Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Big cuts for Eagle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2008 | 08:03 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Default

Force majure.
oil 140 per barrel.
jet fuel 6 dollars.
Reply
Old 06-27-2008 | 05:38 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by FOblondie
Yes and you're always very mysterious as to how you know that. I want to see it for myself. Plus that number was awhile ago and since a lot of those guys were still in training I'm assuming quite a few aren't there anymore.


Go to the ALPA website, log in, go to the MEC page, click on crewmember links & resources, look around a little and you will find the interactive seniority list. You can slip your number in, and see where you will end up seniority wise at other bases.

Hope this helps.
Reply
Old 06-27-2008 | 05:41 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by Bond
ISad time in our industry, it looks like anyone hired in the past 12 months is in jeopardy at any regional

just about anybody hired in the last 12 months, probably should consider themselves lucky to have even had the chance to go to a part 121 training program. The last time the airlines hired such low time pilots, (and it was only a few airlines that did) was back in the 60's.
Reply
Old 06-27-2008 | 05:44 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

deleted by original poster

Last edited by Mason32; 06-27-2008 at 05:50 AM.
Reply
Old 06-27-2008 | 05:45 AM
  #45  
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: G550 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
CHQ? You mean RAH? I didn't even know they flew for AA.

LAX-SBP is a good route for SKW, much like SFO-SBP. I wonder if SKW will up frequency to cover Eagles absence.
That’s too bad; I’m going to miss racing Eagles Saabs around SoCal.
You sound like you are actually glad this might be happening. I have to agree with Deez340 on this one, though not surprised coming from you. FYI, though, it is highly unlikely Skywest will get any more business from AA or any other majors. Last thing a major airline need is making an already overgrown regional like Skywest get even bigger.
If American Eagle gets minimized so will other regionals like Skywest. NWA/DAL has already made their intentions that they intend to keep their regionals manageable.

Last edited by Lighteningspeed; 06-27-2008 at 05:50 AM.
Reply
Old 06-27-2008 | 05:47 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by bryris
This may have already been mentioned....

However, first off, what is good for one isn't good for another. We at TSA are screwed with potentially 100 pilots furloughed because of this, while the Eagle guys are happy. No hard feelings at all to the Eagle guys, its just the way life works and we'll suck it up.

However, we operate 16 AA airplanes, with 10 gone soon, our AA operation will be about the same as our Airways operation. However, this may???? be a good thing because it loosens AA's grip on us as regards that 50 seat scope clause. Perhaps if we ditch AA flying, we can begin to get 70 seaters on the TSA side, merge seniority lists with GoJet (that will be a big cluster to arrange) and operate primarily as a United feeder. But, then again, if United goes TU, we're done.
As long as you have 1 airplane on contract to AMR, you are limited to 50 seats. If Eagle takes their 10 planes, you'll still have six planes too many to get bigger planes. Besides, you don't want bigger planes, and the sooner the newer generation of pilots realize this, the sooner you'll understand that the company will get the bigger planes one way or another. They can either create more crappy jobs at places like TSA, or they can create more mainline jobs.... which would you rather have?
Reply
Old 06-27-2008 | 05:49 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by SharkyBN584
It's actually a TWA contract with a merger clause. When AA bought TWA, our contract was allowed to run it's course (which confuses a lot of Eagle guys who seem to think it's "their" flying but that's another story). If there was a performance issue (which there isn't) they could drop us that way. Or if AA goes into bankruptcy, they could drop us that way. The reason TSA is being dragged over the coals is because they have actual AMR aircraft that they're using. Our aircraft are either ours or part of a third party lease (the bank owns them). AMR can't just retire some of their airplanes and take some of ours to replace them because they're not their airframes and never were.

The common feeling is that both parties will part ways when the contract is up in 2013ish.
Do you guys have ACARS?
Reply
Old 06-27-2008 | 06:04 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
just about anybody hired in the last 12 months, probably should consider themselves lucky to have even had the chance to go to a part 121 training program. The last time the airlines hired such low time pilots, (and it was only a few airlines that did) was back in the 60's.
Amen! When I started at EGL many moons ago, I had about 1800tt and 800multi. I was by far the lowest time guy in my class. That being said I wouldn't wish furlough on anyone. Even ungrateful, clueless, 250hr guy with his grossly overdeveloped sense of entitlement.
Reply
Old 06-27-2008 | 06:07 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
As long as you have 1 airplane on contract to AMR, you are limited to 50 seats. If Eagle takes their 10 planes, you'll still have six planes too many to get bigger planes. Besides, you don't want bigger planes, and the sooner the newer generation of pilots realize this, the sooner you'll understand that the company will get the bigger planes one way or another. They can either create more crappy jobs at places like TSA, or they can create more mainline jobs.... which would you rather have?
Amen again! Mason battin' 1.000! And yes I held this opinion when I was a dues earning commuter pilot.
Reply
Old 06-27-2008 | 07:34 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Default

They can either create more crappy jobs at places like TSA, or they can create more mainline jobs.... which would you rather have?
Yeah but here's the problem with that utopian statement, what about the mesa's of the world? As long as any regional is flying 700/900 anybody that isn't is just a moron. Yea we'd all rather be earning mainline wages but there's no way to do that since like it or not those type of airframes ARE being flown at the regionals.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brown
Cargo
5
06-03-2008 11:05 AM
multipilot
Hangar Talk
6
12-02-2007 06:58 AM
Sir James
Major
1
01-05-2006 07:59 PM
Sir James
Major
0
09-23-2005 09:21 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-23-2005 10:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices