![]() |
Originally Posted by Maxcackel
(Post 680863)
Has anybody thought of how the new FAA work rules might affect the way we would write the contract for pbs. And should we wait until the rules come out?
|
Originally Posted by SilkySmooth
(Post 681145)
The new rules, whatever they may be, will be more restrictive, therefore requiring more pilots. There's no sense in bargaining for something (no more furloughs) that we're going to get for free. In fact, when the new rules go into effect, I predict they'll need to bring back the furloughees anyway.
|
Originally Posted by JetPipeOverht
(Post 680884)
We should get what we can get now with this purposed implementation, and then adjusts for the better when we can.
|
So the news from SH in my mailbox is that ASA is going back to flica while eBid is regeared for PBS. Does anyone have any new dirt on how the language is coming along. Most importantly, the furlough protection. We all know PBS is more efficient and saves money mostly by requiring less pilots for a certain amount of flying. Is ALPA making sure there will not be anymore furlough's after PBS is implemented?
|
Originally Posted by Banshee365
(Post 695091)
So the news from SH in my mailbox is that ASA is going back to flica while eBid is regeared for PBS. Does anyone have any new dirt on how the language is coming along. Most importantly, the furlough protection. We all know PBS is more efficient and saves money mostly by requiring less pilots for a certain amount of flying. Is ALPA making sure there will not be anymore furlough's after PBS is implemented?
|
Originally Posted by rjboy
(Post 677147)
Take a good look at the SKYW program. Has been running for about four years now and most people prefer it to hard lines.
That's funny, because I just flew with our number 1 FO and he still can't figure out why he's not getting all his bid choices, and finding out that people junior to him are getting pairings he bid...I'm in the same boat, just not bidding number one, but there is no transparency with our PBS system, and I frequently see junior crewmembers getting pairings I didn't from my first and second layers.:rolleyes: |
Whats funny is ASA isn't getting the PBS vendor, nor work rules that Skywest has. See, our Union negotiated our PBS with management. We didn't get it forced upon us.......
Anyhow, not saying it will be good - or bad. But, the difference in rules, vendors and setup will be wide between ASA and Skywest on this one. Hey, maybe you can threaten to unionize and piggy back off of us, again! |
Originally Posted by Truman_Sparks
(Post 695258)
Whats funny is ASA isn't getting the PBS vendor, nor work rules that Skywest has. See, our Union negotiated our PBS with management. We didn't get it forced upon us.......
Anyhow, not saying it will be good - or bad. But, the difference in rules, vendors and setup will be wide between ASA and Skywest on this one. Hey, maybe you can threaten to unionize and piggy back off of us, again! If that was a response to my post, I'm well aware of the "difference in rules, vendors and setup between ASA and Skyw".... You'll notice my response was to a post from someone here stating how well loved PBS was at Skyw! As for your smug comment about unionizing...I wasn't originally hired by this company, the one I was hired at was bought by SkyWest, and I've voted for a union every time we've had a vote since then!! |
Ok. Cool......Smugness retracted.
|
Originally Posted by selcal
(Post 695158)
Read your union email.
I'm simply looking for someone to provide some answers on this, not waste a post on the thread. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:21 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands