Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pilot Lifestyle Under Threat >

Pilot Lifestyle Under Threat

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pilot Lifestyle Under Threat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2009, 10:05 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
All I can say is, when you transition to the civilian world, and it's an airline, you'll be surprised about what makes sense and it logical to us, is not the same as how management sees it.



Yep, sounds simple enough, doesn't it? See above, you'll be surprised how things/people behave in this job.
I'm not saying that something won't need to change. Yes - I realize that I am in for a more than likely rude awakening if I tranistion to the civilian world. they may be forced to change. The pilots may be forced to change. Something happened.....something needs to change. We'll just have to wait and see.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 10:13 PM
  #22  
Self Employed.
Thread Starter
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Default FAA mandated rest

Maybe the FAA should force airlines to include a rest day prior to a pilots first flight? It could be paid and included in pilot duty. The company could spring for a hotel. The rest period could start at check in.

Skyhigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 10:15 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh View Post
The media has been attacking the low wages that the FO made in the Colgan crash. They also have been critical of the commuting lifestyle. If the airlines respond by forcing pilots to live at their base the results could be catastrophic for many.

It is hard enough to make it on airline pay. It would be near impossible to make it if you were forced to live in NYC or most other big cities far from home. I doubt that the airlines will react by raising wages.

Look out for big changes in company commuting policies.


Pilots' low pay, long commutes probed in air crash | Top Stories | Seattle News, Local News, Breaking News, Weather | KING5.com

Skyhigh
Yeah, and if they do away with commuting and raise mins like they testified to today, the only way theyll get a pilot is to raise wages..the way I see it, this crash will either force a raise increase or Colgan goes back to business as normal (low wages, low hiring mins) when this blows over..i think the second is most likely.
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 11:04 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 251
Default

First, calling in sick isn't always as easy as it sounds. It might look easy on paper, but the reality on the ground is that calling in sick rarely goes unpunished. One way or another, through either sick occurrences, more scrutiny, or intimidating calls from management (especially when calling in fatigued), a sick/fatigue call gets some sort of underhanded punishment. Not on paper, not by policy, but in reality it does. End of Story.

Second, long commutes happen. Life happens. I now commute trans-con, and that wasn't my original idea, and lucky for me, it's not forever. But guess what? My base got closed, my new base would have absolutely destroyed my QOL, and other life factors got in the way to where now I commute across the country. Not ideal, but that's how the cookies crumbled. Also, sometimes you have to go get a job, and if that means it's across the country, it's across the country. If you're in a relationship with someone else that actually HAS A JOB that PAYS WELL, guess what again, folks? You're not displacing yourself and family for an under 20K job at a hell-hole. Also, I fight for that jumpseat against enough mainline pilots to know that it's not only regional guys schlepping across the country. Sorry, but there's just as many if not more mainline pilots who trans-con the commute.

Last edited by MrBigAir; 05-14-2009 at 03:15 AM. Reason: grammar
MrBigAir is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 12:22 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Convairator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 238
Default

Originally Posted by TheBills View Post
I dont think they could be that strict on commuting pilots, you cant do that. They would lose a lot of pilots. example...70% of air tran pilots commute.
Yes they do! I do like getting paid to fly, however, if I was told I had to live in ATL, I would probably find a new career field. That just wouldnt be my cup of tea.
Convairator is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 01:11 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Default

The US should adopt the JAR Ops duty/rest regulations. Much more civilized than the FARs.

As for forced based living… especially in the north east??? Right. I say to management, go for it! Hopefully the regional guys would stake stock and tell management to go sh!t in their hats as the pay just ain’t worth it! Now who is going to fly the plane?

Maybe… and I say maybe these overpaid morons in management will wake up and make arrangements for hotels for the commuter so they would be well rested before their start of duty.

When flying cargo, I slept in the dark rooms. Better than the reclining chair, as long as you did not have a wall shaking window cracking snorer sharing your room.
captjns is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 01:29 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 781
Default

Originally Posted by captjns View Post

Maybe… and I say maybe these overpaid morons in management will wake up and make arrangements for hotels for the commuter so they would be well rested before their start of duty.
Where does it say anywhere that the company is responsible for where the pilot lives? If you are dumb enough to commute from Seattle to the NY area for a 1300 dollar per month job on 10 days off all the power to you. If people are willing to go that low including taking flights on cargo planes with multiple stops on a redeye why should the company do anything about it? They're going to have a hard time getting sympathy out of anybody with this crash, not to mention it was mostly due to pilot error because he didn't know how to fly an airplane along with the clueless FO.
BURflyer is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 02:06 AM
  #28  
Furlough line holder
 
andy171773's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ2, ATR, CRJ7, E145, 737
Posts: 1,845
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81 View Post
It really would be nice to see that happen, but just like everything in aviation there would be an almost uneven trade off. Like pay. They would have to pay us less and hire more people. Bad for us, good for management. Never the other way around. I think it is one of the laws of physics or something.

Aviation physics #1 law...Sh_t always runs downhill, unless acted upon by an outside force...i.e. a crewmembers' head.
andy171773 is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 02:06 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Default

Originally Posted by BURflyer View Post
Where does it say anywhere that the company is responsible for where the pilot lives?
Did I write that the company is responsible for where a pilot lives? It would be nice if the company made hotel arrangements for commuting crewmembers. I know, it aint gonna happen. Thus the commuting aviator is going to have to make sure they have the self discipline to be well rested before reporting for duty.

I do agree that commuting cross country on a freighter does not cut it. Currently crewmembers know their terms and conditions, and hotels expenses are not covered. They accept without any gripes or move on. Management will not change their views on this issue unless either forced to by job action, or by regulatory authorities.
captjns is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 02:48 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,615
Default

Simple way to solve the wages issue is for companies to pay housing for their personnel just like many overseas carriers do, though I think just the notion would give many bean counters a heart attack.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeepcrawln
Hiring News
7
05-02-2009 04:13 AM
vagabond
Hiring News
4
04-08-2009 08:03 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
flyboyjake
Part 135
40
12-19-2008 12:20 PM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices