Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   CRJ1000 Sighting in ICT... (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/36517-crj1000-sighting-ict.html)

Roper92 02-04-2009 06:21 AM

Does anyone know the range of this new CRJ-1000? I looked on the Bombardier website but the range maps only showed the range for the -700 and (I love it when people call it this:) the -9.

The DC-9 is a long RJ too yes, however, it's a little beefier with stronger engines and MUCH MUCH MUCH higher paid pilots up front.

But you already know that :)

ebl14 02-04-2009 07:34 PM

The CRJ-900 looks stupid as it is, this thing is getting to be re*******diclous. What a goofy looking plane, I bet the guys at mainline will refuse to fly it leaving it to the regionals to scalp what is left of this industry. You heard it here first.

Jayhawk 023 02-04-2009 09:03 PM


Originally Posted by FL450 (Post 551675)
Lear and bombardier does do all their flight testing here and the cosswinds here aren't that bad. Bombardier has a position on their website or at least they did for Senior test pilot. I think all you needed was a type rating in at least one of their products which obviously you should qualify. Also check out Hawker Beech Craft they do a lot of testing as well out of ICT and beech field.

Best of luck

FL450

Hi everyone,

I am originally from Wichita and in regards to the orginal quesiton....when Bombardier purchased the LearJet manufacturing facility in 1990 they also started at flight-test facility there too. It exists for the entire Bombardier Aerospace product line. Over the years I have seen all of the CRJ series, Q400, 415 fire-bomber, Challenger 300, etc, out flying around Wichita. Now that I think about it, I remember being home from college on the summer day in 1993 when one of the original CRJ test aircraft went down west of town, unfortunately taking several lives. Anyway, it is/was the third largest civilian flight test center in the world (after Boeing and Airbus).

In regards to the other manufactures in the area...Hawker Beech and Cessna also have their production flight-test centers at BEC and ICT, respectively. However both manufactures have recently announced significant layoffs. I would be very surprised if either will be hiring any pilots for a long time. Of course those jobs require that you live in Wichita...easy for Kansans but perhaps not for the west coast folks!

FL450 02-04-2009 10:02 PM


Originally Posted by Roper92 (Post 551906)
Does anyone know the range of this new CRJ-1000? I looked on the Bombardier website but the range maps only showed the range for the -700 and (I love it when people call it this:) the -9.

The DC-9 is a long RJ too yes, however, it's a little beefier with stronger engines and MUCH MUCH MUCH higher paid pilots up front.

But you already know that :)

1,610 nautical miles

The CRJ 700 still has the best range out of all the RJ series

Justdoinmyjob 02-05-2009 05:14 AM


Originally Posted by ebl14 (Post 552431)
I bet the guys at mainline will refuse to fly it leaving it to the regionals to scalp what is left of this industry. You heard it here first.

That is a bet you will most certainly lose.

RedBaron007 02-05-2009 10:12 PM

The -900 and -1000 can only be compared to a DC-9 in the number of seats each has. There's little else that can be compared, whether it's comfort, headroom, shoulder room, and cargo room, not to mention others. I find the -700 seats incredibly uncomfortable by the time I arrive in ABE from CLT. I can't even fathom how much my a$$ would hurt flying from CLT to DEN.

PiperPower 02-08-2009 04:38 AM

Gfk
 
I landed right behind the CRJ1000 in GFK today. Not sure why it's up here but it is, and wow is it big. It truly does look huge... doesn't seem right. We heard it on GFK approach and they were referring to it as a CRJ900. I thought it was a Mesaba diversion until we rolled past it when we touched down. Loooooooooong.

BoilerUP 02-08-2009 05:11 AM


Originally Posted by benXJ9er (Post 554125)
Listen buddy. I have taken personal offense to this post. The 900 seats are actually very comfortable. even a huge man can stand in the airplane comfortably. And I ask... have ever even sat in a DC-9? The seats are just as horrible. The 9 is the new end of the line airplane. Get used to it. You're just grumpy because us 9 drivers took your flying.

Weak the flame, in your post is.

undflyboy06 02-08-2009 05:16 AM

Tell you one thing, any longer and it will look like the plane is taking steroids.....I mean the engines look like raisinets compared to the body.

johnso29 02-08-2009 08:54 AM


Originally Posted by benXJ9er (Post 554125)
Listen buddy. I have taken personal offense to this post. The 900 seats are actually very comfortable. even a huge man can stand in the airplane comfortably. And I ask... have ever even sat in a DC-9? The seats are just as horrible. The 9 is the new end of the line airplane. Get used to it. You're just grumpy because us 9 drivers took your flying.



FLAMEBAIT!!!!!!!!!!!!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:56 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands