I know this is nit picking...
02-20-2008 | 06:33 PM
#4
Am I Wrong??????????
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: ThE jEtTtTtTtT
All Ops Specs should say CL-65 on it cuz thats what the FAA calls it. If your asking why its called that its because the original manufacturer "Canadair" designated "CL" for all of their products.
The "65" is the amount of souls that Canadair says it can legally hold. 50 passengers, 3 crew members and 12 lap children (12 cuz the right side of the A/C has the third o2 mask in every row...and their are only 12 rows on that side.)
The "65" is the amount of souls that Canadair says it can legally hold. 50 passengers, 3 crew members and 12 lap children (12 cuz the right side of the A/C has the third o2 mask in every row...and their are only 12 rows on that side.)
02-20-2008 | 06:35 PM
#5
On Reserve
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 2
http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/ge...ers/ga0011.htm
Cuz the Canadians told you so!
Actually, I think CL65 is the ICAO designator for CRJ's in general, while CL67 and CL69 can be used for the 700 and 900 respectively.
Cuz the Canadians told you so!
Actually, I think CL65 is the ICAO designator for CRJ's in general, while CL67 and CL69 can be used for the 700 and 900 respectively.
02-20-2008 | 06:39 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: retired
All Ops Specs should say CL-65 on it cuz thats what the FAA calls it. If your asking why its called that its because the original manufacturer "Canadair" designated "CL" for all of their products.
The "65" is the amount of souls that Canadair says it can legally hold. 50 passengers, 3 crew members and 12 lap children (12 cuz the right side of the A/C has the third o2 mask in every row...and their are only 12 rows on that side.)
The "65" is the amount of souls that Canadair says it can legally hold. 50 passengers, 3 crew members and 12 lap children (12 cuz the right side of the A/C has the third o2 mask in every row...and their are only 12 rows on that side.)
He said their OP specs have -2b19 and 2c10 or something like that, adding operators that have briefing cards cl-65 are old school.
Shouldn't some -2b19s be called a cl-67s because your math plus the flight deck and optional cabin jumpseat???
02-20-2008 | 06:44 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: E170 FO
I'd guess the type is CL-65 while the make and model may be more specific. I have an ERJ-170/190 SIC type(practically worthless, but serves the example). We fly the E170 and E175, but the op specs refere to the airplanes as E170-100SU and E170-200LR. When it a type covers multiple make and models, like the CRJ-200/700/900 and ERJ-170/190, they generalize the type name for your certifiates.
02-20-2008 | 06:47 PM
#8
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: retired
http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/ge...ers/ga0011.htm
Cuz the Canadians told you so!
Actually, I think CL65 is the ICAO designator for CRJ's in general, while CL67 and CL69 can be used for the 700 and 900 respectively.
Cuz the Canadians told you so!
Actually, I think CL65 is the ICAO designator for CRJ's in general, while CL67 and CL69 can be used for the 700 and 900 respectively.
If I get hired by your airline, please don't volunteer that type of gouge for my training..
02-20-2008 | 06:48 PM
#9
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: retired
I'd guess the type is CL-65 while the make and model may be more specific. I have an ERJ-170/190 SIC type(practically worthless, but serves the example). We fly the E170 and E175, but the op specs refere to the airplanes as E170-100SU and E170-200LR. When it a type covers multiple make and models, like the CRJ-200/700/900 and ERJ-170/190, they generalize the type name for your certifiates.
02-20-2008 | 06:55 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: ATL
The C is "Canadair" and the L is "Lear". The supercritical wing on the CRJ was designed by Lear, thus the L in the symbology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear
Not super official but the quickest reference I could find. Look under "innovations"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear
Not super official but the quickest reference I could find. Look under "innovations"
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
