Information about MPD!
#21
Pft
Who's to say where the line of acceptability is between paying for your ratings and paying for your job? Isn't a training contract paying for your job? What about the low wages of being a regional FO it too seems like paying for your job.
In the end we all pay dearly for the career. Some pay with wasted years of their lives others pay in cash. I would highly advise paying in cash. In the long run it is much cheaper.
SKyHigh
In the end we all pay dearly for the career. Some pay with wasted years of their lives others pay in cash. I would highly advise paying in cash. In the long run it is much cheaper.
SKyHigh
#22
Originally Posted by rickair7777
It's a two year program...that is not fast paced. I did my IR, COM, ME , CFI, CFII at a local school in 6 months (already had the PVT). Did the MEI while employed as a CFI.
Ask any of the ab-initio students who came in with a PP or better if it's fast paced or not. By the way, most students who survive the training are start to finish in 15 months, not 24. No summer vacation in Farmtown, bud. AND, these guys get the IR/COM-SE/COM-ME in 4-5 months.
Most of the people commenting on this subject have absolutely no clue what they are talking about. Avoid opinions based in heresay and generalities.
MAPD is a unique training opportunity for a lot of people. It is not PFT (although you could argue that the PACE program is), training takes place in high performance equipment. Could it be done with cheaper equipment? Sure, but at least you aren't paying $200/hr for a 172 w/CFI like some other national flight schools.
Last edited by EngineOut; 04-20-2006 at 07:00 AM.
#23
Originally Posted by EngineOut
MAPD is a unique training opportunity for a lot of people. It is not PFT (although you could argue that the PACE program is), training takes place in high performance equipment. Could it be done with cheaper equipment? Sure, but at least you aren't paying $200/hr for a 172 w/CFI like some other national flight schools.
As I have said before, MAPD is a quality program that performs as advertised...that is very unusual in the flight-training con-game...umm, industry. I am however trying to educate entry level folks as to some of the downsides of PFT which are not obvious to them at this point in their careers. I am not here to bash folks who have already crossed that bridge...that's a waste of valuable keyboard wear & tear.
#24
Originally Posted by fosters
Ok bud. Whatever you say.
Originally Posted by fosters
These guys pay for their flight training (around $45k or so for the private-multi commercial) and receive a job interview in doing so. Can it be done cheaper? Yes, but that's not the argument here...they're not paying MAG for groundschool, and if they don't pass and get kicked to the curb they at least have something to show for it - they still have their commerical multi.
A traditional "PFT" operation is you show up, qualified for the job, but you must fork over $XX,XXX for the training that the employer is required to give you in 135 or 121 ops. This is not the case here. They are paid from day one at mesa. Again, this is not the argument here however.
A traditional "PFT" operation is you show up, qualified for the job, but you must fork over $XX,XXX for the training that the employer is required to give you in 135 or 121 ops. This is not the case here. They are paid from day one at mesa. Again, this is not the argument here however.
Originally Posted by fosters
Would you believe that more of the CFI's wash out percentage wise than the graduates of the program?!?!?
The way to look at is like this:
The CFIs spend a couple years learning the material...most pass the final exam, but a few don't.
The PFT's spend a couple years memorizing the answers to the exam...and then some of them STILL flunk out
Originally Posted by fosters
85% of the US Air EAST pilot group will retire in the next 5 years (assuming age 60 stays the same). There's a LOT of hiring coming up BTW.
Originally Posted by fosters
Instead of jumping on the bandwagon and dissing these guys, open your eyes and you'll find that everywhere you go there are exceptions to the rule. I met a United (MAINLINE) CA a few months ago who knew the CA I was with; this guy was hired at United at the age of 21 with 1000 TT and a few hundred multi after doing an internship there thru his college (NO INSTRUCTING BTW!).
I'm not jumping on ANY bandwagons...right or wrong or somewhere in between, my conclusions are my own and have been formed on-line and in the jumpseats of various other carriers.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
A chimpanzee could pass an RJ sim ride with enough training.
There are ALWAYS exceptions. I'm talking to the average white guy pilot who doesn't have a trust fund, an uncle on the 777, or an affirmative action ticket.
My biggest issue with the low time stuff is that they seperate the pilot group. If you get a lot of low timers in at the airline, those guys want growth and upgrades, not QOL. They will severely handicap the unions' role in trying to get the QOL, pay scales, etc. raised. This is why, IMO, mesa is so hated.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 135
Originally Posted by fosters
.....I helped an AirTran guy brush up in a twin 2 years ago because he was getting placed in a ground school there. 1200TT, 200 multi, all piston from CFI'ing and renting. He worked as a ramp manager at AirTran and they gave him a shot at the 717. Again, no trust fund, a white dude, didn't know anyone in flight ops, etc. etc.
So I don't know how this "guy" you "helped" got that opportunity. Unless he was ex-military with 1000 hrs of jet jockey time or was just pulling your leg.
There have been low time people hired at airlines in the distant past, but it was a different time then, when the industry wasn't saturated with QUALIFIED pilots and the ones that usually got the call tended to be of the "protected" status of employment. I believe they call that "making the quota".
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Originally Posted by directbears
That's a load of sh!t, and I'll stop short of calling you/him a liar.
According to him, the lowest time guy they hired was around 700TT, but he had worked for the company for about 5 years. But you don't believe it, so you don't care I suppose.
Why is it so had to believe?
FedEx has a strong internal hiring policy, too, however you must at least meet the mins prior to interviewing.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 135
Originally Posted by fosters
…..AirTran has/had a very strong internal hiring policy in place. If you don't want to believe it, fine
According to him.....
FedEx has a strong internal hiring policy, too, however you must at least meet the mins prior to interviewing.
Who knows, maybe it is the undeserving that always get the breaks.
#29
Originally Posted by fosters
My biggest issue with the low time stuff is that they seperate the pilot group. If you get a lot of low timers in at the airline, those guys want growth and upgrades, not QOL. They will severely handicap the unions' role in trying to get the QOL, pay scales, etc. raised. This is why, IMO, mesa is so hated.
#30
Well, I just want to thank everyone for the replys. I'm still looking into going to MPD, I know it's a lot of money, but since I'm in the military, I should get financial help! Plus, I have money saved up! Thank you!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F15AvionicsTech
Flight Schools and Training
5
06-03-2006 07:08 AM