Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

U Fly Mic

Old 09-09-2009 | 05:47 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

DEN has a kiosk.
Reply
Old 09-17-2009 | 09:54 AM
  #32  
Vegaspilot's Avatar
Gets Tue/Wed and Sat Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Default

I actually traded in the QC2's for the 15s and while they are quite a bit quieter, they don't seem to seal as well and I get a lot of feedback on take off and taxi. It was enough of a problem that I could hear the ANR trying to compensate just chewing on something. Never had that with the 2s. I'm going to exchange them for a different pair and try that. If it's the same, then I'll trade em back for the QC2s again. On the plus side, Bose's CS is so far excellent.
Reply
Old 09-17-2009 | 04:04 PM
  #33  
TurboFan's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Vegaspilot
I get a lot of feedback on take off and taxi.
I noticed the same thing. Although I personally don't find it a deal-breaker. I think the culprit is the fact that from my research Bose now has noise-cancellation microphones not only inside but outside of the earcups on the CQ15's, whereas the QC2's only had microphones inside the cups. The problem seems most pronounced on the CRJ during takeoff when you have lots of air coming out of the gasper vents. I like to position the vent to blow directly on my face and I think the high velocity of the air as it blows past the external microphone is causing the issue. To be honest with you after only a few trips I got used to it and now I don't even notice it anymore.

I still think overall the 15's have far superior noise-cancellation than the 2's and am quite happy with the setup.
Reply
Old 09-17-2009 | 06:19 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: MD80 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Vegaspilot
I actually traded in the QC2's for the 15s and while they are quite a bit quieter, they don't seem to seal as well and I get a lot of feedback on take off and taxi. It was enough of a problem that I could hear the ANR trying to compensate just chewing on something. Never had that with the 2s. I'm going to exchange them for a different pair and try that. If it's the same, then I'll trade em back for the QC2s again. On the plus side, Bose's CS is so far excellent.

I traded in my 2s for the 15s and haven't had any problems at all. They seem to seal very nicely (better than the 2s with my sunglasses) and are noticeably quieter. Flying an MD80... Not sure if airplane type has anything to do with your issue...
Reply
Old 09-17-2009 | 08:49 PM
  #35  
Vegaspilot's Avatar
Gets Tue/Wed and Sat Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Default

It's the Q400 so it's defiantely got more bumps, thumps and vibrations. I will say that the new ones I exchanged the first QC15s for seem to fit and seal better. Hoping that was the ticket.
Reply
Old 09-17-2009 | 10:03 PM
  #36  
Aviatormar's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
From: CH2T Worst plane ever
Default

I'll check if they at the phl store will do a trade-in and let ya'll know.
Reply
Old 09-18-2009 | 05:45 AM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Blackbird
People I've talked to said that the Zulu's are not as good as the QC, when you take size, price and usefulness into account. I flew with a Fed last week that said the TSO thing is overrated.
Maybe one of the legal types can clarify but my understanding is the headset TSO thing does not really apply to most airliners. Most of the airliners are certified using the cockpit speakers and the handheld mike for communication. The feds require a boom mic (hands free) during critical phases of flight. This is why we can take off our headset en-route but wear them during terminal ops. Seeing that the UFM microphone meets the fed’s requirement the UFM/BOSE system is legal because the cockpit speaker is certified as the primary means (if a fed is onboard turn the speaker on). Now if your aircraft is certified using headsets (i.e. you cannot legally remove your headset en-route) then you are required to have a TSO’d headset (take the ear buds).
Reply
Old 09-18-2009 | 07:10 AM
  #38  
Vegaspilot's Avatar
Gets Tue/Wed and Sat Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Default

I also noticed on the Uflymike website that they say only the QC2 and not the QC15 is currently part of the TSO's combo. I thought it was just the earbud and boom mike that made that up and not the headset part. Kinda odd.
Reply
Old 09-19-2009 | 09:04 AM
  #39  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default Battery Life?

For those of you using the new 15's how does battery life compare to the QC2? Wondering if it is decreased due to the new external mic inputs.

Thanks
Reply
Old 09-19-2009 | 09:59 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Default

so from what I read so far it does not sound like its worth it to trade in my QC2's for Qc15's
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
39
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
Bucking Bar
Hangar Talk
7
04-23-2009 06:21 PM
Lowlevel
Regional
31
04-21-2009 11:28 AM
JDFlyer
Regional
32
03-17-2009 10:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices