Heres the Letter from Misner to XJT Regarding SKW
#121
Banned
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Slaphappy, I've read all your posts, and you come off only as a flamebait. How would you take it if we turn the table and say XJT is going to buy SKW and take your flying. Be careful, I'm expecting a certain response from you.
#122
i can read, thanks. that's not what i asked. your other post insinuated that your pilot group would get a vote on whether or not the sale to skywest inc. could or would happen, separate from any vote done by the shareholders. remember, the board of directors cannot by themselves approve this sale, either. only the shareholders can. skywest inc. is offering to buy all outstanding shares of stock.
#123
this doesn't make any sense either. "master" list comprised of whom exactly? expressjet pilots? don't you already have a list based on DOH? who else would you like to add to that list?
#124
Banned
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
You can't tell me the SKW guys wouldn't want XJT kept separate for this reason, so they can get most of the new flying with fewer companies to compete for it. Do you really think the XJT pilots would fall for that?
I know there are plenty of SKW guys that want our DAL LAX base, but don't want senior guys than them at XJT to be above them. If you want to merge our seniority lists, I'm down to consider that, otherwise if we would be kept separate, I would rather stay an independently owned and separate and compete fairly for new flying.
#125
you obviously have no idea what my dreams are like. i can tell you for sure that they do not include what the XJT guys do or don't want. also, even besides my dreams, i would never claim to know what XJT "guys" want or don't want, nor would i assume that all 2900 of them want or don't want the exact same thing. skywest inc. buying expressjet does not mean the lists would have to merge. there's no precedent for that at all, and i'm not sure to whose benefit that would be. oh...maybe alpa's coffers.
#126
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
i can read, thanks. that's not what i asked. your other post insinuated that your pilot group would get a vote on whether or not the sale to skywest inc. could or would happen, separate from any vote done by the shareholders. remember, the board of directors cannot by themselves approve this sale, either. only the shareholders can. skywest inc. is offering to buy all outstanding shares of stock.
Comprised of all the pilot groups under the SKYW umbrella. So that when a furlough happens, or SKYW loses all the CAL flying our 20 year guys don't get sent to the street while SkyWest newhires stay put.
Last edited by ChinsFive; 04-27-2008 at 11:38 PM.
#127
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
CAL wants a new, lower rate from XJT for all 205 aircraft. A couple percent difference in the profit margin would be around $25 million dollars annually, which I'd consider to be a large magnitude. SKYW makes money, just less than XJT would under the current CPA. Further, elimination of duplication in the offices and combining ground handling at airports where both XJT and SKYW have operations would certainly offer some cost savings as well.
Yep, that's what SKW did with/to ASA.
As for the Magnitude of savings, I not a SKW or CAL bean counter but if XJT is operating at a 10% margin and SKW can offer a new CPA to CAL for XJT to do the flying at 8% then that will save CAL tens of millions of dollars. Then I'm sure that with all three (SKW, ASA and XJT) combining and reducing overhead with buying power as well as several other combined operations, they will easily be able to cover the 2+% and therefore end up with a cost neutral contract all while never putting a single employee on the street.
As for the Magnitude of savings, I not a SKW or CAL bean counter but if XJT is operating at a 10% margin and SKW can offer a new CPA to CAL for XJT to do the flying at 8% then that will save CAL tens of millions of dollars. Then I'm sure that with all three (SKW, ASA and XJT) combining and reducing overhead with buying power as well as several other combined operations, they will easily be able to cover the 2+% and therefore end up with a cost neutral contract all while never putting a single employee on the street.
I believe you are wrong about this.
The way I read that, it says that if Skywest aquires Expressjet then the new CPA with Skywest will go into effect. It then says if Expressjet does not accept Skywest's buyout, then they take 51 airplanes out of service in December 2009 and let the company die by 2012. I don't see anything about CAL taking those 51 planes of Expressjet is bought by Skywest.
The way I read that, it says that if Skywest aquires Expressjet then the new CPA with Skywest will go into effect. It then says if Expressjet does not accept Skywest's buyout, then they take 51 airplanes out of service in December 2009 and let the company die by 2012. I don't see anything about CAL taking those 51 planes of Expressjet is bought by Skywest.
Skywest knows very well what the expressjet contract says. Looks like Xjt has 2 choices sell and delete the 5 pages in the contract or stay on their own and lose all their cal flying in the next 3 years not to mention the loss of money on the branded. Seems like the MEC needs to step up to the plate and figure out whats best for the future not try and act macho.
But none of this really matters since expressjet has already said No to the buyout and I don't think JA will want to spend much more the 188 mil for an airline who doesn't own much or own any of their a/c. I think skywest will get the cal flying either with xjt or without.
Don't underestimate JA he is probably one of the smartest people in the biz, and knows all the outcomes, he isn't some pushover just ask the ASA pilots about it.
But none of this really matters since expressjet has already said No to the buyout and I don't think JA will want to spend much more the 188 mil for an airline who doesn't own much or own any of their a/c. I think skywest will get the cal flying either with xjt or without.
Don't underestimate JA he is probably one of the smartest people in the biz, and knows all the outcomes, he isn't some pushover just ask the ASA pilots about it.
Like you said, the XJT BOD rejected the offer so right now there is no reason to even get the XJT MEC involved yet.
By the way, XJT has $214 million in cash an cash equivalents, and $597 million in total assets as of Dec 31, 2007. My guess is that the $188 million bid grossly undervalues XJT.
I don't know what you mean about ASA and JA not being a pushover.
Your MEC is not looking out for your jobs, they are looking to make a political point the same way the ASA pilots tried to make a point and failed and the same way the current USair east pilots are making a point. Sorry but your MEC doesn't have any leverage right now, you may feel differently but the reality is the best way to protect jobs is to work with JA and accept what he is offering. There are so many ways this deal could get even worse that it currently is. For example there is nothing stopping Ream from entering Chpt 11 ala Mesaba style, getting nice cash bonus from whomever and just having your entire contract thrown.
An airline with 280 50 seaters and a branded operation that is losing money and 205 airplanes that will 100% be out of work in 2 years is not one that should strutting around like a male peacock.
An airline with 280 50 seaters and a branded operation that is losing money and 205 airplanes that will 100% be out of work in 2 years is not one that should strutting around like a male peacock.
Don't confuse the XJT pilots with the XJT BOD. Two different entities. The XJT BOD feels like the offer grossly undervalues XJT. I'm sure they would take the right deal if it is offered. Its not about peacocks. They are looking out for the best interest of the shareholders. The XJT MEC will also listen to any offers made by SKW in return for scope relief. And they will do what is in the best interest of the XJT pilots.
no offense, but are you actually trying to say that your pilots will get a make or break vote on whether or not skywest inc. buys expressjet? that doesn't even make any sense. any negotiating you/your mec would do would happen AFTER such a buyout occurs. unless you have some supersecret clause in the contract that the shareholders don't know about or something?
i can read, thanks. that's not what i asked. your other post insinuated that your pilot group would get a vote on whether or not the sale to skywest inc. could or would happen, separate from any vote done by the shareholders. remember, the board of directors cannot by themselves approve this sale, either. only the shareholders can. skywest inc. is offering to buy all outstanding shares of stock.
There doesn't need to be any precedent. Its in our contract and precisely why JA wants that part null and void.
Last edited by Nevets; 04-28-2008 at 12:09 AM.
#128
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
I don't think SlapHappy has any idea what goes on in a UNION, becuase he is not part of one. One thing is for sure, our pilot group, will not settle for less, like some we know......................CRJ-900 payrates??????????
And to his ridiculous comment about Expressjets MEC not looking out for the pilot group, thats just ignorance, our Chairmen had the opportunity to flow through to CAL, he could of probably been holding close to 75 CA, so he has a lot vested in this, hes a very very bright guy.
And to his ridiculous comment about Expressjets MEC not looking out for the pilot group, thats just ignorance, our Chairmen had the opportunity to flow through to CAL, he could of probably been holding close to 75 CA, so he has a lot vested in this, hes a very very bright guy.
Last edited by JoeyMeatballs; 04-28-2008 at 05:10 AM.
#129
just so i understand this correctly: you're saying it's specifically in the expressjet pilot contract that if expressjet gets bought by some other company, the expressjet pilot seniority list must merge with all the other seniority lists of all other companies owned by the company that buys expressjet? if that's the case, then i see what you mean about a "make or break" vote by expressjet pilots.
#130
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
just so i understand this correctly: you're saying it's specifically in the expressjet pilot contract that if expressjet gets bought by some other company, the expressjet pilot seniority list must merge with all the other seniority lists of all other companies owned by the company that buys expressjet? if that's the case, then i see what you mean about a "make or break" vote by expressjet pilots.
Yes, that's correct. That's why J.A. wants it out, it's a deal breaker.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



