![]() |
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 304317)
Ahhh yes, let the Mesaba guy throw the first stone. Nothing like a CRJ-900 CA making less than a 145 CA at CHQ, xjt, or CRJ200 at SKW(including their work rules and benefits). Smells like hypocrite!!!
|
Attack on Skywest.
Hey guys, checkout the thread titled: A sign of things to come. It’s a bunch of guys that want the regional airline service to end. What a bunch of selfish people.
|
Originally Posted by flycrj200
What a bunch of selfish people.
Do you really want to spend your career at a regional? Do you not realize the bigger the mainline is the more mainline jobs there will be and therefore the less regional lift and regional jobs required? I wanted regionals to go away when I was working at a regional...its not selfish, its looking at the long-term BIG PICTURE. |
Do you really consider CMH to DEN regional? How about ORD ot MIA?
Or ORD to AUS....... Yes some of the routes now flown by small jets use to be flown by REGIONALS but by and large regional meant.... RDU to ORF, JFK to BDL... Jetstreams, Shorts and Saabs......The lines have been blurred by the industry..... |
Originally Posted by flycrj200
(Post 304390)
Hey guys, checkout the thread titled: A sign of things to come. It’s a bunch of guys that want the regional airline service to end. What a bunch of selfish people.
Although not every line will be upgraded, mainline will cherry pick to improve their profitability and if it doesn’t work out then expect a return of larger regional jets. I for one am EXTREMELY HAPPY to see the industry turning back in house. I am very excited and I feel that our futures are looking brighter seeing that the overwhelming majority of us have dreams of one day making the move to mainline. |
ok so the bottom line out of all this is that skywest should vote in the new pay package. why?
1. theres no solidarity there and theyre going to do it anyway 2. they cant negotiate for anything better than that 3. many skw pilots apparently want to make that place a career good luck to you. as a former skw pilot i really care what happens to you guys i just hate to see you get shorted even if you are an industry leader. |
i think many at skw needed to see this proposed pay. They had believed their management would "do the right thing" and couldn't understand why so many other pilot groups were upset over the alpa vote. Management cool aid is meant to keep labor unions out and keep labor costs down. Management won. Many of their pilots believed they would have industry leading or matching pay and kept repeating "wait till the pay rates come out in January..." ... this should be all the reason more to get organized at skw. Those that had the red lips from the kool aid might take a more realistic look at their situation. the answer might not be alpa but something needs to happen.
|
Originally Posted by ghilis101
(Post 304464)
ok so the bottom line out of all this is that skywest should vote in the new pay package. why?
1. theres no solidarity there and theyre going to do it anyway 2. they cant negotiate for anything better than that 3. many skw pilots apparently want to make that place a career good luck to you. as a former skw pilot i really care what happens to you guys i just hate to see you get shorted even if you are an industry leader. |
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 304529)
I wouldn't go as far as saying that they are "an industry leader.";)
Yes because of having no representation, thus having no real bite, we don't lead the industry in negotiations but you could say that we lead in industry in Kool-Aid drinking. LOL! :D |
well this pay proposal is not going to infuriate the skw pilots and cause them to organize. that would just be way too ideal. instead theyll vote it in and continue to defend or justify the crap theyre being fed. and yes they are a leading regional airline, but i didnt say pay-wise.
even if you like where you work, you can still stand up every once in a while for yourselves. theres no shame in that. |
Originally Posted by JetJock16
(Post 304543)
I guess it's all in how you define "an industry leader." ;)
Yes because of having no representation, thus having no real bite, we don't lead the industry in negotiations but you could say that we lead in industry in Kool-Aid drinking. LOL! :D
Originally Posted by ghilis101
(Post 304559)
well this pay proposal is not going to infuriate the skw pilots and cause them to organize. that would just be way too ideal. instead theyll vote it in and continue to defend or justify the crap theyre being fed. and yes they are a leading regional airline, but i didnt say pay-wise.
even if you like where you work, you can still stand up every once in a while for yourselves. theres no shame in that. |
not saying its THE leader, its A leader. and not because of pay or QOL, but because they have a huge amount of flying
|
Originally Posted by ghilis101
(Post 304582)
not saying its THE leader, its A leader. and not because of pay or QOL, but because they have a huge amount of flying
|
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 304585)
...and quick upgrades!
|
.....and a large number of HOT FA's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Originally Posted by JetJock16
(Post 304599)
.....and a large number of HOT FA's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
And the best United rampers in the system!
|
Started a new thread with this, but since this seems to be the only thread being read on the subject:
------------------------------ I voted 'Decline' on the SKYW pay proposal this morning. First of all, it is a net pay decrease for me, a 2nd year FO. A 0.32% [11 cent] increase in my base rate coupled with a decrease of 1% in BHO (from 6% to 5%) I want first year FOs to get the 2.50/hr raise. I think it's a necessity to attract talent currently choosing other regional airlines with higher first year pay. I think the company will do this anyway. I don't want to pay for it, though. Management has negotiated a SAPA-certified way to pay for it -- via 2nd year FO pay. If they want this passed, porking the 2nd year FO is pretty stupid since 2006 hires comprise a rather large hunk of the CRJ pilot group. That's only my first reason. I love SkyWest and encourage anyone to get on board, but a 1% COLA????? That's just blatently retarded. That's retarded to me and I haven't been here through the 'DEAL-ME-AN-ACE' and other pay freezes. Why hasn't anyone considered doubling the OPS/PER awards percentage? That way if the company makes more money, we get more money. A fair way to get our share when times are good, and not screw ourselves when times are lean. |
Originally Posted by EngineOut
(Post 304686)
Started a new thread with this, but since this seems to be the only thread being read on the subject:
------------------------------ I voted 'Decline' on the SKYW pay proposal this morning. First of all, it is a net pay decrease for me, a 2nd year FO. A 0.32% [11 cent] increase in my base rate coupled with a decrease of 1% in BHO (from 6% to 5%) I want first year FOs to get the 2.50/hr raise. I think it's a necessity to attract talent currently choosing other regional airlines with higher first year pay. I think the company will do this anyway. I don't want to pay for it, though. Management has negotiated a SAPA-certified way to pay for it -- via 2nd year FO pay. If they want this passed, porking the 2nd year FO is pretty stupid since 2006 hires comprise a rather large hunk of the CRJ pilot group. That's only my first reason. I love SkyWest and encourage anyone to get on board, but a 1% COLA????? That's just blatently retarded. That's retarded to me and I haven't been here through the 'DEAL-ME-AN-ACE' and other pay freezes. Why hasn't anyone considered doubling the OPS/PER awards percentage? That way if the company makes more money, we get more money. A fair way to get our share when times are good, and not screw ourselves when times are lean. All I can say is Ha Ha Ha... rob Peter to pay Paul ..Screw the 2nd year FO to give a raise to the 1st year FO Classic balancing of the Books.. I just love it.... |
Originally Posted by JetJock16
(Post 304599)
.....and a large number of HOT FA's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Originally Posted by ANPBird
(Post 304881)
Yeaaaaaa.............! I commute through Den alot and man can I tell you....... Den and Cos has a ton of them!
|
Originally Posted by HercDriver130
(Post 304321)
RAH contract that was just amendable and was 4 years old had a 2% escalation to it each year. 3% should be the bare minimum as that is probably very close to historic averages for inflation.
Which is why a 1% COLA is rediculous. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:21 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands