newarkblows |
08-09-2009 11:37 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTOP
(Post 658928)
One point that may have been overlooked: The major airlines are ALREADY legally responsible for the crashes of the regional airlines they hire...
|
The Majors who hire regionals or third party companies are not nearly as accountable as you might think. In the case of 3407 and most contracts the legal responsibility is on the third party contractor. The lawyers havent gotten a chance to fight it but in every press release CAL has distanced themselves from Colgan, Pinnacle, and any regional by saying "we will try and assist their company in dealing with this issue." They have said that they are not liable for what their contractors do. This is the reason that Colgan's insurance will pay for most of the damages and CAL will get off without paying any major losses. They will try and sue CAL, airplane manufacturer, etc... but most cases will be dismissed and end up with the liability resting on Colgan.
If colgans insurance company goes bankrupt... then it will get interesting. Some states have laws that say the client whose case bankrupted the insurance company must "attempt" to make the debtors whole. The legal storm is just getting started in the 3407 case.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTOP
(Post 658928)
It wouldn't make a bit of difference. Reason: The wholly-owned regional subsidiaries ARE corporations, and most only own a single certificate.
|
You missed what he was saying. He wants them to limit the number of certificates flying for a corportation. An example would be if Continental is the corporation. Only one certificate flying Continetal passengers with a gold globe on the tail. No regionals or subcontracting of flying is permissable. Codeshares would be a tricky thing to work out under this idea.
|