![]() |
Originally Posted by reelbigchair
(Post 316243)
You don't have to convince me, but you DO have to convince another 15% of our pilots. My opinion on anything is, if something hasn't worked a half dozen times, you should probably change the approach.
Again, my approach is to tell it like it is. ALPA is not omnipotent or perfect. But a union does mitigate a lot of things that would otherwise be worse. If the truth isn't good enough for people than nothing will.
Originally Posted by texaspilot76
(Post 316279)
I don't envy Skywest, but I do think they are a great company. Everyone wants to go there. Even my buddy, who could get on with most other regionals, is waiting until Skywest calls him. Why? From what I hear, it is because Skywest has good pay and work rules. And I firmly feel that is due to them being a non-union company. Companies reward their employees for hard work and loyalty, not ganging up to buck the system.
Anyways, I dont think their pilots were rewarded enough for their hard work and loyalty in defeating the ALPA vote.
Originally Posted by texaspilot76
(Post 316319)
I'm sorry. I shouldn't have stated my opinion to all you union guys. I will just state the facts:
1. Skywest is in the top 3 for pay among regionals. 2. Skywest has no shortage of qualified applicants, unlike other regionals. 3. Skywest has no union. There you go, just the facts.
Originally Posted by texaspilot76
(Post 316338)
50 seat RJ pay:
Year 1: XJT = $23 SKW = $22 OK, I'll give them a dollar Year 2: XJT = $34 SKW = $35 But take it right back Year 3: XJT = $37 SKW = $37 Sounds like the same to me. XJT: not hiring = no shortage of applicants.
Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
(Post 316340)
Okay, so the only difference between SkyWest and XJet now is ALPA...what's your point? Different strokes for different folks, er...companies, my friend.
Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
(Post 316365)
Absolutely - we at SkyWest know nothing of work-rules ...Why must all ya'll on APC be righteous in all things ALPA/SkyWest - telling us that what we have is not worthy of our talent etc...? I already have one set of parents - I don't need an extended-nuclear family on APC!
Originally Posted by Sniper
(Post 316390)
True, but the Republic rate is for E-175's, which are larger than anything Skywest flies.
The real judge of an airline, in my opinion, is the work rules and QOL. It's hard to gauge what 'the best' is in this area. If you live in Salt Lake, Skywest will likely be a better choice than any airline but Delta, and even that is debatable (if NWA and DL merge, what happens, plus SLC is not a junior base for DL, so you'd have to commute to the job for a bit - the lack of commute being the the whole reason you'd choose DL, likely) - in short, if you're living comfortably, then why leave? Considering what others are getting and the apparent shortage of pilots @ the regional new-hire level, I would think Skywest could have done better for their junior ranks, and the EMB guys. Would they have done better if they were ALPA or union at all? That is impossible to know, but we all can speculate.;)
Originally Posted by JetJock16
(Post 316438)
The E-jet has a longer range (200 nm) but was designed for 2 less seats and due to basic designs burns a bit more fuel. No JSJ, just basic facts. They both serve there purposes and both should be mainline.
|
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 316514)
Point is that without a union Skywest pilots will never get more than just at or around ASA rates when they should be the FDX/UPS of the regional industry.
|
Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
(Post 316536)
You just want to see us lose our Contracts...LoL - I'm on to you! There can be no such thing as a "regional UPS/FDX" as long as mainline uses each and every one of us to whipsaw against eachother. It 'aint gonna happen...
It 'aint gonna happen...overnight.;) |
Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
(Post 316536)
You just want to see us lose our Contracts...LoL - I'm on to you! There can be no such thing as a "regional UPS/FDX" as long as mainline uses each and every one of us to whipsaw against eachother. It 'aint gonna happen...
|
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 316514)
This is the mentality I'm talking about. Its not that something hasn't worked a half dozen times. Its that there is different amount of leverage from company to company. Mesa for example, they used up most of their leverage in their scope clause in order to reign in their alter ego airline. Like I said, things would have been MUCH MUCH worse without a union at places like Mesa, TSA, etc but people dont understand that and expect that everything should be as if their airline was successful and run by a competent management group. Its just unrealistic to think that ANY union can make things happen in an instant.
Again, my approach is to tell it like it is. ALPA is not omnipotent or perfect. But a union does mitigate a lot of things that would otherwise be worse. If the truth isn't good enough for people than nothing will. |
Originally Posted by reelbigchair
(Post 316742)
the half dozen times I'm referring to are the previous failed union drives at SkyWest.
Again, at this last drive (its the only one I was involved in), I only told people the truth. I was not going to make promises that were just not realistic even if it meant that it would persuade people. Many people wanted to know if there would be results the day after the vote (assuming it was successful, for the pilots that is). Things don't happen overnight and I wasn't going to say everything would happen overnight. Do you have any suggestions that doesn't involve not being truthful? |
Originally Posted by sonic
(Post 313605)
They took over Air Wisconsin flying at United for starters and they just put Skyway out of business.
How exactly did SkyWest put Skyway out of business in less than one year of flying for Midwest? Skyway was not making bundles of money flying 16 airplanes or they would have expanded. Ask yourself why Midwest/Skyway (same thing really) didn't buy CRJ's or ERJ's and fly them. The airplanes have been around for 15 years. How is a company with 11000 employees and significantly higher operating costs and pay that is higher in many other departments (such as mx) somehow cheaper than a company with fewer than 500 employees? Midwest/Skyway management put Skyway out of business with their inability/reluctance to expand them. Simple as that. Why were they never given more or larger airplanes? Midwest/Skyway management put Skyway out of business just as Kerry Skeen put ACA out of business and Geoff Crowley lost Air Wisconsin's United flying. |
Originally Posted by Go Ugly Early
(Post 316830)
Air Wisconsin flying? The flying was United's and Air Wisconsin lost the contract. Simple as that. No regional has their own flying. 90 percent of the regionals wouldn't even be in business if it weren't for the majors they get in bed with. Why is Air Wisconsin flying the same number of airplanes for USAir that they were flying for United?
How exactly did SkyWest put Skyway out of business in less than one year of flying for Midwest? Skyway was not making bundles of money flying 16 airplanes or they would have expanded. Ask yourself why Midwest/Skyway (same thing really) didn't buy CRJ's or ERJ's and fly them. The airplanes have been around for 15 years. How is a company with 11000 employees and significantly higher operating costs and pay that is higher in many other departments (such as mx) somehow cheaper than a company with fewer than 500 employees? Midwest/Skyway management put Skyway out of business with their inability/reluctance to expand them. Simple as that. Why were they never given more or larger airplanes? Midwest/Skyway management put Skyway out of business just as Kerry Skeen put ACA out of business and Geoff Crowley lost Air Wisconsin's United flying. Gotta agree with you though, SkyWest didn't put Skyway out of business, poor choice of aircraft, no plan for growth and a lack of economies of scale did. |
Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
(Post 316883)
ExpressJet does!:D
Gotta agree with you though, SkyWest didn't put Skyway out of business, poor choice of aircraft, no plan for growth and a lack of economies of scale did. |
Originally Posted by Go Ugly Early
(Post 316906)
ExpressJet does and I should have clarifed what I said. ExpressJet is already cutting branded flights because it just simply doesn't work for airlines to operate 50 seat airplanes with their own brand. It didn't work for Indy, it isn't working for GO! in Hawaii and it doesn't appear that ExpressJet's own brand is working. The gravy train the regionals enjoy is a result of the contracts they have with majors. Not criticism or flaming, just a fact.
You should also then be clarifying that while flying is getting cut in the east it is getting added in the west. Pretty much nothing in common with INDY. No Flaming, Just A FACT. The XJT brand is doing much better than INDY ever did. While some routes are being dropped they are tweaking the routes. Would you expect it to be an Instant success? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:38 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands