Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Regional Airline Safety questioned >

Regional Airline Safety questioned

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Regional Airline Safety questioned

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2009 | 07:33 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: 747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed
Hard to believe people like Cohen is the President of the Regional Pilots Association. What Cohen and the FAA refuses to acknowledge is that although low pay and low experience pilots MAY contribute to the deterioration of safety in the airline industry, the SINGLE MOST threat to safety is pilot fatigue directly caused by regional airlines managements' scheduling practices.

One, there should be no CDOs (High speeds) period. They are UNSAFE for anyone. Spoke to several CAs with close to 20,000 hours and they all said it is unsafe even after one high speed turn.

Second, airline management should not be allowed to schedule pairings with overnights less than 10 hours. 10 hour layover is in my opinion a bare MINIMUM necessary for pilots to get adequate rest.

Three, time spent waiting for passengers to deplane, writing up maintenance logs after the flight, leaving the terminal at the end of the day and waiting for the hotel shuttle van should NOT be counted as the REST period. Time for REST PERIOD should start when crews check in at the hotel for the night.
Not picking on you as I wholeheartedly agree with your post. I only point out your innocent typo due to the irony involved. He is president of the Regional Airline Association and certainly doesn't represent pilots.
Reply
Old 05-10-2009 | 07:59 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Satan's Camaro
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
Then you and the rest of your pilots need to call fatigued everytime they schedue somethign like this. If each and every month the flight are delayed and cancelled because crew planning builds a schedule that results in too many fatigue calls.... guess what... the schedule gets changed.
And the fact that you either take that out of your sick time or don't get paid for that time? Regional FOs don't have a whole lot of choices. At a lot of places you will get at least one or two overnights like that a month, and if you only earn 2-4 sick hours per month, then you're spending all of your sick time (or much much more) on fatigue calls. What happens if you're really sick? The real issue is that when making the decision between calling in fatigued or when deciding to go to work for the day, the FO has to decide if the lost pay or lost sick time is worth what will probably result in a relatively safe and violation free day.
Reply
Old 05-11-2009 | 06:37 AM
  #53  
ImEbee's Avatar
Portuguese Troubleshooter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Burrito Bomber
Default

Originally Posted by Purpleanga
I also agree that the FAA has a dirty role in this as well and nobody has challenged them yet considering they can change the duty times immediately if they want. Unfortunately they only go by statistics hopefully this latest static will be enough but I really doubt it.
Originally Posted by saab2000
Why should they? Do you fly less safely because you are not well paid?
Sounds like they have Tyler Durden doing their cost/benefit analysis

Originally Posted by ryeflyer
Of course it's up to the pilot, but what corporate culture do these people work in? Can you really declare that your're fatigued? What's the sick-leave policy like if you've got a heavy cold say?
Originally Posted by boilerpilot
And the fact that you either take that out of your sick time or don't get paid for that time? Regional FOs don't have a whole lot of choices. At a lot of places you will get at least one or two overnights like that a month, and if you only earn 2-4 sick hours per month, then you're spending all of your sick time (or much much more) on fatigue calls. What happens if you're really sick? The real issue is that when making the decision between calling in fatigued or when deciding to go to work for the day, the FO has to decide if the lost pay or lost sick time is worth what will probably result in a relatively safe and violation free day.
Couple that with company policy to put you on sick leave until you have visited a doctor to make sure you are not chronically fatigued.
Reply
Old 05-11-2009 | 08:46 AM
  #54  
Cycle Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
From: DAL Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Copperhed51
True, however after a long day of flying with not enough time to grab a meal, we usually have the taxi/shuttle driver stop off somewhere so we can grab something to go. That eats into my rest. Lately I've been going all day without eating because there's no time and the airports we go to don't have any food to buy. I am always starving and looking forward to my meal after I finish flying. I've been packing pop tarts and other snacks too since that's all I really have time to eat during the day.
You're kidding, right? You go all day without eating? Take a dang meal break!!! Physiological needs are JUST as important as making sure you're well trained. If you're hungry, tired, overly stressed, drunk, or have other problems which prohibit you from putting 100% of your skills towards flying the aircraft, you need to stop and take a break. These airlines don't pay us enough to take risks like that! If the company feels too many flights are being delayed because of crews taking breaks to eat, they'll change the schedule. When I was at Skywest, they started supplying us with "snack boxes" from catering which helped. We could always pull the "take a break" card, though, and eat real food if we needed to. They can't fire you because you took a delay to eat something!!
Reply
Old 05-11-2009 | 08:55 AM
  #55  
ERJ135's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
From: CR7 Capt
Default

At eagle if we take a meal break we can send an acars code 69? I think. Thats a meal break and the delay goes to scheduling.
Reply
Old 05-11-2009 | 09:11 AM
  #56  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 356
Likes: 1
Default Roger Cohen's comments

If you are angered by the comments Roger Cohen made, in defense of some of the sweat shops he represents, you can call his office at the following number like I have just done.

Tel: 202/367-1170

The very nice receptionist told me he was out of the office doing another interview but I left him a pointed voicemail explaining how it was possible for me to come to work tired while doing a 4 day where the 1st day was min rest, 8 hours, all days were at least 12 hours long, and the last day started before 6 am and was scheduled over 15 hours.

This guy is swine.
Reply
Old 05-11-2009 | 09:42 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Beech 1900D
Default

Originally Posted by Copperhed51
True, however after a long day of flying with not enough time to grab a meal, we usually have the taxi/shuttle driver stop off somewhere so we can grab something to go. That eats into my rest. Lately I've been going all day without eating because there's no time and the airports we go to don't have any food to buy. I am always starving and looking forward to my meal after I finish flying. I've been packing pop tarts and other snacks too since that's all I really have time to eat during the day.
Something to think about: if it's a multi day trip, contract says that they should give you 30 minutes for a meal at some point, for duty periods greater than 6 hours, if there was no access to food at the hotel you started at. If they don't have this 30 minutes built into your schedule, take it on your own, and write an info report about it. Explain how you needed to eat for physiological needs/ safety reasons, and that not having the 30 minute meal break was a clear contract violation. If it's a 20 minute turn at a hub, make it 50 in order to satisfy your physiological needs. There is nothing wrong with that, whatsoever. Also, speak to a union rep and CP about the issue, and file a grievance, if it comes to that.
Reply
Old 05-11-2009 | 09:47 AM
  #58  
ImEbee's Avatar
Portuguese Troubleshooter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Burrito Bomber
Default

Originally Posted by ERJ135
At eagle if we take a meal break we can send an acars code 69? I think. Thats a meal break and the delay goes to scheduling.
So when you need something to eat you ask for a 69? I don't ever want to hear another Eagle guy complain again
Reply
Old 05-11-2009 | 10:09 AM
  #59  
Bond's Avatar
Gets Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: On Top
Default

Originally Posted by beech_nut
If you are angered by the comments Roger Cohen made, in defense of some of the sweat shops he represents, you can call his office at the following number like I have just done.

Tel: 202/367-1170

The very nice receptionist told me he was out of the office doing another interview but I left him a pointed voicemail explaining how it was possible for me to come to work tired while doing a 4 day where the 1st day was min rest, 8 hours, all days were at least 12 hours long, and the last day started before 6 am and was scheduled over 15 hours.

This guy is swine.
Well boys and girls, if there was ever any doubt whose side this guy is on, I think we know for sure know. Take a look at this quote from one of his interviews about the Colgan accident:

Roger Cohen, president of the Regional Airline Association, said Colgan's concept is the natural evolution of current safety practices. "If we are identifying cockpit discipline" as an important safety factor and "there is a random, non-punitive way" to sample data, according to Mr. Cohen, "why wouldn't we at least begin talking" about broader uses of cockpit recorders?

This was his quote in response to the ridiculous suggestion by Colgan management to start randomly auditing the CVR tapes. Everyone knows this issue has been brought up before, and everyone including ALPA, the FAA, and the NTSB agreed that it would be counterproductive to safety. For those of you that may not be familiar with it, using CRV as a tracking tool, would undermine NASA, ASAP, and any other self reporting tool available to our pilots. So I guess the guy's just trying to make a name for himself at the expense of our Colgan brothers.
Reply
Old 05-11-2009 | 12:03 PM
  #60  
Groundhog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by beech_nut
If you are angered by the comments Roger Cohen made, in defense of some of the sweat shops he represents, you can call his office at the following number like I have just done.

Tel: 202/367-1170

The very nice receptionist told me he was out of the office doing another interview but I left him a pointed voicemail explaining how it was possible for me to come to work tired while doing a 4 day where the 1st day was min rest, 8 hours, all days were at least 12 hours long, and the last day started before 6 am and was scheduled over 15 hours.

This guy is swine.

Although it probably made you feel better, in the end your call won't mean anything to him. It probably gave him a good chuckle.
He knows the issues, and he knows the safety implications. His job is to spew the RAA talking points. His only mission is to present an adequate defense so that the flying public (read: sheep) will not hold Colgan or the regional airline industry liable for the accident.

Lie, obfuscate and point fingers in the other direction. A classic defense.

Hog
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Justdoinmyjob
Regional
34
06-04-2009 11:05 AM
Ozpilot414
Regional
19
03-11-2009 04:59 PM
Pantera
Regional
21
12-24-2008 08:00 AM
normajean21
Flight Schools and Training
30
10-25-2008 09:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices