Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
FAA chief urges pilots to read Flight 3407... >

FAA chief urges pilots to read Flight 3407...

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

FAA chief urges pilots to read Flight 3407...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2009, 11:36 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by pete2800 View Post
thanks I found it, and it is definatly crazy....wow
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 08-06-2009, 04:36 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
STILL GROUNDED's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 1,105
Default

The thing I like is when the FED sits in between you and won't shut his pie hole from the time the cockpit door closes until it reopens. I don't care about his fifth wife!
STILL GROUNDED is offline  
Old 08-06-2009, 04:50 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Telecom Company, President
Posts: 421
Default

Originally Posted by TristarJS30 View Post
If there was ever a time for ALPA to do something... this is it.
Please don't hold your breath waiting. They are too busy trying to get tee times at the country club.
IronWalt is offline  
Old 08-06-2009, 05:29 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 239
Default

I don't think that violation of sterile cockpit was the cause of the distraction that led to the loss of control following stick shaker activation. I felt at the time I read the transcript, watched the animation, etc... that there was a failure of proper monitoring of the aircraft flight instruments by the First Officer (PM). Why? A very real possibility was the fatigue/illness that she complained of on more than one occasion during the course of the flight. Why do you think that CJC has been back on it's heels ever since about their sick-call policy. The threat of a job action for calling in sick was real, and a part of the company culture since my first stint here in 04'. According to the emplyee handbook, calling in sick and using your sick time was a "privilege.
Ultimately, we will never know exactly why there was a failure to properly monitor the airplane/flight regime. On the outside it is a failure in basic airmanship, there is no question about that. The real question is why did this failure happen?
Finally, I'd like to add that breakdowns in cockpit decorum/flight discipline and sterile cockpit vilolations are a daily occurance. I've witnessed a major airline Captain having a shouting match with his teenage daughter on his cellphone while sitting on the jumpseat of a 757 taxiing in ORD. So, let's not condemn the "regional" pilot anymore...
BE19Pilot is offline  
Old 08-06-2009, 06:39 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 737
Default

There was a failure of BOTH pilots to monitor the speed.
20sx is offline  
Old 08-06-2009, 07:05 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 239
Default

Agreed, I was simply pointing out that the F/O had complained of being sick/fatigued and absolutely failed in her primary duty...MONITORING the flying pilot. As for the Captain, it is an unknown what he was thinking, scanning, etc...
BE19Pilot is offline  
Old 08-06-2009, 09:11 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: retired
Posts: 992
Default

Originally Posted by STILL GROUNDED View Post
The thing I like is when the FED sits in between you and won't shut his pie hole from the time the cockpit door closes until it reopens. I don't care about his fifth wife!
The Captain should "remind" him of the sterile cockpit rule which should also be covered in the JS brief. If he refuses to comply, exclude him from cockpit. You have that right as PIC, although it had better be a flagrant violation. Pull the c/b on the CVR and enter it in the maintenance log.
Dougdrvr is offline  
Old 08-06-2009, 09:27 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
crazyjaydawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Middle Seat
Posts: 1,202
Default

Originally Posted by TPROP4ever View Post
thanks I found it, and it is definatly crazy....wow
Yea 3701 was just a couple idiots that ruined a perfectly good airframe enroute to 'weeding' themselves out of aviation.
crazyjaydawg is offline  
Old 08-06-2009, 11:05 AM
  #29  
Portuguese Troubleshooter
 
ImEbee's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Burrito Bomber
Posts: 370
Default

Originally Posted by STILL GROUNDED View Post
The thing I like is when the FED sits in between you and won't shut his pie hole from the time the cockpit door closes until it reopens. I don't care about his fifth wife!
Ain't that the truth. Our old POI had to be reminded multiple times every time he rode up front. Same guy who threatened to violate you if your head wasn't on a swivle at FL250 searching for traffic. And then he had the audacity to say our airline had a "sterile cockpit" issue
ImEbee is offline  
Old 08-06-2009, 02:47 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
labbats's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 1,347
Default

So should CFIs not talk below 10,000? I guess it isn't safe! The FAA had better know enough to look elsewhere for problems.
labbats is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SkyHigh
Leaving the Career
41
01-08-2010 07:02 AM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
6
08-07-2009 12:12 PM
XSive
Regional
25
06-18-2009 04:10 PM
forgot to bid
Major
15
11-25-2008 09:21 PM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices