I know this is nit picking...
02-20-2008, 06:33 PM
#4
Am I Wrong??????????
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: ThE jEtTtTtTtT
Posts: 662
All Ops Specs should say CL-65 on it cuz thats what the FAA calls it. If your asking why its called that its because the original manufacturer "Canadair" designated "CL" for all of their products.
The "65" is the amount of souls that Canadair says it can legally hold. 50 passengers, 3 crew members and 12 lap children (12 cuz the right side of the A/C has the third o2 mask in every row...and their are only 12 rows on that side.)
The "65" is the amount of souls that Canadair says it can legally hold. 50 passengers, 3 crew members and 12 lap children (12 cuz the right side of the A/C has the third o2 mask in every row...and their are only 12 rows on that side.)
02-20-2008, 06:35 PM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 757 FO
Posts: 143
http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/ge...ers/ga0011.htm
Cuz the Canadians told you so!
Actually, I think CL65 is the ICAO designator for CRJ's in general, while CL67 and CL69 can be used for the 700 and 900 respectively.
Cuz the Canadians told you so!
Actually, I think CL65 is the ICAO designator for CRJ's in general, while CL67 and CL69 can be used for the 700 and 900 respectively.
02-20-2008, 06:39 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: retired
Posts: 645
Originally Posted by Flyboy8784
All Ops Specs should say CL-65 on it cuz thats what the FAA calls it. If your asking why its called that its because the original manufacturer "Canadair" designated "CL" for all of their products.
The "65" is the amount of souls that Canadair says it can legally hold. 50 passengers, 3 crew members and 12 lap children (12 cuz the right side of the A/C has the third o2 mask in every row...and their are only 12 rows on that side.)
The "65" is the amount of souls that Canadair says it can legally hold. 50 passengers, 3 crew members and 12 lap children (12 cuz the right side of the A/C has the third o2 mask in every row...and their are only 12 rows on that side.)
He said their OP specs have -2b19 and 2c10 or something like that, adding operators that have briefing cards cl-65 are old school.
Shouldn't some -2b19s be called a cl-67s because your math plus the flight deck and optional cabin jumpseat???
02-20-2008, 06:44 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: E170 FO
Posts: 686
I'd guess the type is CL-65 while the make and model may be more specific. I have an ERJ-170/190 SIC type(practically worthless, but serves the example). We fly the E170 and E175, but the op specs refere to the airplanes as E170-100SU and E170-200LR. When it a type covers multiple make and models, like the CRJ-200/700/900 and ERJ-170/190, they generalize the type name for your certifiates.
02-20-2008, 06:47 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: retired
Posts: 645
Originally Posted by ficone
http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/ge...ers/ga0011.htm
Cuz the Canadians told you so!
Actually, I think CL65 is the ICAO designator for CRJ's in general, while CL67 and CL69 can be used for the 700 and 900 respectively.
Cuz the Canadians told you so!
Actually, I think CL65 is the ICAO designator for CRJ's in general, while CL67 and CL69 can be used for the 700 and 900 respectively.
If I get hired by your airline, please don't volunteer that type of gouge for my training..
02-20-2008, 06:48 PM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: retired
Posts: 645
Originally Posted by cbire880
I'd guess the type is CL-65 while the make and model may be more specific. I have an ERJ-170/190 SIC type(practically worthless, but serves the example). We fly the E170 and E175, but the op specs refere to the airplanes as E170-100SU and E170-200LR. When it a type covers multiple make and models, like the CRJ-200/700/900 and ERJ-170/190, they generalize the type name for your certifiates.
02-20-2008, 06:55 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL
Posts: 413
The C is "Canadair" and the L is "Lear". The supercritical wing on the CRJ was designed by Lear, thus the L in the symbology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear
Not super official but the quickest reference I could find. Look under "innovations"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear
Not super official but the quickest reference I could find. Look under "innovations"
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
