Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Proposed SkyWest Pay released (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/21108-proposed-skywest-pay-released.html)

KingAirPIC 01-15-2008 04:57 PM

Proposed SkyWest Pay released
 
For those of you that have read the email and looked at the proposed pay increase... What do you think?

I think it's a little insulting, but that's just me.

copcar1988 01-15-2008 05:03 PM

I agree with you. I'm insulted too. My first thought is a no vote.

flyinghunter 01-15-2008 05:06 PM

Looks like the bro guys got screwed again, even the rj rates still don't set any standards, just bring us up to others, almost. Looks like a no vote.

ExperimentalAB 01-15-2008 05:18 PM

Why do I feel crapped on?? My knee-jerk reaction was HELL no. Now I'm just saying no way...'aint got my vote.

flybywire44 01-15-2008 05:21 PM

So you guys voted for or against ALPA?

BoilerUP 01-15-2008 05:23 PM

Anybody care to offer details?

ExperimentalAB 01-15-2008 05:29 PM


Originally Posted by flybywire44 (Post 300530)
So you guys voted for or against ALPA?

Yeah, so much for "I scratch yours, you scratch mine..."

I think I'm PO'd enough right now to vote in ALPA, if I had the chance, just out of spite. I'll get over it, but whiskey tango foxtrot.

SlingAir 01-15-2008 05:30 PM

Just remember last time we voted down a proposed pay package. It was 18% roughly. They came back with the Brad Holt Overide and ZERO for our Bro brothers.

We do not have a contract, we do not have legal representation. Therefore we have NO bargaining power. We get what they offer bottom line.

ExperimentalAB 01-15-2008 05:32 PM


Originally Posted by BoilerUP (Post 300531)
Anybody care to offer details?

Really the only increase in pay was for first-year, up to $22...but we lose the 700/900 override first year, as well as the increase every year thereafter. COLA of 1% starting next year. Captain's pay doesn't change until year three, and even then it looks like they get the shaft for a few years. 20 year CA rate is up $10. PLUS they included an EMB-170/175 rate???

BoilerUP 01-15-2008 05:35 PM

Yeah, I'd say that pretty much sucks.

I honestly thought they'd at least match or go ASA +1%...

ExperimentalAB 01-15-2008 05:35 PM


Originally Posted by SlingAir (Post 300543)
Just remember last time we voted down a proposed pay package. It was 18% roughly. They came back with the Brad Holt Overide and ZERO for our Bro brothers.

We do not have a contract, we do not have legal representation. Therefore we have NO bargaining power. We get what they offer bottom line.

It's the principle...this is a slap in the face. I'd rather have gotten no proposed pay rate. :mad:

SlingAir 01-15-2008 05:35 PM

Yeah what's up with the EMB 170/175 rates?

I agree a slap....

KingAirPIC 01-15-2008 05:54 PM

I'm hoping a no vote will send a message.
I'm hoping the EMB175, which is mentioned in the new pay, will be on property when the new pay rates go into effect. I hope the SAPA guys stand up for us. While I'm at it I'll hope that my new girlfriend is that hot one the Transformers movie. Oh, and I hope she brings that car with her too. I feel hopeful today.

JetJock16 01-15-2008 05:57 PM


Originally Posted by BoilerUP (Post 300549)
Yeah, I'd say that pretty much sucks.

I honestly thought they'd at least match or go ASA +1%...

Comparing them to ASA's hourly rates they're basically the same within + or - $.50. Bro pilots got 1.8% + 1% cola, per diem up to $1.65 and the average increase for RJ pilots is about 2.5%-3% with 1% cola and a loss in BHO cola.

I hate to say it but if we vote NO Mgmnt will just leave us with our current pay package and they'll increase first year to $22. That's what happens when you have no legal representation.

I'm voting NO on principle alone but I'm VERY VERY sure it will pass by about 65%+.

Airsupport 01-15-2008 05:59 PM

yeah just heard from a couple of my buddies.. needless to say they are not impressed.. well sapa once again has done exactly what it was supposed to do. blow a lot of smoke, get alpa voted down with promises of a big increase, and to once again crap on everyones good will. sorry koolaid man, i guess they lied to you..

what say ye tony?

JetJock16 01-15-2008 06:03 PM


Originally Posted by Airsupport (Post 300573)
yeah just heard from a couple of my buddies.. needless to say they are not impressed.. well sapa once again has done exactly what it was supposed to do. blow a lot of smoke, get alpa voted down with promises of a big increase, and to once again crap on everyones good will. sorry koolaid man, i guess they lied to you..

what say ye tony?

Ya, it's nice! Voted down ALPA and now we get basically the same pay as ASA who did all the leg work. Talk about riding coat tales.

rickair7777 01-15-2008 06:05 PM

It's about what I expected. At least they limited it to specified aircraft types.

Good news for SKW applicants, they will be able to afford REAL Ramen packs (as opposed to the generic ones).

Airsupport 01-15-2008 06:06 PM

my friends voted for alpa (and 2 of them were at alpa carriers before). now they are worried it might get voted down and then the company will just put into place what they want.

Airsupport 01-15-2008 06:08 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 300580)
It's about what I expected. At least they limited it to specified aircraft types.

Good news for SKW applicants, they will be able to afford REAL Ramen packs (as opposed to the generic ones).


it is really what you expected???

JetJock16 01-15-2008 06:08 PM


Originally Posted by Airsupport (Post 300581)
my friends voted for alpa (and 2 of them were at alpa carriers before). now they are worried it might get voted down and then the company will just put into place what they want.

Yes, I agree.

JetJock16 01-15-2008 06:09 PM


Originally Posted by Airsupport (Post 300583)
it is really what you expected???

Yes it is what I expected but I had hope for more. They are basically ASA rates.

iahflyr 01-15-2008 06:10 PM

Would any Skywest pilot mind taking a few minutes out of their life and please post the proposed pay scales?

Thank you.

JetJock16 01-15-2008 06:11 PM

SKW Pay Proposal Rates
 
1 Attachment(s)
I'll take flak but this is a discussion board. Here are the rates that were emailed to us.

ExperimentalAB 01-15-2008 06:17 PM

Even if we vote it down, Mgmt will still go ahead and raise first-year pay. They need the new-hires...

iahflyr 01-15-2008 06:23 PM

Thanks jetjock.

Take a look at the ASA rates
http://airlinepilotcentral.com/airli...l-lcc/asa.html

They are almost identical. The only exception is first year pay is $22 at Skywest and $23 at ASA. Pay on the 700/900 is $1 an hour less at Skywest for years 10-18. Also, 2nd year FO is $1 an hour less at Skywest on the CRJ-700/900. Also, the 1% COLA is VERY weak. What is ASA getting in 2009 and 2010?

I would sent it back. Ask for $23 (or more) first year pay, and higher than ASA rates of the CRJ-700 since Skywest also flies the 900. COLA of 3%. I would worry less about the max captain rates because only 20 year lifers get that rate, while almost everyone goes through years 1-5. Worry about those years.

When can Skywest vote in ALPA?
I still will not bash Skywest for voting against ALPA (since they are still a good operation), but it may come out being your best choice in the long run.

Airsupport 01-15-2008 06:24 PM

wow.... that is bad guys..

http://airlinepilotcentral.com/image...Y_PINNACLE.GIF


our contract will be 8 years old in 2 months. in 2010 your 50 seat rj captains will average only $4.00 more per a hour than our captains that are using a 8 year old contract... that is crazy! by then our contract would be 10 years old!!! 4 dollars for 10 years??? wow... and pinnacle is supposedly a bottom feeder..

and by looking at the payscales i would venture to guess that the guys in sapa that put this out have been there 20 years and decided to give themselves a nice little 7 percent rais while almost everyone else gets 2 percent.

JetJock16 01-15-2008 06:30 PM


Originally Posted by Airsupport (Post 300607)
and by looking at the payscales i would venture to guess that the guys in sapa that put this out have been there 20 years and decided to give themselves a nice little 7 percent rais while almost everyone else gets 2 percent.

Ding! Ding! Ding!

Lbell911 01-15-2008 06:34 PM

You get what your union dues pay for!

rickair7777 01-15-2008 06:38 PM


Originally Posted by Airsupport (Post 300583)
it is really what you expected???

Yes. What did you not understand about my statement? It was a very simple sentance.

JetJock16 01-15-2008 06:39 PM


Originally Posted by Lbell911 (Post 300619)
You get what your union dues pay for!

Really? :confused:

Ask MAG pilots about that one.

yellowfever 01-15-2008 06:40 PM


Originally Posted by iahflyr (Post 300606)
Thanks jetjock.

Take a look at the ASA rates
http://airlinepilotcentral.com/airli...l-lcc/asa.html

They are almost identical. The only exception is first year pay is $22 at Skywest and $23 at ASA. Pay on the 700/900 is $1 an hour less at Skywest for years 10-18. Also, 2nd year FO is $1 an hour less at Skywest on the CRJ-700/900. Also, the 1% COLA is VERY weak. What is ASA getting in 2009 and 2010?

I would sent it back. Ask for $23 (or more) first year pay, and higher than ASA rates of the CRJ-700 since Skywest also flies the 900. COLA of 3%. I would worry less about the max captain rates because only 20 year lifers get that rate, while almost everyone goes through years 1-5. Worry about those years.

When can Skywest vote in ALPA?
I still will not bash Skywest for voting against ALPA (since they are still a good operation), but it may come out being your best choice in the long run.

Keep in mind that Skywest has a BHO, so sim training, recurrent training, vacation accrual is all based on their 200 rates. Also, if they were to ever get a Embraer Jet, they will go to the sim and be paid crj 200 rates.

JetJock16 01-15-2008 06:42 PM


Originally Posted by yellowfever (Post 300627)
Keep in mind that Skywest has a BHO, so sim training, recurrent training, vacation accrual is all based on their 200 rates. Also, if they were to ever get a Embraer Jet, they will go to the sim and be paid crj 200 rates.

Somewhat correct but you forgot a few things; we also don't get paid the override for reserve, deadhead and cancellations. But it allows all pilots to fly the CR2/7 & 9 which greatly improves lines. Just ask those at ASA how crappy their CR7 lines can be.

rickair7777 01-15-2008 06:43 PM


Originally Posted by Airsupport (Post 300607)
wow.... that is bad guys..

http://airlinepilotcentral.com/image...Y_PINNACLE.GIF


our contract will be 8 years old in 2 months. in 2010 your 50 seat rj captains will average only $4.00 more per a hour than our captains that are using a 8 year old contract... that is crazy! by then our contract would be 10 years old!!! 4 dollars for 10 years??? wow... and pinnacle is supposedly a bottom feeder..

and by looking at the payscales i would venture to guess that the guys in sapa that put this out have been there 20 years and decided to give themselves a nice little 7 percent rais while almost everyone else gets 2 percent.

This is a bit misleading...

An 8 year old contract is a PRE 9/11 CONTRACT! You cannot realistically compare pre and post 9/11 contracts...the game is played on a different field now.

You are implying that your NEXT contract will be leaps and bounds better than your current one...

When do you expect to have a new contract? What numbers do you REALISTICALLY expect to get on the new one?

Airsupport 01-15-2008 06:47 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 300625)
Yes. What did you not understand about my statement? It was a very simple sentance.


*sarcasticly* well mister smarty pants (see how i had to spell that out because you cant tell how someone is saying something on the internet), when you said it i was trying to figure out if you said it like this

*agreeably* yeah thats about what i was expecting

*sarcasticly* yeah thats about what i was expecting

*depressed* yeah thats about what i was expecting

*angry* yeah thats about what i was expecting..

see where i am going with this.. of course you do your a smart guy.. :)

JetJock16 01-15-2008 06:51 PM

OK guys, back on topic.

I'm voting NO but I'm sad that the only unity we have here at SKW is to vote:

1. NO for representation
2. YES for any BS pay proposal Mgmnt dishes out

SAD, but it will pass by 65+%.

BoilerUP 01-15-2008 06:54 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777
An 8 year old contract is a PRE 9/11 CONTRACT! You cannot realistically compare pre and post 9/11 contracts...the game is played on a different field now.

Game might be played on a different field, but 8 years is 8 years and their company isn't shrinking, its growing. Like wildfire.


You are implying that your NEXT contract will be leaps and bounds better than your current one...
I hope and believe that if 9E management doesn't offer a TA that is "leaps and bounds" better than their current one the pilot group will strike to achieve that end.

For comparison's sake, the 50 seat rates in the ASA Contract 07 (which has rates higher than this Skywest proposal) are *lower* than the rates in AWAC's concessionary 2003 agreement.

Inflation was 6.3% in 2007...

Airsupport 01-15-2008 06:55 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 300631)
This is a bit misleading...

An 8 year old contract is a PRE 9/11 CONTRACT! You cannot realistically compare pre and post 9/11 contracts...the game is played on a different field now.

You are implying that your NEXT contract will be leaps and bounds better than your current one...

When do you expect to have a new contract? What numbers do you REALISTICALLY expect to get on the new one?

easy, we are going for expressjet rates plus 3%.. when will we get it?? probably when we have to strike. thats what our mec has told us and proposed to the company.. and are you really blaming your poor increase on 9/11 .. using 9/11 as a reason why your pay is just barely above ours is a terrible excuse,, especially 6 years later... you sound just like management telling us that times are tough and 9/11 and yadda yadda yadda... yet they post huge profits every quarter.. infact pinnacle is the most profitable company for investors amongst all the regionals.

SkyWestPilot1 01-15-2008 06:58 PM

I posted about a month ago that I was told all the company will give is 1% less than ASA. The reason I was given is that any new flying that SkyWest Inc. gets only SkyWest Airlines will fly, being that our costs are lower than ASA. I talked to a buddy of mine who was in SLC doing his PC today. The word he got was that the Southwest deal IS a done deal, Southwest is waiting to see exactly what our costs and oil prices are going to be before its signed.

HercDriver130 01-15-2008 07:00 PM

Giving Tony the benefit of the doubt.... he is awful quiet on this subject... as is Koolaide man......

JetJock16 01-15-2008 07:03 PM


Originally Posted by HercDriver130 (Post 300645)
Giving Tony the benefit of the doubt.... he is awful quiet on this subject... as is Koolaide man......

I'm sure their flying.

As for the Kool-Aid Mgmnt's trying to sale to us, taste a little like Lemon-Aid.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:55 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands