Frontier gets another 40Mil from RAH

Subscribe
3  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17 
Page 13 of 19
Go to
03-07-2009 | 10:44 AM
  #121  
Quote: BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU SAY. THEY ARE WATCHING YOU
UH-OH! Somebody just knocked on my crashpad door!!!
03-07-2009 | 10:59 AM
  #122  
Quote: What about Cape Air! We're even more oldschool than Lakes.
Cape Air is Classic.. I Love you guys BTW how senior is TISX
03-07-2009 | 11:26 AM
  #123  
Quote: The reality of the environment we operate in, this gen doesn't care about the future, just the instant gratification of flying the mini 737. That's why I think we missed the boat on these guys as far as education. We might still be able to catch the next gen though.
This is exactly right. It might be cool, for a second, to your friends, that you fly a mini 737, or that you fly a jet, period, but that coolness will wear off, quick, when you tell them how much you make.

To the generation of pilots, who is willing to fly mainline aircraft, for crap wages, you may find it cool and you may think you have, "bragging rights", to your friends, and family, but they will be laughing at you, all the way to the bank, as they buy their homes, raise their families, go on vacations, and actually have a retirement to look forward to. Meanwhile, you can fly your 70+ seat, mainline jet, for regional wages, and stay in your crash-pad, eating your top ramon. You'll be cool, though, because you fly a big jet! ROFL!
03-07-2009 | 11:37 AM
  #124  
Quote: This is exactly right. It might be cool, for a second, to your friends, that you fly a mini 737, or that you fly a jet, period, but that coolness will wear off, quick, when you tell them how much you make.

To the generation of pilots, who is willing to fly mainline aircraft, for crap wages, you may find it cool and you may think you have, "bragging rights", to your friends, and family, but they will be laughing at you, all the way to the bank, as they buy their homes, raise their families, go on vacations, and actually have a retirement to look forward to. Meanwhile, you can fly your 70+ seat, mainline jet, for regional wages, and stay in your crash-pad, eating your top ramon. You'll be cool, though, because you fly a big jet! ROFL!
LOL well Said...
03-07-2009 | 11:42 AM
  #125  
Quote: SAAB, the thing is that you won't ever get that chance...cause you will never get out of flying a 50 seater. And when was the last time "your" company gave cash to help the codeshare or another codeshare. To do that you must make money. And seems like we have been doing something right to be making that much money to give out, essentially we have saved many many jobs.

haha. this is good. you should say that to a midwest pilot. then tell me if he slaps you.
03-07-2009 | 01:28 PM
  #126  
Quote: This is exactly right. It might be cool, for a second, to your friends, that you fly a mini 737, or that you fly a jet, period, but that coolness will wear off, quick, when you tell them how much you make.

To the generation of pilots, who is willing to fly mainline aircraft, for crap wages, you may find it cool and you may think you have, "bragging rights", to your friends, and family, but they will be laughing at you, all the way to the bank, as they buy their homes, raise their families, go on vacations, and actually have a retirement to look forward to. Meanwhile, you can fly your 70+ seat, mainline jet, for regional wages, and stay in your crash-pad, eating your top ramon. You'll be cool, though, because you fly a big jet! ROFL!

who says we want to fly this airplane for the wages we are currently getting. Jump on the "Bash RAH" bandwagon! This contract was made before 170s were even on the horizon. Do you understand what I just said? I'll say it again, This contract was voted on before 170s were even on the horizon. Meaning, no one at Chautauqua knew those planes were coming. Back then, it was a Saab operation with 145s coming.

We are not proud of the wages and being that we are in contract negotations, we are going to get compensated for it. I truely hope so. I will do my VERY BEST to spread the word about a better contract. Because upon doing so, then that would mean a better contract for others to shoot for..............even to my XJT brothers and sisters who I love so much (majority of you) Maybe Sobb wont be so bitter.

Until then, leave this argument alone. It isnt worth the fight right now. If 25% of our pilot group votes on the new TA then yes, you can throw mud but until then.

OH GOD PLEASE do not delete this response and hit me with another infraction

ok, Im done with this thread.
03-07-2009 | 02:32 PM
  #127  
Quote: who says we want to fly this airplane for the wages we are currently getting. Jump on the "Bash RAH" bandwagon! This contract was made before 170s were even on the horizon. Do you understand what I just said? I'll say it again, This contract was voted on before 170s were even on the horizon. Meaning, no one at Chautauqua knew those planes were coming. Back then, it was a Saab operation with 145s coming.

We are not proud of the wages and being that we are in contract negotations, we are going to get compensated for it. I truely hope so. I will do my VERY BEST to spread the word about a better contract. Because upon doing so, then that would mean a better contract for others to shoot for..............even to my XJT brothers and sisters who I love so much (majority of you) Maybe Sobb wont be so bitter.

Until then, leave this argument alone. It isnt worth the fight right now. If 25% of our pilot group votes on the new TA then yes, you can throw mud but until then.

OH GOD PLEASE do not delete this response and hit me with another infraction

ok, Im done with this thread.
You voted in a contract that was openended on pay rates for airplane types? What if BB had decided to buy 747s, would you be flying them for the same rate?
03-07-2009 | 03:08 PM
  #128  
A contract should always have a stipulation that if a new aircraft type is added during the life of the CBA, the pay rates will be negotiated for that type before the aircraft comes on property. XJT is a good example of that. The excuse that the 170 wasn't on the horizon is a poor one.

Quote: Cape Air is Classic.. I Love you guys BTW how senior is TISX
Not very. More than one junior person holding that base.
03-07-2009 | 03:35 PM
  #129  
Quote: A contract should always have a stipulation that if a new aircraft type is added during the life of the CBA, the pay rates will be negotiated for that type before the aircraft comes on property. XJT is a good example of that. The excuse that the 170 wasn't on the horizon is a poor one.
So all RAH pilots are losers, even the ones who got hired after said contract was voted on?
03-07-2009 | 04:08 PM
  #130  
Quote: So all RAH pilots are losers, even the ones who got hired after said contract was voted on?
Who said "losers"? I didn't. I just said it was a poor excuse. And if you didn't like the pay rate, you shouldn't have gone there. Pretty simple.
3  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17 
Page 13 of 19
Go to