Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Q400 question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2008 | 05:09 PM
  #11  
usmc-sgt's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 42
Default

The Q does have a yawdamper but because its a prop you are all over the rudders on any power change and climbs and descents.

I thought I was all done with
P factor
Accelerated slipstream
Spiraling slipstream
Torque
Reply
Old 09-13-2008 | 05:10 PM
  #12  
EmbraerFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

They are roughly the same, similar features with different names for some of the modes. The Q400 has some features that the RJ's don't have like coupled Vpath. You pretty much fly every approach like an ILS in the Q400 except circling approaches in the FMS database. There will be a glide slope/path to almost every runway. I've used both and there were things i liked about the automation on the Q400 and things i didnt like. As mentioned before, it does a crappy job of tracking the LOC. The Q400 is capable of single engine CATIII.
Reply
Old 09-13-2008 | 05:15 PM
  #13  
willflyforcash's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: A320 starboard... Arrrr
Default

hot ride! makes our ATRs look like old cessnas.
Reply
Old 09-13-2008 | 05:56 PM
  #14  
coldpilot's Avatar
DisplAAced
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 FO
Default

Originally Posted by willflyforcash
hot ride! makes our ATRs look like old cessnas.
I'd give the ATR at least Bonanza status, at least there is a some automation in it. Now the SAAB is rocking it Cessna style. That think is a switch... well you know SAAB drivers know what I mean.
Reply
Old 09-13-2008 | 06:30 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by coldpilot
I'd give the ATR at least Bonanza status, at least there is a some automation in it. Now the SAAB is rocking it Cessna style. That think is a switch... well you know SAAB drivers know what I mean.
Never flew the SAAB, but I heard the autopilot on it is rock solid.
Reply
Old 09-13-2008 | 07:06 PM
  #16  
teamdothis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: EFFO (eternally furloughed First Officer)
Default

Originally Posted by usmc-sgt
It looks nothing at all like the older CRJs, although the screen size is similiar with the 900s. Not sure about the RJ autopilot but the Qs is junk. You can give it a 5 degree intercept and it will still fly through the loc and will not lock on to it until the FAF. It is also not three axis so you are kicking rudders all day.

As far as automation, again I do not know much about the CRJs but I would say it may be better. It does all the usual except has no autothrottles. Your question is a little vague though, what specifically are you looking for?

(I have no idea why this RJ photo wont show up. Here is the link anyway)

nothing in particular mostly just idle curiosity, im driving an RJ and was thinkin about changing companies and the Q is in the line up for a few of them. Was just wondering if in making the change and got the 400 how much would i feel at home on a new flight deck.
Reply
Old 09-13-2008 | 07:07 PM
  #17  
teamdothis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: EFFO (eternally furloughed First Officer)
Default

I know some A/C builders stick to whats been workin for them as far as lay out
Reply
Old 09-13-2008 | 07:20 PM
  #18  
Splanky's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Moving backwards
Default

I've flown with a bunch of captains that came over from the RJ. Most of them curse the Q400 the entire time they are flying; must have been spoiled by the 'barbie-jet'. We can do some pretty neat gee-wiz stuff with the QX Q400s (megawhackers). They are actually a descent plane if they would just be little more reliable.
Reply
Old 09-13-2008 | 08:08 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by Splanky
I've flown with a bunch of captains that came over from the RJ. Most of them curse the Q400 the entire time they are flying; must have been spoiled by the 'barbie-jet'. We can do some pretty neat gee-wiz stuff with the QX Q400s (megawhackers). They are actually a descent plane if they would just be little more reliable.
Last time I had the pleasure of sharing a crew van with a QX RJ crew, all they did was B!tc# about the Q400. It got old quick...
Reply
Old 09-13-2008 | 08:37 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
Never flew the SAAB, but I heard the autopilot on it is rock solid.
Don't forget about the the radar and yaw damper (which autotrims the rudder)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Valhalla2008
Aviation Law
11
09-21-2008 06:25 AM
captscott26
GoJet
244
08-31-2008 03:06 PM
USMCFLYR
Military
16
08-28-2008 09:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM
Over40
Regional
13
08-06-2008 07:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices