Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Aviation Expert slams regional pilots >

Aviation Expert slams regional pilots

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Aviation Expert slams regional pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2009, 08:35 PM
  #41  
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Swedish Blender's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: fins to the left, fins to the right
Posts: 1,730
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Does that include those tac air guys who fly up in Alaska, any of the northern states, Canada. Korea or Japan in the winter, or those fun dets to Norway?
F4 guy. Said he didn't fly to crap weather runways and if so dropped the hook. Never went slip slidin' away
Swedish Blender is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 08:39 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default You will be assimilated...

Originally Posted by HercDriver130 View Post
mil vs. civ who cares as long as they have skills.
That's the bottom line. I could hardly ever tell where a fellow pilot learned to fly until we started chatting about the subject. A really young guy probably had to be civilian-trained, as did the occasional female (until the military started accepting them), but those were the only clues. I think the hiring process and the S/O seat experience worked to "standardize" crewmembers.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 08:46 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mjarosz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: DHC-8 100/300 CA
Posts: 238
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingChipmunk View Post
Must be the YMCA flight training program.
I'd like to see that. I assumed someone would quickly point that the military would not be private flight lessons and how the training would be better. I guess we all know what happens when you assume.
mjarosz is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 09:03 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by SmoothOnTop View Post
Didn't one of those airlines cfit into cali and snap an a300 tail off?
If I remember correctly, Cali was the standard human factors accident with all the accompanying things that usually contribute to said type of event.

The A300 isn't even the same sport, much less the same ballpark. That was a pilot doing EXACTLY as he was trained to do by the airline.

Can't really use that one to make the point.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 10:41 PM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Radar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: MeSAABa
Posts: 79
Default

This Al Yurman guy can't even spell... "much lower coast" ?!? Some expert!

Last edited by Radar; 05-13-2009 at 10:45 PM. Reason: Spelling...
Radar is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 11:58 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Seatownflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Pilot sleeping.
Posts: 615
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
I started out as a civilian trained pilot and then went through a military program. I can tell you the two are worlds apart in quality and instructional tools. You also get to experience many things you will only ever talk about in a civilian program. This is not a knock on civilian pilots. Its simply a statement that the military training is light years ahead of most civilian programs. I had one friend in flight school who had 4000 hours and had been a Captain at a regional. He was astounded at the difference in the training and the things he learned and experienced the civilian programs never give you a shot at. Are there bad military pilots yes. Are there great civilian pilots yes. The training however in general is light years ahead in the military.
Well hey, if the tax payers funded my flight school with an almost unlimited cash flow then I guarantee our training would have been light years ahead of other civilian schools as well. duh.
Seatownflyer is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 01:35 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WhistlePig's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Ending the Backlog one claim at a time
Posts: 486
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
I started out as a civilian trained pilot and then went through a military program. I can tell you the two are worlds apart in quality and instructional tools. You also get to experience many things you will only ever talk about in a civilian program. This is not a knock on civilian pilots. Its simply a statement that the military training is light years ahead of most civilian programs. I had one friend in flight school who had 4000 hours and had been a Captain at a regional. He was astounded at the difference in the training and the things he learned and experienced the civilian programs never give you a shot at. Are there bad military pilots yes. Are there great civilian pilots yes. The training however in general is light years ahead in the military.
I had a similar path and concur. Although I will add that my overall best individual instructors have been on the civilian side (much lower percentage of screamers), the military system provides training opportunities such as acro, out of control flight, bombing, carrier qual, formation flying etc... in mostly high performance aircraft that straight civilian training cannot duplicate without spending $$$$$
WhistlePig is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 01:41 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WhistlePig's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Ending the Backlog one claim at a time
Posts: 486
Default

Originally Posted by Seatownflyer View Post
Well hey, if the tax payers funded my flight school with an almost unlimited cash flow then I guarantee our training would have been light years ahead of other civilian schools as well. duh.
So sacrifice your time, personal freedom, and self determination for the next 12 years get the best training in the world. The airlines might be on an "up" cycle by then.
WhistlePig is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 02:42 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SmoothOnTop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: retired
Posts: 645
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
If I remember correctly, Cali was the standard human factors accident with all the accompanying things that usually contribute to said type of event.

The A300 isn't even the same sport, much less the same ballpark. That was a pilot doing EXACTLY as he was trained to do by the airline.

Can't really use that one to make the point.
Having completed a.a.m.p., I'd say I can make that point, sport.

Read the report or consider this analogy:

Departing a slush covered runway, the crew should make turns to the left and right on climbout to avoid refreezing of the contaminant on the aileron hinges.

Contrast that with "a pilot, doing EXACTLY as he was trained to do by the airline" completing barrel rolls on the departure climb...
SmoothOnTop is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 02:47 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

Originally Posted by mjarosz View Post
Experts who testified during the first day of NTSB hearings said Renslow — who slept in Colgan's flight crew room prior to the flight, violating regulations — could have prevented the plane's plunge into a private home had he lowered the nose of the aircraft. Instead, the 47-year-old pilot — who took private flying lessons to obtain his commercial license — pulled the plane upward.

Sleeping the crew room violation of regulations? You gotta be kidding. And taking private flying lessons to get your commercial? Are there public lessons I can take for much less money?
Get real buddy.
Actually at many companies it is a violation of company policy to sleep overnight in the crew room. Happened all the time at my last 121 carrier... just saying ....strictly speaking it violated company policy.
HercDriver130 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
SWAjet
Regional
23
01-14-2010 07:19 AM
CaptMidnight
Cargo
52
04-26-2009 05:49 PM
cappelation
Hangar Talk
21
03-10-2009 11:40 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices