Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
turboprop pic or jet pic? >

turboprop pic or jet pic?


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

turboprop pic or jet pic?

Old 03-08-2006 | 04:26 PM
  #11  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,149
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by WEACLRS
Rick - can you take a stab at whether you think they had PIC experience (capt's) or were FO's that wanted to move to a jet?

We do get a number of FO's at Colgan that stay for a few months and then get hired at an RJ carrier. The ones that are under 22 I can't blame - they might as well go and sit in a jet until they can upgrade - second year pay is better. But I try to talk the older ones out of it because turbine PIC time is so important and our upgrades have been fairly quick. I hope I'm not doing them a disservice.

That said we've also had a few "marginal" guys (for lack of a better term) that I think get nervous with the short upgrade times here and they jump ship...only to run square into their piloting weakness at the next stop. I can think of two that went ExpressJet. One I know didn't make it (he wanted me to recommend him back into Colgan) and I sure hope the other has found another career.
It seems to be always prop captains going to jet CA or FO, probably because it's hard to stay in turboprops for long without upgrading. I don't think it could be a pilot quality thing, initial aircaft assignments are random.
Reply
Old 03-08-2006 | 04:40 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: 737/FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It seems to be always prop captains going to jet CA or FO, probably because it's hard to stay in turboprops for long without upgrading. I don't think it could be a pilot quality thing, initial aircaft assignments are random.
Are you referring to internal company upgrades and transistions, or to outside new hires?

Do you think it's related to the automation (FMS, glass, etc) or ?? I spend my days slash alpha. The SAAB has a great autopilot and good EADI and EFIS, but otherwise it's dual nav/coms, DME's, and an ADF. I'm curious if you (or anyone else) thinks the lack of FMS style PIC time is of any real concern or, if one is competent generally, those skills can be readily picked up in training.

We have had a few of captain upgrades fail recently for "soft skills" - lack of command authority. Call it seasoning or whatever, but guys aren't ready when the call comes. Our FAA ACPM has indicated this is a problem the FAA is concerned about at a number of regional airlines. Are you guys seeing any of this too? I'm inclined to chalk it up to the quick upgrade...

Last edited by WEACLRS; 03-08-2006 at 04:42 PM.
Reply
Old 03-08-2006 | 04:52 PM
  #13  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,149
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by WEACLRS
Are you referring to internal company upgrades and transistions, or to outside new hires?

Do you think it's related to the automation (FMS, glass, etc) or ?? I spend my days slash alpha. The SAAB has a great autopilot and good EADI and EFIS, but otherwise it's dual nav/coms, DME's, and an ADF. I'm curious if you (or anyone else) thinks the lack of FMS style PIC time is of any real concern or, if one is competent generally, those skills can be readily picked up in training.

We have had a few of captain upgrades fail recently for "soft skills" - lack of command authority. Call it seasoning or whatever, but guys aren't ready when the call comes. Our FAA ACPM has indicated this is a problem the FAA is concerned about at a number of regional airlines. Are you guys seeing any of this too? I'm inclined to chalk it up to the quick upgrade...
Company upgrades from small turboprops (non-auto-pilot) to RJ, any seat. It's weird, I actually don't understand it. Maybe it's just difficult to break out of hand flying/steam guage mind-set into glass/FMS. I guess the point I'm making is if you're on turbo-props now, don't expect a slam-dunk transition into the RJ.
Reply
Old 03-08-2006 | 05:01 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: 737/FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
...Maybe it's just difficult to break out of hand flying/steam guage mind-set into glass/FMS. I guess the point I'm making is if you're on turbo-props now, don't expect a slam-dunk transition into the RJ.
Yea, I'll buy that. I think we get set in our ways, get comfortable, and maybe don't give training for a new aircraft the attention and respect it deserves. It's a lot of new material that hasn't been seen before (automation, FMS, etc), and just a few sim sessions to get it down. And there's no relaxing the check ride standards, especially for a captain. I know a senior USAir captain that flew the DC-9 for years. When it went away he tried to transistion first to the A320 and then A330. Failed them both. We have a few 1900 captains that have transistioned to the SAAB that still won't use the autopilot.

Last edited by WEACLRS; 03-08-2006 at 05:04 PM.
Reply
Old 03-08-2006 | 05:18 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Default

I'm sure some T-prop guys had trouble with the transition but I bet the same amount of jet guys would have trouble with the turbo prop.
Reply
Old 03-08-2006 | 06:20 PM
  #16  
Freightpuppy's Avatar
Freightmama!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 0
From: 757/767 FO
Default

I went from the Saab to the A320......I didn't have a problem. I thought it was a really smooth transition.
Reply
Old 03-08-2006 | 09:09 PM
  #17  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,149
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by beeker
I'm sure some T-prop guys had trouble with the transition but I bet the same amount of jet guys would have trouble with the turbo prop.
I'd be scrambling for sure, but I've been there before and you do have more time, and you can feel the airplane.
Reply
Old 03-09-2006 | 04:31 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WEACLRS
Thanks for correcting me...I'd like to know if any of our guys have left for an RJ. Was he a 1900 captain?
Pretty sure he was on the saab.
Reply
Old 03-09-2006 | 05:17 PM
  #19  
UPSAv8tr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Z F/O
Default

I went from a Saab to a an A300 (with a stint on the DC8 panel in between) and had no problem with the training. Not sure where the problem lies.

A for the original question, get the PIC time first!!!!!! And don't ever get comfortable till your at your TRUE goal airline.
Reply
Old 03-10-2006 | 04:06 AM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fosters
AWAC is not the "career" place is used to be. Switching to the US Air flying has killed productivity and made the schedules horrible for the commuters, with an average of 13 days off a month compared to what used to be 17-18 days off a month.

Get the PIC time, it'll help you later in life. A career at a regional isn't viable, unless you like being on pins and needles and don't mind moving every year.

thanks to everyone for the answers.
fosters, aren't the schedules better than you guys are not understaffed anymore( they stopped hiring , so i suppose you guys are staffed properly now.)
can you eleaborate a little about AWAc please?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BlueSun
Cargo
23
05-04-2006 11:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices