What happend to working for a job and not paying for one? This is getting rediculous
#11
AOPA isn't about being an airline pilot. It's about being a pilot. Most of the articles in there are focused on the aircraft owner or private pilot. They very seldom do an article on anything larger than a citation. Flying is the magazine that targets those with stars in their eyes. Looking at the three most recent issues of AOPA Pilot that I could find, there were a total of 5 ads (all smaller than a half page) from DCA and some unheard of program in Florida.
What were the articles about? Well, the first one had a neat retrospective on the J-3 Cub. December's was a DC-3 (getting closer). Good article in the January issue about the PC-12 too. But guess what, it's geared towards somebody who could afford that aircraft. The only recent article that had anything relating to transport category flying was a piece on corporate flying clubs that featured Boeing Flying Club's 172 posed next to a 773 with a number of Boeing employees smiling for the camera.
I only have one student right now who has dreams of flying an airliner. The other 8 are all in their 40s to 50s, and finally have the time and means needed to persue a dream of being a private pilot, are finishing up on something they started back in their 20s as a hobby, or are dusting off a 15 year old rating.
How many of you have ever read an AOPA magazine or looked at their website?
What were the articles about? Well, the first one had a neat retrospective on the J-3 Cub. December's was a DC-3 (getting closer). Good article in the January issue about the PC-12 too. But guess what, it's geared towards somebody who could afford that aircraft. The only recent article that had anything relating to transport category flying was a piece on corporate flying clubs that featured Boeing Flying Club's 172 posed next to a 773 with a number of Boeing employees smiling for the camera.
I only have one student right now who has dreams of flying an airliner. The other 8 are all in their 40s to 50s, and finally have the time and means needed to persue a dream of being a private pilot, are finishing up on something they started back in their 20s as a hobby, or are dusting off a 15 year old rating.
How many of you have ever read an AOPA magazine or looked at their website?
#12
Originally Posted by Pilotpip
How many of you have ever read an AOPA magazine or looked at their website?
AOPA has fewer such ads because their reader base is different, but they have enough to not want to irritate the big schools.
#13
Originally Posted by Pilotpip
I only have one student right now who has dreams of flying an airliner.
How many of you have ever read an AOPA magazine or looked at their website?
How many of you have ever read an AOPA magazine or looked at their website?
I read the magazine but don't look at their web site. AOPA has pretty pictures of airplanes, that's all I get out of it. But you're right, AOPA might not be the place for an informationa video on the aviation career path. But it's definitely something that should be out there. I'd do it if I was on the other side of the fence. Hopefully pilots on this board who have experienced the regional rape experience can take lead on it.
#14
Doctors pay for med school. Lawyers pay for law school. It is ok for pilots to pay to money to get trained.
Where I agree with the original post is the pilot academies. I looked at some pilot academies (Raa, Mesa, FlightSafety, PanAm, Comair), and the fact was I was paying MUCH more for the same aircraft, MUCH more for the instructor, and MUCH LESS flying for the same amount of money as an FBO. Would you spend an extra $40,000 on a "guarenteed interview." Not me.
Where I agree with the original post is the pilot academies. I looked at some pilot academies (Raa, Mesa, FlightSafety, PanAm, Comair), and the fact was I was paying MUCH more for the same aircraft, MUCH more for the instructor, and MUCH LESS flying for the same amount of money as an FBO. Would you spend an extra $40,000 on a "guarenteed interview." Not me.
#15
Originally Posted by Flying Ninja
Save that poor kid's soul and vere him away from a flying career.
I read the magazine but don't look at their web site. AOPA has pretty pictures of airplanes, that's all I get out of it. But you're right, AOPA might not be the place for an informationa video on the aviation career path. But it's definitely something that should be out there. I'd do it if I was on the other side of the fence. Hopefully pilots on this board who have experienced the regional rape experience can take lead on it.
I read the magazine but don't look at their web site. AOPA has pretty pictures of airplanes, that's all I get out of it. But you're right, AOPA might not be the place for an informationa video on the aviation career path. But it's definitely something that should be out there. I'd do it if I was on the other side of the fence. Hopefully pilots on this board who have experienced the regional rape experience can take lead on it.
There's nothing wrong with glossy pictures of airplanes in a magazine about flying. I don't see how a Mooney Ovation threatens your job. I like the fact that they have been fighting tooth and nail to keep the FAA from being privatized (look at how well that's worked in canada) as well as trying to elimiate some airspace restrictions that have harmed the industry like the DC ADIZ.
I've said it once, I'll say it again. Rather than blaming these young, starry-eyed ones for destroying the industry take a proactive approach and get them on our side.
#16
Originally Posted by ryane946
Doctors pay for med school. Lawyers pay for law school. It is ok for pilots to pay to money to get trained.
Where I agree with the original post is the pilot academies. I looked at some pilot academies (Raa, Mesa, FlightSafety, PanAm, Comair), and the fact was I was paying MUCH more for the same aircraft, MUCH more for the instructor, and MUCH LESS flying for the same amount of money as an FBO. Would you spend an extra $40,000 on a "guarenteed interview." Not me.
Where I agree with the original post is the pilot academies. I looked at some pilot academies (Raa, Mesa, FlightSafety, PanAm, Comair), and the fact was I was paying MUCH more for the same aircraft, MUCH more for the instructor, and MUCH LESS flying for the same amount of money as an FBO. Would you spend an extra $40,000 on a "guarenteed interview." Not me.
#17
Pilotpip, couldn't agree with you more. If something isn't going the way you would like it to, before you start complaining, ask yourself, "what have I done to improve this situation?" If the answer is "nothing", then I recommend you stop complaining and start taking the initiative to improve things. Too often we sit back and complain and expect others to fix our problems for us. Look at the Katrina disaster. You would have thought that people were completely helpless there. Complaining the gov't wasn't giving them enough money, or help, or folding their laundry for them. Anyways, I say support others' dreams and good will come back to you, regardless of what happens to them. The complaining I read on these forums can be summed up in one word..."Pollution". That is all it does to help the aviation industry by polluting communication channels like APC Forums with complaints and envious bashing of other peoples endeavors.
#18
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
Thanks for the feedback fellas, I was just making sure most were on the same page as I. like I said being an airline pilot (at least for me) isnt exactly what I thought, I mean I love it, but 6-8 legs a day flying through the weather picking up tons of ice, ground holds at LGA, though is an invaluable experince, is work! I feel that most of us at the regional level would love to fly something larger than a 90 seat rj (hey, im in a 34pax T-prop so no disrespect to the rj drivers) but lets face it the only way to get on with a major is through years of hard work and gaining experience, I just wish the Regionals were the same (not as strict of course) I know of no "bridge" program to CAL's 737 or Southwests, its all about paying our dues and working long miserable days and getting screwed by crew scheduling. So when these people come out of some program with 500hrs and they feel they have earned themselves a job flying 121, they need to get a grip!.... and to the post above that said I was "angry" it's not anger, Im just trying to understand, and i meant no offense to anybody.
Hey SAAbaroowski,
When did you interview and get hired? I was there Nov 18 for an interview. I am kind of curious as to how some like it there. I thought it was a pretty good operation just long flying days and no per diem was kind of a turn off for me but, I would have taken job if it was offered.
#20
Originally Posted by Pilotpip
I've said it once, I'll say it again. Rather than blaming these young, starry-eyed ones for destroying the industry take a proactive approach and get them on our side.
I don't have any problems with AOPA's magazine. Like I said, I like the pretty pictures.
Originally Posted by FutureATP
If something isn't going the way you would like it to, before you start complaining, ask yourself, "what have I done to improve this situation?"
Dream chasing can be deadly and expensive.
Last edited by Flying Ninja; 02-24-2006 at 09:32 AM.