Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Logging CRJ time (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/30537-logging-crj-time.html)

rickair7777 08-31-2008 08:41 AM

CL-65 is the technically correct way to log all CRJ time.

I suppose it's remotely possible that you might need to break them out at an interview someday...you could CL-65/9 I suppose.

Seattlecfi 08-31-2008 08:53 AM

I logged mine CRJ2 or CRJ7. I didn't get a single question about it during my interviews. It is your logbook, just look it how you wish.

JetAV8er 08-31-2008 09:16 AM

CL-65

(then add a comment in the notes/remark section for -900, -200 etc.)

rickair7777 08-31-2008 09:28 AM


Originally Posted by Seattlecfi (Post 453230)
I logged mine CRJ2 or CRJ7. I didn't get a single question about it during my interviews. It is your logbook, just look it how you wish.

The reality is nobody should care unless you get a detail-freak at an interview. Just don't act like your 900 time was somehow better than 200 time :eek:

MatthewAMEL 08-31-2008 10:11 AM


Originally Posted by mooney (Post 453217)
My type rating says CL-65 for the -200 and -900. So I am going to put CL-65 in my logbook. However, it is YOUR logbook

Easy there, chief. It says CL-65 on my type rating too. All of my PIC hours are in the -200.

In my experience during interviews with other airlines, CRJ2 requires no explanations!

BTW- if you use LogTen software, it keys on the FAA Type (CL2, B737, etc) and fills out all the relevant A/C information for you (Type required, >55K lbs, etc.). That's what got me in the habit.

higney85 08-31-2008 10:21 AM

CL-65 but in remarks I may have (next to the flight number) the CR9/CR7/CR2 detail if I flew multiple variations. Only reason is I believe the 900 qualifies different if you ever look to transfer ratings to ICAO or JAA. I don't know all the details but there is a weight thing in there somewhere. I only fly the -200 so under type I put CL-65 and within logbook pro it lists the aircraft as CL-65 (CL-6002B19) which currently is easy since the 200 is the only Jet time I have.

sigep_nm 08-31-2008 10:23 AM


Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL (Post 453280)
Easy there, chief. It says CL-65 on my type rating too. All of my PIC hours are in the -200.

In my experience during interviews with other airlines, CRJ2 requires no explanations!

BTW- if you use LogTen software, it keys on the FAA Type (CL2, B737, etc) and fills out all the relevant A/C information for you (Type required, >55K lbs, etc.). That's what got me in the habit.

Thanks for the info guys, however I cant believe this thread reached two pages and in someway or another actually created an argument of sorts.

mooney 08-31-2008 11:14 AM

yeah I can't figure out what I said that required a "easy there chief" comeback :) unless he thought my "buddy" was directed at him but if you read the context it is not.....the world may never know!

PILOTGUY 08-31-2008 01:23 PM

The only people that would care would be the interviewers at Cathay Pacific. Oh, and when you fly a "next gen" 900, log that as a note because they will want to know how much of each....lmao.

higney85 08-31-2008 01:32 PM


Originally Posted by PILOTGUY (Post 453357)
The only people that would care would be the interviewers at Cathay Pacific. Oh, and when you fly a "next gen" 900, log that as a note because they will want to know how much of each....lmao.

Not only is it CRJ HEAVY time its also "long haul international" when you go to the carribean, canada, and mexico. Plus, in the unemployment line you can say you flew the big iron!




(sarcasm for those who don't realize it...)


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands