Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
When is RAH's contract up with CAL? >

When is RAH's contract up with CAL?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

When is RAH's contract up with CAL?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2008 | 01:16 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
Default

Originally Posted by labbats
What does that have to do with bleeding money on a 2 year stint with CRJs and a provider that had to start from scratch using them?

Either way, Chautublic and/or Continental lost their ASS.
CHQ's management took a gamble and there is no guarantee they lost money on the deal. If the gamble pays off and they eventually do fly a 170 for cal it would have been worth the headache of setting up a new operation. Its too soon to tell if its ever going to pay off. If i was republic and i heard skywest was about to buy xjt i would have some serious issues to work out. Skywest was the first pick to do the 69 aircraft flying for CAL. They refused due to the terms and CHQ picked it up.
Reply
Old 04-26-2008 | 01:18 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
20 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Default

Originally Posted by mking84
Because both thought they could get CAL pilots to give up on scope and fly the mighty E170 for them......that didnt happen. Im pretty sure there are public statements by the RAH CEO stating that.
That was my gut feeling as well when this whole CHQ business played out. Ask Toilet Duck (when hes done being banned AGAIN), he says he saw models of E170s in COEX colors in the uniform office at RAH Lets not forget, CAL is still in contract negotiations with ALPA. Just because they haven't caved on scope YET, doesn't mean it won't happen. Theres nothing stopping CAL from pointing at a loss and saying "we can't raise pay or improve workrules unless you give up scope". I hope theres enough guys at CAL who aren't willing to give up scope for larger jets but you just never know. I hate to dig up the ancient past, but CAL is known for having a lot of very short sighted, selfish individuals on property.

In reality, this whole mess is just aggravated by the clash of egos. Larry Kellner is unhappy because he can't push us around and Jim Ream is annoyed that Kellner (and others) don't see the value that our product has. Its no secret, Kellner doesn't give a rip about quality. In fact, since taking over Larry has done very little to improve the quality of the Continental product and has taken great strides to erode that quality such as the whole CHQ debacle, removing meals from a lot of flights (what happened to "meals at meal time"? When does Larry Kellner ever eat!?) and anybody else hear the rumor that they are removing the video screens from the the 737s? When you see it from the perspective of a group who has done nothing but their very best to provide the utmost level of quality and service FOR CAL'S CUSTOMERS just to be kicked to the curb, it can be very frustrating and disheartening.

Last edited by freezingflyboy; 04-26-2008 at 01:27 PM.
Reply
Old 04-26-2008 | 01:23 PM
  #23  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
That was my gut feeling as well when this whole CHQ business played out. Ask Toilet Duck (when hes done being banned AGAIN), he says he saw models of E170s in COEX colors in the uniform office at RAH Lets not forget, CAL is still in contract negotiations with ALPA. Just because they haven't caved on scope YET, doesn't mean it won't happen. Theres nothing stopping CAL from pointing at a loss and saying "we can't raise pay or improve workrules unless you give up scope". I hope theres enough guys at CAL who aren't willing to give up scope for larger jets but you just never know. I hate to dig up the ancient past, but CAL is known for having a lot of very short sighted, selfish individuals on property.

In reality, this whole mess is just aggravated by the clash of egos. Larry Kellner is unhappy because he can't push us around and Jim Ream is annoyed that Kellner (and others) don't see the value that our product has. Its no secret, Kellner doesn't give a rip about quality. In fact, since taking over Larry has done very little to improve the quality of the Continental product and has taken great strides to erode that quality like the whole CHQ debacle, removing meals from a lot of flights (what happened to "meals at meal time"? When does Larry Kellner ever eat!?) and anybody else hear the rumor that they are removing the video screens from the the 737s? When you see it from the perspective of a group who has done nothing but their very best to provide the utmost level of quality and service just to be kicked to the curb, it can be very frustrating and disheartening.

I really hope the guys at CAL stand their ground on scope, it's already gotten out of hand. The last thing we need is more of those stupid 70+ seat RJs on Regional carrier certificates. I think commuters should go back to just turbo-props, and get rid of the stinkin RJs.

Judging by the size, I'd say he eats all the time.
Reply
Old 04-28-2008 | 05:36 AM
  #24  
Pdt's Btch's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat, EMB-145/140/135
Default

Bryan Bedford wouldn't have done the deal with CAL if it was a money losing project, thats not the way he does business. He would never take a loss for the possible opportunity to fly 170s for CAL.

Same thing happend when Frontier filed, they wanted us to fly at a loss and BB said "F, this, I'm out!" He doesn't play the traditional airline game of losing money just to have planes in the sky.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CAL EWR
Major
14
09-27-2007 05:36 AM
Ellen
Regional
193
09-21-2007 06:11 PM
TipTip35
Major
42
09-08-2007 03:17 PM
CAL EWR
Major
7
08-07-2007 11:49 AM
muleskinner
Hiring News
3
09-14-2005 07:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices