Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Bad Landing (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/23750-bad-landing.html)

Tinpusher007 03-20-2008 06:45 AM


Originally Posted by gbntpilot (Post 344524)
I'm right there with ya. I couldn't land smoothly (in the 900) to save my life on my last trip. Luckily, my ego became a little less bruised when the captain (who was a GHMC, if you know what that is) pounded one on in Harrisburg that made my carrier landings look beautiful by comparison.
It was at night, and he was blaming some reflection from the side windows that made him see two rows of edge lights. I've been looking for that anomaly ever since, and have yet to find it. :rolleyes:

One technique that seems to work well is to slowly start reducing power at the 50ft callout, but don't completely wipe it. Keep just a touch of power in until the 10ft call and then walk it all out and decrease pitch by 1 degree or so and it rolls on pretty nicely. One mistake a lot of people make is setting the pitch too high in the flare, especially when trying to slow a high descent rate, that just drives the mains into the ground. Oh well...good luck!

Killer51883 03-20-2008 06:47 AM


Originally Posted by Trip7 (Post 344148)
Thats so funny because my first smooth landing thats exactly what I did! I think Im going to start landing like that all the time since you mentioned it. How much time you have in the ATR?

i got just about 300 hours in it but most of it was on quick flights in between san juan and tortola (about 60 miles) so i got my fair share of landings in it. The one thing i can say about landing it is dont ever think you figured it out. once you think you have it will prove to you that you dont know how to land the thing.

Trip7 03-20-2008 10:19 AM


Originally Posted by Killer51883 (Post 344661)
i got just about 300 hours in it but most of it was on quick flights in between san juan and tortola (about 60 miles) so i got my fair share of landings in it. The one thing i can say about landing it is dont ever think you figured it out. once you think you have it will prove to you that you dont know how to land the thing.

True dat. When I was in St. Maarten I saw an Eagle ATR bounce it in there. I was glad to see Im not the only one that does that:D That Caribbean flying looks like a blast though!

sargeanb 03-20-2008 01:07 PM

Buffalopilot....we've all been there:) My worst was coming into RIC on my first flight after IOE...clear as a bell with minimal wind, just like everybody says....that's when it'll get you. Didn't transition my vision down the runway early enough...WHAAAAM. Other time I was nonrevving to MCO on a 757, biz traveller sitting next to me who said "Let's see how he does" when we were on final. It was a firm landing, but not bad in my opinion. Biz traveller chuckled and said "Ohhh nooope....you've gotta go talk to this guy." I just told him that wasn't bad...TRUST me.

WhizWheel 03-20-2008 04:57 PM

Man I pranged one on in the Dash in PWM so hard all the bins opened up. Of course it was clear and a million. It happens to all of us many more times than we care to admit.
A few of us finally had a competiton going. We called them dime landings. We'd place a US dime in between the ITT gauges and you had to make sure you kept it from popping out when you touched down. We finally got good enough with the US dime that we transitioned to the Canadian dime. Now that was hard!!

Swedish Blender 03-20-2008 08:33 PM


Originally Posted by Rocket Bob (Post 343559)
IOE on the 727, pulled the throttles to idle at 30 feet!! Heard the engineer audibly gasp, captain say "not yet!", then put a crater into the runway at DEN. I think the rollout was less than 500 feet. Never happened again, but in the 72 everything was a crapshoot... Passengers never said a word, at that place you got what you paid for I guess.

That's what you get for starting in the window seat!:p
I thought I'd try a VMC Cat IIIa from the right seat without the HGS by using the associated instruments. It never dawned on me that I wouldn't have the flare cue like in the HUD. You bounce pretty high hitting at 750 fpm.:D

jfrabell 03-26-2008 08:49 AM

I'm probably posting to keep my account active...but here goes.

I managed a landing in the 200 bad enough that the tower controller said, "Did that hurt?"

de727ups 03-26-2008 08:53 AM

"but in the 72 everything was a crapshoot... "

Ha....that was my experience as well.

NightIP 03-26-2008 11:01 AM


Originally Posted by freezingflyboy (Post 343020)
Landing in Lake Chuck, LA (5000' runway) during some rain in the E145 I put it down very firmly and got on it to get stopped. As we taxi to the gate the captain says "nice landing, I hate getting seat cushion up my butt watching you guys float trying to grease it onto a short runway". So I'm feeling pretty good about my "performance" landing. As the pax deplane, I'm turned around in my seat just in case anyone wants to look past the FA at the 2 goons who actually hurled them through the air at 450mph in a 50,000lb aluminum tube. As this one guy gets off he looks up into the front office and says "you boys practicing for those carrier landings?". Before I can say a word the FA says "well the option is an evacuation and a campfire in those trees over there...so I'd say it was a pretty decent landing". Guy just mumbled and walked off:D

I had something similar happen in JAN about a month back. It was a night visual to 16R with a bit of a right crosswind. When we got to about 50' I caught a pretty nice gust and had to really work to put the thing on centerline without a sideload. I went ahead and put it down somewhat firmly on the upwind wheel just so I didn't lose too much airspeed and control effectiveness with all the dramatics caused by the gust.

As we taxiied in, I actually felt really good about the approach and landing. Night visual, FD off, to a runway without an IAP and landed it safely with a gusty crosswind. But of course, once the door opened nobody seemed to care about any of that. One older man stopped by, looked at me, and said "must have been an FO landing!" I was a little annoyed by that, but what really made me angry was when an older lady stopped by the FA and told her "tell the pilot he gets an F!"

Yeah, I wasn't about to have that. I said "Ma'am, I landed the plane, why don't you tell that to me?" She kind of stammered for a minute (I don't think she thought I'd turn around), and then said "Well uhhh...the bags in the overhead weren't the only things that shifted during that landing!" :eek: The CA turned around at that point and told her that it was blustery outside and that the landing was fine.

I held my tongue, but I really wanted to ask her when the last time she landed a jet in a crosswind was...

Swass 03-26-2008 01:25 PM


Originally Posted by NightIP (Post 348897)
I had something similar happen in JAN about a month back. It was a night visual to 16R with a bit of a right crosswind. When we got to about 50' I caught a pretty nice gust and had to really work to put the thing on centerline without a sideload. I went ahead and put it down somewhat firmly on the upwind wheel just so I didn't lose too much airspeed and control effectiveness with all the dramatics caused by the gust.

As we taxiied in, I actually felt really good about the approach and landing. Night visual, FD off, to a runway without an IAP and landed it safely with a gusty crosswind. But of course, once the door opened nobody seemed to care about any of that. One older man stopped by, looked at me, and said "must have been an FO landing!" I was a little annoyed by that, but what really made me angry was when an older lady stopped by the FA and told her "tell the pilot he gets an F!"

Yeah, I wasn't about to have that. I said "Ma'am, I landed the plane, why don't you tell that to me?" She kind of stammered for a minute (I don't think she thought I'd turn around), and then said "Well uhhh...the bags in the overhead weren't the only things that shifted during that landing!" :eek: The CA turned around at that point and told her that it was blustery outside and that the landing was fine.

I held my tongue, but I really wanted to ask her when the last time she landed a jet in a crosswind was...


I would hope you would hold your tongue. Those pax happen to pay your salary, and I would think you would be a professional whilst in uniform. What happened to the old saying "The customer is always right"? I know it sounds nitpicky but you should grow some thicker skin, have fun with it instead of it making you all upset. Your paid to land in a crosswind, hence the good view you have up front.

NightIP 03-26-2008 01:28 PM


Originally Posted by Swass (Post 349023)
I would hope you would hold your tongue. Those pax happen to pay your salary, and I would think you would be a professional whilst in uniform. What happened to the old saying "The customer is always right"? I know it sounds nitpicky but you should grow some thicker skin, have fun with it instead of it making you all upset. Your paid to land in a crosswind, hence the good view you have up front.

You can save the lecture. I did hold my tongue.

NightIP 03-26-2008 01:34 PM

By the way, after enough waiting tables in my lifetime I hate it when people try to tell me "the customer is always right." In fact, many customers are rude, ignorant, or downright hostile towards employees. I do my best always to treat my customers well (and yes, being an airline pilot is a customer service oriented job), but sometimes the things they do can't just be allowed to happen.

Here's a good read: http://positivesharing.com/2006/07/w...tomer-service/

Red Forman 03-26-2008 01:39 PM

The customer is not always right, and that is one of the most stupid sayings around. Just because you pay money for something does not give you a right to be rude and say whatever you want, and people that think they can should be put in their place.

coyote 03-26-2008 02:50 PM

Worst landing I ever made got me praised by 3 or 4 pax and the Senior. Little did they know.

rorwizard 03-26-2008 07:27 PM


Originally Posted by NightIP (Post 349030)
By the way, after enough waiting tables in my lifetime I hate it when people try to tell me "the customer is always right." In fact, many customers are rude, ignorant, or downright hostile towards employees. I do my best always to treat my customers well (and yes, being an airline pilot is a customer service oriented job), but sometimes the things they do can't just be allowed to happen.

Here's a good read: http://positivesharing.com/2006/07/w...tomer-service/


Welcome to SWA's philosophy

GravellyPointer 03-26-2008 09:19 PM


Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB (Post 344276)
Just because the Duchess and CRJ-200 are easy to land doesn't make them nice to land...they roll down the runway like loose goose's and hit the runway like a rolling pig - not exactly pleasant.

Give me stiff gear, where I can occasionally really grease the bird on and I'm happy!

Remember kids - the -200 makes most landings good, but a great landing impossible. Rise to the challenge that a stiff gear gives you!

I submit that you have room to improve your CRJ200 landings (and takeoffs). You CAN make a great landing in a CRJ, it's just not guaranteed every time. Don't give up on the A/C, but don't overcontrol and float too much either. Many pilots carry thrust until too low and/or flare too late, float and then drop it in. It's about maintaining a low sink rate that last 5 ft. With the right pitch and roll on the yoke, the CRJ will roll down the runway pretty nicely.

The mystery I've yet to solve with the CRJ200 is why do some pretty soft touchdowns have no GLD induced squatting, while during other soft touchdowns the GLD spoils it for you. It seems to me that the squatting occurs when you touchdown at a higher than normal speed.

Watch an Airbii 3xx series, the GLD deploy slowly, while the 737 pop up instantly, it makes a difference.

xjcaptain 03-26-2008 09:29 PM


Originally Posted by Yzerman (Post 343638)
Yeah I've had a handful of crap landings in the -200. But the best one was going into PLN...

The FA kept telling us how rude and snobby the pax were being to her, and it was my leg, so I decided to just not give a F about the quality of the landing. I'm not saying I tried to crash, but I just didn't care about (and kinda enjoyed) firmly planting it on the ground and testing the anti-skid.

And the captain got to do his part by riding the brakes all the way to the gate. On that particular plane that day, if you did it just right the brakes would scream like an approaching train and the whole airplane would vibrate. It was great.

I usually don't care about the landing quality in HPN either, just in case the infamous passenger who "doesn't talk to the help" is on board.


Spoken like a true professional...........Wonder why 9E gets the reputation that is has.

Swass 03-27-2008 06:04 AM

Night and Red -

Keep on plugging away at what ever Regional you work at, it fits your attitude. Corporate or Fractional is not in your future unless you change your outlook on little things like this.


You wouldn't see anyone at NJ or the like treat their pax that way. Sack up or let someone else deal with them. In the end, it was your touchdown that garnered the negative attention from the passenger in the first place. Nobody's perfect, especially me, but I would never get smart with a paying passenger. Just let someone else deal with them, they are probably scared to fly, self absorbed chumps who think that the plane is so automated it could land itself so why even bother with them. Give them a smile, it actually tees them off more to not get a reaction from you.

Peace Brothers. :)

tpaRob 03-27-2008 07:12 AM

"What is it about hard landing that makes me have to xxxx? You really jarred something loose tiger." - Landlady in Kingpin

NightIP 03-27-2008 09:22 AM


Originally Posted by Swass (Post 349471)
Night and Red -

Keep on plugging away at what ever Regional you work at, it fits your attitude. Corporate or Fractional is not in your future unless you change your outlook on little things like this.


You wouldn't see anyone at NJ or the like treat their pax that way. Sack up or let someone else deal with them. In the end, it was your touchdown that garnered the negative attention from the passenger in the first place. Nobody's perfect, especially me, but I would never get smart with a paying passenger. Just let someone else deal with them, they are probably scared to fly, self absorbed chumps who think that the plane is so automated it could land itself so why even bother with them. Give them a smile, it actually tees them off more to not get a reaction from you.

Peace Brothers. :)

Fair enough, but I won't tolerate customers being rude or condescending to me simply because they paid some money to fly on my aircraft. I've been in that position before and now refuse to become a doormat.

As I said, I treat my customers very well, and it drives me up the wall when I fly with CAs who don't make PAs the entire flight or update the people in the back on delays or other critical information. However, my dignity is worth more than the money they paid to fly on the plane. I believe that there are certain things that customers can get away with before being called out on it, and treating employees like dirt isn't one of them.

Red Forman 03-27-2008 10:38 AM


Originally Posted by Swass (Post 349471)
Night and Red -

Keep on plugging away at what ever Regional you work at, it fits your attitude. Corporate or Fractional is not in your future unless you change your outlook on little things like this.


You wouldn't see anyone at NJ or the like treat their pax that way. Sack up or let someone else deal with them. In the end, it was your touchdown that garnered the negative attention from the passenger in the first place. Nobody's perfect, especially me, but I would never get smart with a paying passenger. Just let someone else deal with them, they are probably scared to fly, self absorbed chumps who think that the plane is so automated it could land itself so why even bother with them. Give them a smile, it actually tees them off more to not get a reaction from you.

Peace Brothers. :)

The businesses that do the best put their employees first and their customers second or third. Trust me, there is a good reason why companies like this do so well, maybe you did not read the article that night put up.

Fokker28 03-27-2008 05:51 PM

My stock response is, "That'll teach 'em!"

USMCFLYR 03-27-2008 08:46 PM

"firmly planting it on the ground and testing the anti-skid."

Sounds like the landing I had the other day in ONT. Great flight and good landing, but at the very end you felt that ATC asked the guy if he could make the next taxiway and he STOOD on the brakes and we all tested the seat belts. Got a few murmurs out of the pax, but all these airline landings are much better than what I normally endure so I'm not one to complain!

USMCFLYR

SOFA 03-27-2008 08:57 PM

My first few landings during IOE were transparent to me until my LCP got on the PA and welcomed everyone aboard the USS LaGuardia. Things got randomly better, but here's my thought: a good hard landing makes the folks appreciate the fact that they got their money's worth by arriving safely. For those of you that grease them on every time, thanks alot...people think that it is easy and safe enough to pay less money for the ticket. Make them appreciate the fact that they only paid for one of the two landings that we made!

ExperimentalAB 03-27-2008 09:08 PM


Originally Posted by SOFA (Post 350005)
My first few landings during IOE were transparent to me until my LCP got on the PA and welcomed everyone aboard the USS LaGuardia. Things got randomly better, but here's my thought: a good hard landing makes the folks appreciate the fact that they got their money's worth by arriving safely. For those of you that grease them on every time, thanks alot...people think that it is easy and safe enough to pay less money for the ticket. Make them appreciate the fact that they only paid for one of the two landings that we made!

I like the way you think LoL :D

Yzerman 03-28-2008 10:58 AM


Originally Posted by xjcaptain (Post 349367)
Spoken like a true professional...........Wonder why 9E gets the reputation that is has.

I'm sure it's all because of things like exaggerated stories about crappy landings, written on an internet message board. :rolleyes:

BURflyer 05-11-2008 07:08 PM

The worst ones are the ones that are firm but don't seem that bad only to have comments from pax as the exit out about how the airplane needs better shock absorbers.

steveo1kinevo 05-11-2008 07:40 PM

My landings are always smooooth....Yeah Right! Haha

flynavyj 05-11-2008 07:43 PM

was in an attempt to make taxiway charlie landing on 20 in RIC a few weeks back...made the taxiway without incident, but the landing most likely dented the pavement....no matter, i showed richmond.

takpilot 05-18-2008 09:49 AM

Still on IOE for the A320...and my landings are like the military beacons....1 good 2 to forget.... still trying to flare at 50 and keep the centerline..:D

cessna157 05-18-2008 11:21 AM


Originally Posted by takpilot (Post 385674)
Still on IOE for the A320...and my landings are like the military beacons....1 good 2 to forget.... still trying to flare at 50 and keep the centerline..:D

I would be personally offended if everytime I came in for landing I got called a "retard" :mad:

SmoothLanderJ 05-18-2008 01:44 PM


Originally Posted by cessna157 (Post 385724)
I would be personally offended if everytime I came in for landing I got called a "retard" :mad:

LOL!.......Good one!

SmoothLanderJ 05-18-2008 01:50 PM


Originally Posted by Tinpusher007 (Post 344658)
One technique that seems to work well is to slowly start reducing power at the 50ft callout, but don't completely wipe it. Keep just a touch of power in until the 10ft call and then walk it all out and decrease pitch by 1 degree or so and it rolls on pretty nicely. One mistake a lot of people make is setting the pitch too high in the flare, especially when trying to slow a high descent rate, that just drives the mains into the ground. Oh well...good luck!

Man, that couldnt be more true, the 900 can be tricky from what I've seen. I just finished SIMs last weeks and for the most part my landings were good. But, on my LOFT flight for some unknown reason, at the 50ft callout I instantly went to idle thrust.........SLAM! I think I was a little soar after that one. O, and I have IOE starting this Tuesday, I certainly will bring the power out much slower at that 50ft call........

withthatsaid182 08-21-2008 07:42 AM

I just keep resurectting all the old post about first flights and bad landings today! But hey it's my day off, the lady is at work actually making money and I have to catch up on my rumors.

I can't tell if my landings suck or not. It sounds dumb but I think it really depends on where you are sitting. I think when you're sitting in the back any seat on or behind the wing makes for a hard landing. In the cockpit its hard to judge those that are on the fence. (but if you're on the fence than in probably sucked).

I was going into Boston on a nice morning and flew this really smooth visual and was on speed, on glideslope, gettin' in early and makin' my flight home...when I then proceeded to push 22L furthur into the ocean. Landing a fully loaded jungle jet on all three at once makes a weird noise. The captain was a nice guy and kinda just laughed, while the jumpseating captain gave me one of those "you're an idiot" head shakes.

Everyone I've talked to/flown with has a different method/technique/opinion on how to land a jet. I just hope when the nose comes down that theres pavement in front of me.

JetAV8er 08-21-2008 09:21 AM

A grease-job landing is 50 percent luck; two in a row are entirely luck; three in a row and someone's lying!

rogerwilcoout 08-22-2008 01:58 AM


Originally Posted by JetAV8er (Post 447666)
A grease-job landing is 50 percent luck; two in a row are entirely luck; three in a row and someone's lying!

You can say that again. Sometimes I go the whole trip without making a "good" landing. Hey, at least they are in the touchdown zone, huh?

HercDriver130 08-22-2008 02:22 AM

REAL greasers are luck.... the guy who is trying like crazy to grease it on is the guy who will burn up 4000 feet of runway... then slam on the brakes and dump the reversers .......who gives a crap if you grease it on only to have to get on the brakes so hard that everyone is uncomfortable.... IDIOTS!!!

seanthornton 08-22-2008 05:23 AM

One of my favorites was when I pounded it onto 34 at HPN during a blustery evening in a crj 700. Saying goodbye to the pax at the door as they deplaned, a really fat guy in a huge track suit warm up thing said "that landing hurt" real cocky like. As I smiled and was biting my tongue FA says "we were a little heavy today". Bought her a drink that night!

rogerwilcoout 08-22-2008 06:53 AM


Originally Posted by HercDriver130 (Post 447994)
REAL greasers are luck.... the guy who is trying like crazy to grease it on is the guy who will burn up 4000 feet of runway... then slam on the brakes and dump the reversers .......who gives a crap if you grease it on only to have to get on the brakes so hard that everyone is uncomfortable.... IDIOTS!!!

Werent you the pilot that did that to me in the Herc when I was a paratrooper at Bragg? Lol Yeah, u r right. Don't burn up the rw for the perfect landing. Bad technique.

rogerwilcoout 08-22-2008 06:54 AM


Originally Posted by cessna157 (Post 385724)
I would be personally offended if everytime I came in for landing I got called a "retard" :mad:

It used to be when I got home that I was called that, but I divorced her.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:45 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands