Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SkyWest looking to buy MAG, XJT, or both >

SkyWest looking to buy MAG, XJT, or both

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SkyWest looking to buy MAG, XJT, or both

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2008, 08:23 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Cool

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski View Post
We will vote to whatever suits us, sinking ship or not, if you think we will Vote in changes so YOUR management can take advantage of us, is about as silly as some of your posts

CAL has a history of pushing us into a corner, you will be able to read about it, in Larry Kellner's book, due out in 2010,

"FROM FIRST TO WORST

Silly posts ? Is this where we exchange insults ? You need to grow up.

It would be no surprise that many XJT guys and gals would be miffed at the provisions of SkyWest's offer ( I would be, too), but I would be honestly surprised that a majority would vote to (probably) put themselves on the street. Like there's lots of pilot jobs out there right now. But, stranger things have happened.

Listen, I really don't care whether our company buys XJT or not. I doubt seriously that there will be any short term benefit to the pilots at SKW or ASA, and only nebulous long term benefit. Obviously it's important to Jerry that he regain Continental business, and it's also important that we diversify to more carriers. Should United actually fail, for instance, we would be SCREWED (Delta, too, but I think they'll be ok).

Yes, our management will have their way with you
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 08:34 AM
  #42  
Furlough line holder
 
andy171773's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ2, ATR, CRJ7, E145, 737
Posts: 1,845
Default

I'm an outside perspective on the whole thing,...but does anyone else see SKW management as getting a bit greedy with maybe some $$ in their eyes.

Ya'll talk about XJET (or MAG) and ASA being whipsawed against each other....what do you think is stopping mgmt from whipsawing the SKW pilot group against these airlines?

I know i'll get messages saying "mgmt has always, and will always abide by our 'agreement'." but forgive me for being a tad pessimistic in saying this is a VERY different industry now..and in 6 months, it'll probably be an even more volatile landscape than it is now.

The bottom line is simple, with NO legally binding contract, mgmt can very easily do whatever they want, whenever they want..to whomever they want.

Don't forget, it's always..and i stress ALWAYS about the money.

Best of luck to every party involved.
andy171773 is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 08:45 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 951
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams View Post
Yes, our management will have their way with you
LOL!!!! Snap!
waflyboy is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 09:47 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 181
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams View Post
So, buying XJT will also have absolutely nothing to do with whether it is ALPA or not. Obviously, Chip and Jerry aren't going to play games with the ALPA provisions in the XJT contract that seriously limit the company. But they've never once stripped a purchased airline of its crews to then rehire them at first year pay and seniority.
The XJT pilots will do that to themselves, or not. They will have to vote to accept the changes to the contract, or go down with the ship trying to keep them.
We'll negotiate with Chip and Jerry - we aren't going to vote something out of our contract unless we can put "something else" in there.
ChinsFive is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 12:11 PM
  #45  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams View Post

Yes, our management will have their way with you
So proud to be part of SkyWest, ill be sure to thank you if/when we have 500 guys on the streets.................
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 12:24 PM
  #46  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams View Post
Granted, he did not involve himself in the contract negotiations until the end, nor does he have any experience in dealing with a labor union. But he wasn't impressed with the process.

So, buying XJT will also have absolutely nothing to do with whether it is ALPA or not. Obviously, Chip and Jerry aren't going to play games with the ALPA provisions in the XJT contract that seriously limit the company. But they've never once stripped a purchased airline of its crews to then rehire them at first year pay and seniority.

The XJT pilots will do that to themselves, or not. They will have to vote to accept the changes to the contract, or go down with the ship trying to keep them.

Long before ASA was bought, SkyWest bought Sun Aire. They were fully integrated into SkyWest on par. ASA would have been also, in my opinion, had it not been union, or if we had become union. The same would be true of XJT.
Trust me, the pilots aren't very impressed with the bargaining process either. The only reason why "involved himself" in the contract negotiations is because the NMB "involved" him when they required him to show up to the final day of negotiations with the threat that if they didn't come to an agreement the ASA pilots would be sent to a cooling off period.

As far as XJT contract provisions that "seriously limit the company," unless you think that having one seniority list seriously limits the company, there isn't anything in there that would. But if SKW got what they wanted they would be able to transfer aircraft without pilots and in essence would strip "its crews to then rehire them at first year pay and seniority." You are right though that the XJT pilots would do that to themselves if they let SKW get what they want without offering any protections and assurances. Remember, the CAL letter left the door open for XJT to come to terms with them if they provide the savings on the "magnitude" that SKW is offering.

It really does come down to SKW not wanting a certain labor group to organize. For all the talk that SKW treats their employees well but yet they are against wanting them to have a basic right to organize.

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams View Post
It would be no surprise that many XJT guys and gals would be miffed at the provisions of SkyWest's offer ( I would be, too), but I would be honestly surprised that a majority would vote to (probably) put themselves on the street. Like there's lots of pilot jobs out there right now. But, stranger things have happened.

Listen, I really don't care whether our company buys XJT or not. I doubt seriously that there will be any short term benefit to the pilots at SKW or ASA, and only nebulous long term benefit. Obviously it's important to Jerry that he regain Continental business, and it's also important that we diversify to more carriers. Should United actually fail, for instance, we would be SCREWED (Delta, too, but I think they'll be ok).

Yes, our management will have their way with you
The pilots are open to SKW buying XJT out. But the deal has to be right. If it is not, I think they will rather have XJT management make their own deal with CAL instead. Like I said, the letter left that door open. This is just CAL's way of using SKW to whipsaw XJT into coming to terms to the savings on the "magnitude" that SKW is offering. Its a negotiating tactic. CAL wins either way.

Your management cannot have its way like they legally can with its "at-will" employees. They are required to bargain with us, per the RLA, if they want certain things removed from our contract. If the XJT MEC comes to an agreement on those terms, the pilots would be required to ratify the agreement. There is no legal way for SKW management to "have their way with" us.
Nevets is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 01:27 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski View Post
So proud to be part of SkyWest, ill be sure to thank you if/when we have 500 guys on the streets.................

If SKW buys your company, and a SKW, Inc pilot hits the street (which hasn't happened yet ever), I think it will forces very far outside Jerry and Chip's control.

And, of course, I'll have absolutely nothing to do with it.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 01:28 PM
  #48  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,232
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets View Post
As far as XJT contract provisions that "seriously limit the company," unless you think that having one seniority list seriously limits the company, there isn't anything in there that would. But if SKW got what they wanted they would be able to transfer aircraft without pilots and in essence would strip "its crews to then rehire them at first year pay and seniority." You are right though that the XJT pilots would do that to themselves if they let SKW get what they want without offering any protections and assurances. Remember, the CAL letter left the door open for XJT to come to terms with them if they provide the savings on the "magnitude" that SKW is offering.

It really does come down to SKW not wanting a certain labor group to organize. For all the talk that SKW treats their employees well but yet they are against wanting them to have a basic right to organize.



The pilots are open to SKW buying XJT out. But the deal has to be right. If it is not, I think they will rather have XJT management make their own deal with CAL instead. Like I said, the letter left that door open. This is just CAL's way of using SKW to whipsaw XJT into coming to terms to the savings on the "magnitude" that SKW is offering. Its a negotiating tactic. CAL wins either way.

Your management cannot have its way like they legally can with its "at-will" employees. They are required to bargain with us, per the RLA, if they want certain things removed from our contract. If the XJT MEC comes to an agreement on those terms, the pilots would be required to ratify the agreement. There is no legal way for SKW management to "have their way with" us.

I think this whole thing is really more about CAL not wanting to pay XJET a relatively high guaranteed profit margin.

If SKW comes in with a new agreement, fine by CAL. If XJET stands alone, they will either need to negotiate a new contract with CAL, or lose flying (probably all of it eventually).

Labor is not the big issue in this deal, but there are a few concerns...

JA is not likely to agree to any deal which would force-integrate the SKW pilots into a union pilot group. It goes against the grain of the company, and it would be quite hypocritical after all the effort they put into squashing alpa last year.

But what Tony said is probably true. SKW will likely get the CAL flying...either by buying XJET under terms acceptable to both parties, or by picking up the pieces after CAL terminates the XJET contract.

The other possibility is that XJET management will voluntarily reduce their contract margins to keep the CAL flying. But will your management cheerfully eat that lost margin...or will they come looking to labor to make up the difference?

My suggestion to the XJET folks would be to make a deal with Jerry. You can probably keep your compensation package and your flying that way, which is not a bad deal in today's regional market. This is alltruistic advice, it will not benefit me to have XJET part of SKW. Actually I would likely benefit more if XJET were left alone to be disassembled by CAL since the SKW group would probably gain flying.

I don't think JA wants contractual freedom to remove your flying, I think he simply wants to avoid a pilot list integration.

I won't say that there was zero whipsaw with the ASA purchase, but in the grand scheme of things there wasn't much and both groups now have essentially equal compensation. Also it would be MUCH harder to whipsaw XJET because of the CAL scope...SKW would need a new certificate to whipsaw you guys because ASA and SKW both operate 70+ seaters.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 02:27 PM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I think this whole thing is really more about CAL not wanting to pay XJET a relatively high guaranteed profit margin.

If SKW comes in with a new agreement, fine by CAL. If XJET stands alone, they will either need to negotiate a new contract with CAL, or lose flying (probably all of it eventually).

Labor is not the big issue in this deal, but there are a few concerns...

JA is not likely to agree to any deal which would force-integrate the SKW pilots into a union pilot group. It goes against the grain of the company, and it would be quite hypocritical after all the effort they put into squashing alpa last year.

But what Tony said is probably true. SKW will likely get the CAL flying...either by buying XJET under terms acceptable to both parties, or by picking up the pieces after CAL terminates the XJET contract.

The other possibility is that XJET management will voluntarily reduce their contract margins to keep the CAL flying. But will your management cheerfully eat that lost margin...or will they come looking to labor to make up the difference?

My suggestion to the XJET folks would be to make a deal with Jerry. You can probably keep your compensation package and your flying that way, which is not a bad deal in today's regional market. This is alltruistic advice, it will not benefit me to have XJET part of SKW. Actually I would likely benefit more if XJET were left alone to be disassembled by CAL since the SKW group would probably gain flying.

I don't think JA wants contractual freedom to remove your flying, I think he simply wants to avoid a pilot list integration.

I won't say that there was zero whipsaw with the ASA purchase, but in the grand scheme of things there wasn't much and both groups now have essentially equal compensation. Also it would be MUCH harder to whipsaw XJET because of the CAL scope...SKW would need a new certificate to whipsaw you guys because ASA and SKW both operate 70+ seaters.
It is about CAL not wanting to pay what we want to charge them but they also want to keep ALL the prohibited provisions of the CPA as well, like the MFN clause. They want their cake and eat it too. And why not. They wrote the CPA and then sold XJT off for $16 a share. They hold most of the cards and left XJT management with very little leverage other than taking any aircraft released and putting them to work somewhere else. But even that is restricted by clauses in the CPA.

CAL has left the door open for negotiation for a CPA with XJT. They have used SKW as a negotiating tactic. Its a win win for CAL because either they get the savings of the magnitude SKW has offered through the buyout or from XJT as an independent.

If XJT signs a deal with the same "magnitude" in savings that SKW was offering there will not be a release of aircraft. And even if they decided to release aircraft anyways, XJT has first right of refusal on them. There is no guarantee that SKW will get any CAL flying.

Our management has had two great opportunities to come to any of our labor groups for concessions. Once with the original release of the aircraft and then again when the arbitrator ruled that XJT must lower their CPA rate. But neither time have they come to us asking. "It goes against the grain of the company." But you never know.

This is not to say that an the XJT pilots would not be open to an agreement with SKW to address their concerns. I think that if the deal is right, it could benefit everyone.
Nevets is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 02:35 PM
  #50  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams View Post
If SKW buys your company, and a SKW, Inc pilot hits the street (which hasn't happened yet ever), I think it will forces very far outside Jerry and Chip's control.

And, of course, I'll have absolutely nothing to do with it.
unfortunately, your wrong..................
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
meritflyer
Regional
36
01-14-2008 08:32 PM
Brown
Regional
20
11-21-2007 04:37 PM
Tech Maven
Money Talk
9
05-27-2006 06:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices