lynx/Frontier subsidies for bringing in new service. United used to send the Dash-200 there and the 400 out performs that airplane by leaps and bounds.
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 07:48 AM
  #19  
CRJ1000's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: B-747-400/8
Cool Rockies

When is shasta going to fly to KASE, KEGE, KGUC, etc.? Seems like they could do well in those markets. Any word?
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 09:07 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 2
From: B757F CA
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
No one would be upset if:

Skybus was not growing
Virgin America was not growing
Mesa was not growing
Gojet was not growing

So why would you be upset when Lynx is not growing?

I would rather see a quality regional get their flying. That is definately not Lynx.
Gee, if you work at ASA or Eagle, then I'm pretty sure you'd think the same about RAH and TSA. Let's stop the "my regional is better than yours" bs. All regionals blow. I personally would rather see mainline get all the flying. More better jobs for everyone...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
snopilot
Regional
63
06-06-2008 06:02 PM
Wildlife L4
Regional
39
02-27-2008 08:51 AM
Wildlife L4
Regional
31
12-12-2007 07:01 AM
CRJ1000
Regional
4
07-14-2007 05:49 PM
ChrisH
Regional
70
01-01-2006 06:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices