![]() |
CL-65 is the technically correct way to log all CRJ time.
I suppose it's remotely possible that you might need to break them out at an interview someday...you could CL-65/9 I suppose. |
I logged mine CRJ2 or CRJ7. I didn't get a single question about it during my interviews. It is your logbook, just look it how you wish.
|
CL-65
(then add a comment in the notes/remark section for -900, -200 etc.) |
Originally Posted by Seattlecfi
(Post 453230)
I logged mine CRJ2 or CRJ7. I didn't get a single question about it during my interviews. It is your logbook, just look it how you wish.
|
Originally Posted by mooney
(Post 453217)
My type rating says CL-65 for the -200 and -900. So I am going to put CL-65 in my logbook. However, it is YOUR logbook
In my experience during interviews with other airlines, CRJ2 requires no explanations! BTW- if you use LogTen software, it keys on the FAA Type (CL2, B737, etc) and fills out all the relevant A/C information for you (Type required, >55K lbs, etc.). That's what got me in the habit. |
CL-65 but in remarks I may have (next to the flight number) the CR9/CR7/CR2 detail if I flew multiple variations. Only reason is I believe the 900 qualifies different if you ever look to transfer ratings to ICAO or JAA. I don't know all the details but there is a weight thing in there somewhere. I only fly the -200 so under type I put CL-65 and within logbook pro it lists the aircraft as CL-65 (CL-6002B19) which currently is easy since the 200 is the only Jet time I have.
|
Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL
(Post 453280)
Easy there, chief. It says CL-65 on my type rating too. All of my PIC hours are in the -200.
In my experience during interviews with other airlines, CRJ2 requires no explanations! BTW- if you use LogTen software, it keys on the FAA Type (CL2, B737, etc) and fills out all the relevant A/C information for you (Type required, >55K lbs, etc.). That's what got me in the habit. |
yeah I can't figure out what I said that required a "easy there chief" comeback :) unless he thought my "buddy" was directed at him but if you read the context it is not.....the world may never know!
|
The only people that would care would be the interviewers at Cathay Pacific. Oh, and when you fly a "next gen" 900, log that as a note because they will want to know how much of each....lmao.
|
Originally Posted by PILOTGUY
(Post 453357)
The only people that would care would be the interviewers at Cathay Pacific. Oh, and when you fly a "next gen" 900, log that as a note because they will want to know how much of each....lmao.
(sarcasm for those who don't realize it...) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:57 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands