Express Jet furloughing 350 pilots?
#61
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
It would be our flying until June 2009 when our CPA expires. Then it would be canceled and Skywest would just take it over at that point. This has been posted by actual Skywest pilots, not anti-Skywest posters. I fairly certain a ton of Skywest guys would love to get their hands on that LAX Delta base, even if they have to wait for our CPA to expire in 2009.
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
reading comprehension? i read enough to know that what you were saying was incorrect in this instance. So you post incorrect info and get all pouty when someone that knows more about whats going on politely corrects you.... NICE
#63
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
EWRblows, what exactly is incorrect? The initial Skywest deal is gone. The pilots never had a say in it and never will. It is GONE. Finished. XJT BOD turned it down. Front line employees didn't get a single word in. As far as I can tell, front line employees didn't know about it 'til the SEC filing.
Sure the union is getting all stirred up now, as well they should be, but they are already at least five months behind, if not more. In another way, they are far ahead thanks to the foresight of earlier pilots that negotiated scope. Keeping scope intact should prevent some of the nastier side-effects of a purchase or merger. Scope doesn't prevent a purchase or merger. Scope only addresses what happens AFTER a purchase or merger.
Skywest, in the initial offer, which was declined and thus no longer exists, decided to make Scope an issue in their purchasing decision, they could have just as easily not mentioned anything about Scope.
The union doesn't get to determine who buys what corporation. I have yet to see anywhere in the contract where the pilot group gets a vote on mergers or outright purchases. If it is in there, please cite the section and paragraph.
BTW, my comprehension statement was directed to our man of many words in this thread, Superpilot92.
Sure the union is getting all stirred up now, as well they should be, but they are already at least five months behind, if not more. In another way, they are far ahead thanks to the foresight of earlier pilots that negotiated scope. Keeping scope intact should prevent some of the nastier side-effects of a purchase or merger. Scope doesn't prevent a purchase or merger. Scope only addresses what happens AFTER a purchase or merger.
Skywest, in the initial offer, which was declined and thus no longer exists, decided to make Scope an issue in their purchasing decision, they could have just as easily not mentioned anything about Scope.
The union doesn't get to determine who buys what corporation. I have yet to see anywhere in the contract where the pilot group gets a vote on mergers or outright purchases. If it is in there, please cite the section and paragraph.
BTW, my comprehension statement was directed to our man of many words in this thread, Superpilot92.
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
As far as which direction their next offer goes, who knows? Maybe they will play hardball and basically tell our MEC to jump in a lake and deal with the legal fall out later. OR, go the other route and try to negotiate something that minimizes furloughs, or delay them as long as possible. Just examples.
#66
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
EWRblows, what exactly is incorrect? The initial Skywest deal is gone. The pilots never had a say in it and never will. It is GONE. Finished. XJT BOD turned it down. Front line employees didn't get a single word in. As far as I can tell, front line employees didn't know about it 'til the SEC filing.
Sure the union is getting all stirred up now, as well they should be, but they are already at least five months behind, if not more. In another way, they are far ahead thanks to the foresight of earlier pilots that negotiated scope. Keeping scope intact should prevent some of the nastier side-effects of a purchase or merger. Scope doesn't prevent a purchase or merger. Scope only addresses what happens AFTER a purchase or merger.
Skywest, in the initial offer, which was declined and thus no longer exists, decided to make Scope an issue in their purchasing decision, they could have just as easily not mentioned anything about Scope.
The union doesn't get to determine who buys what corporation. I have yet to see anywhere in the contract where the pilot group gets a vote on mergers or outright purchases. If it is in there, please cite the section and paragraph.
BTW, my comprehension statement was directed to our man of many words in this thread, Superpilot92.
Sure the union is getting all stirred up now, as well they should be, but they are already at least five months behind, if not more. In another way, they are far ahead thanks to the foresight of earlier pilots that negotiated scope. Keeping scope intact should prevent some of the nastier side-effects of a purchase or merger. Scope doesn't prevent a purchase or merger. Scope only addresses what happens AFTER a purchase or merger.
Skywest, in the initial offer, which was declined and thus no longer exists, decided to make Scope an issue in their purchasing decision, they could have just as easily not mentioned anything about Scope.
The union doesn't get to determine who buys what corporation. I have yet to see anywhere in the contract where the pilot group gets a vote on mergers or outright purchases. If it is in there, please cite the section and paragraph.
BTW, my comprehension statement was directed to our man of many words in this thread, Superpilot92.

WRONG WRONG, in the initial offer of 3.50 a share it was still dependent on the changing of the contract, which can ONLY BE CHANGED BY.........................................THE PILOTS (or BK judge). SkyWest could just go out and buy us, but it would be under one seniority list, which they dont want (whipsaw)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



