Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pilot Lifestyle Under Threat >

Pilot Lifestyle Under Threat


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pilot Lifestyle Under Threat

Old 05-14-2009 | 01:59 PM
  #71  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

How about lets say 2 guys live in DFW and both are FOs on an airbus. What if they were allowed to get together and were allowed to specifically do DFW flights/ When one comes in to DFW on his last leg the other DFW commuter starts his trip. It would take some logistics to work it out but that would cost almost nothing if it could be worked out. In fact it would save the company hotel and per diem costs.

the only problem i see with this is if that specific aircraft is used on that segment or if it gets shifted in and out of that station.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 02:32 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Jet Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
If all airlines did this then that would help tremendously for people trying to get to and from work.
I'm all for any option to make commutes easier for those who do it, but I don't believe in any way, shape, or form that it is the companies responsibility or obligation to do so. The company offers someone the job and the applicant either accepts it or denies it. They assign the domicile and it is the employee's responsibility to ensure that they arrive for duty at said time.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 02:36 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Jet Pilot
Default

Just my speculation, but if the feds were going to implement anything with regards to commuting it would probably be this: they would probably institute a regulation in which your commute time would count towards your duty time AND make it your responsibility to ensure compliance with it.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 02:46 PM
  #74  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

Originally Posted by Lab Rat
I'm all for any option to make commutes easier for those who do it, but I don't believe in any way, shape, or form that it is the companies responsibility or obligation to do so. The company offers someone the job and the applicant either accepts it or denies it. They assign the domicile and it is the employee's responsibility to ensure that they arrive for duty at said time.
Most airlines dont assign you anything, you bid it. What if said airline closes bases on regular bases? What if said airline moves your aircraft out of said base? What if they get rid of that aircraft and you're forced to bid into something else at a different base? This isnt like normal jobs with an office building in a city that wont change. Our jobs are unlike any other job in this country. Closest thing to it would be the military and switching bases and the government pays for the moves. Do you think the airlines are going to pay to move pilots every time something changes? Its cheaper for the companies to just let people commute and attempt to make it as easy as possible to do so.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 02:57 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Jet Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
Most airlines dont assign you anything, you bid it. What if said airline closes bases on regular bases? What if said airline moves your aircraft out of said base? What if they get rid of that aircraft and you're forced to bid into something else at a different base? This isnt like normal jobs with an office building in a city that wont change. Our jobs are unlike any other job in this country. Closest thing to it would be the military and switching bases and the government pays for the moves. Do you think the airlines are going to pay to move pilots every time something changes? Its cheaper for the companies to just let people commute and attempt to make it as easy as possible to do so.
Most airlines dont assign you anything, you bid it.
No kidding. And since you can only hold what your seniority dictates, then that is an assignment.

What if said airline closes bases on regular bases?
Find a new job -most airlines that play "musical domicile" usually don't pay well enough to put up with their b.s. anyway.

What if said airline moves your aircraft out of said base?
Bid another airplane and/or seat - if possible.

What if they get rid of that aircraft and you're forced to bid into something else at a different base?
Part of playing the game.

All of your points are valid and realistic. However, that is part of the job and most of us understand and accept that when we take the job. I'm not anti-commute, I'm just saying the responsibility to make it to work on time rests with the individual - that is true in ALL professions.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 03:08 PM
  #76  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

You portray it as everyone could and should live in base and thats not the case with this job. Once you're established within your company you dont just "Quit" if you have to change bases. This industry is run on seniority and that coincides with your pay.

I commute to MEM for my job with NWA/DAL, I had a choice of bases and aircraft as a new hire and i chose. Now lets say i moved to memphis right away and now that we've merged with Delta they decide to move aircraft out of MEM and put them in slc, should i then quit or uproot my family and move to slc? What if in a year the company decides to move planes from slc to atl and i cant hold a specific aircraft in atl, should i then uproot my family again? Maybe i should quit and start over at another airline? You're portraying this situation in our industry too simplistic. I dont have an office job thats central located in one place throughout my career. And no guys at this point in their careers just dont quit and start over

Commuting is part of this job now and just because you live in base doesnt mean you're going to have more rest anyway. You cant tell if guys whom live in base are getting sufficient sleep at home before they work so whats the difference? I, as a commuter, am often more rested than guys i fly with that live in base. Regulating commuters DOESNT solve anything.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 05:55 PM
  #77  
Spongebob's Avatar
Bored
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Grumman Torture Device (weekends only)
Default

I'd postulate that if the airline was on the hook for relocation expenses beyond your control (closing your base or a Jr assigned seat) that much of the musical base shenanigans would stop pretty quick.

Look at UPS/FedEx....
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 06:18 PM
  #78  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: CRJ-700 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by captjns
Question to the feeder pilots… When you interviewed, did you know where your base was going to be? During basic indoctrination, didn't the instructor point out that the use crew room as a rest area prohibited? Weren’t you all warned about the evils of long distance commutes? Did not the subject of crash pads come up during training? Did you expect by some miracle that your salaries would actually start as some livable wage rather than $1,500 per month? Were you all so naïve to think that you would be treated with respect by your company? Those with young wife and child(ren), did you really think this through and consider their feelings and sacrifices? How many of you in your twenties are lucky enough to have generous parents still willing to supplement your income? With all of this in mind, all of you accepted those substandard conditions. Why?
Who are you? Why do you ask this question? I came here to be a pilot. I resent the implication of your post. I am not a young pilot. I had a first career and a fair amount of time flying. You my friend come across as arrogant and that is a quality we would do quite well to do away with.

Last edited by fboehm; 05-14-2009 at 06:24 PM. Reason: misspelling
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 06:43 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Jet Pilot
Default

You portray it as everyone could and should live in base and thats not the case with this job. Once you're established within your company you dont just "Quit" if you have to change bases. This industry is run on seniority and that coincides with your pay.
I'm all for living wherever you want to live. My comments were more of knowing that the individual is ultimately responsible to get to work. Some, and I'm not including you in this category, have postulated an "I deserve attitude" with regards to the airline somehow "owing" them a ride to work. Believe me, I understand that certain conditions outside of your control do necessitate a commute on your part - and not by choice either.

Once you're established within your company you dont just "Quit" if you have to change bases.
My "musical domicile" comment was geared more towards the entry-level bottom feeders (similar to type I used to fly for ) that moved domiciles so as to not have to pay per diem. Those carriers are the ones that came to mind, not established majors who are doing it due to operational necessity or mergers.

Regulating commuters DOESNT solve anything.
I don't think it would either. I was inferring that it could happen (possible but not probable), but only as a knee-jerk reaction.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 07:00 PM
  #80  
Guildenstern's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Resigned
Default

Originally Posted by sig598
The theory was that you would do this for a year or two until moving on to bigger and better things. Doctors have poorly paid residencies with awful QOL. Everyone pays their dues (hopefully). This "feeder airline" step wasnt supposed to last 15 years.
We have our "Residencies" too, It's called Instructing. Where you live at home or the crappy university student cage (which is better then a Resident who has to move to where they are placed, Med school bills and all.) You and one student and whoever you crash on are all the risk involved at that point. Consequently you get paied crap; but you are home every night.

By the time you belt into a plane with 50 specimines of the mighty unwashed masses, Recidency is over. You are now part of a commercial flight crew. The fact that both the company and the pilots look at themselves as being in a disposable job just makes the whole thing worse.

Pretending that flying for a regional is like being a Resident is Bull. Flying for a regional is closer to working the crappy county hospital as a full fledged doctor of medicine. Not glamorous, not big money, but you are still a professional acting in a professional capacity at the only job you have.

But either way, Pilots comparing themselves to Doctors may be a sign that the Pilot Ego is completely out of control.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeepcrawln
Hiring News
7
05-02-2009 04:13 AM
vagabond
Hiring News
4
04-08-2009 08:03 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
flyboyjake
Part 135
40
12-19-2008 12:20 PM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices