Are wholly owned regionals going away?
#11
look - it's all about frequency. RJ's are sanwiched in between mainline to keep up the frequency or:
provide thin markets at an elevated price. now I ask you, if the market is down in general does this generate more thin markets or less?
the answer - more(yes some get too thin and vanish). Even though RJ's cost 2x more to operate, they keep fares higher by offering fewer seats. the market forces take over and the bidding for those seats determine the viability of that market. if pax are willing to pay then it continues. an old trick/strategy for raising fares has always been to scale down in order to force the bidding to begin. I predict a short time when this adjustment will play out - it is anybodies guess (even Boyd) how it ends up. Look for mainline replacement for awhile followed by the tired refrain that RJ's are taking jobs from the mainline, then in the aftermath a revised network will appear. The only thing that skews this is gov intervention in the form of subsidies. This phenomena historically has taken the form of EAS but now many communities are buying into a local form of the same stripe.
provide thin markets at an elevated price. now I ask you, if the market is down in general does this generate more thin markets or less?
the answer - more(yes some get too thin and vanish). Even though RJ's cost 2x more to operate, they keep fares higher by offering fewer seats. the market forces take over and the bidding for those seats determine the viability of that market. if pax are willing to pay then it continues. an old trick/strategy for raising fares has always been to scale down in order to force the bidding to begin. I predict a short time when this adjustment will play out - it is anybodies guess (even Boyd) how it ends up. Look for mainline replacement for awhile followed by the tired refrain that RJ's are taking jobs from the mainline, then in the aftermath a revised network will appear. The only thing that skews this is gov intervention in the form of subsidies. This phenomena historically has taken the form of EAS but now many communities are buying into a local form of the same stripe.
#12
I don't really have a response for the original post, because it really was more of an uninformed statement than a question. But having said that, I wouldn't be surprised to see the pendulum swing back toward wholly-owned feeders because it gives the mainline more control and better profit margins. The Colgan Effect probably accelerated this.
#13
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,144
Likes: 801
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Not true. A major cannot just break any regional feed contract without good reason. Even if it has good reason, it is still likely to get sued and end paying anyway (ex. DAL). Wholly-owned's provide some profit in good times, but they also serve as "capacity accumulators" during bad times because their capacity can usually be changed on a whim.
#14
Not true. A major cannot just break any regional feed contract without good reason. Even if it has good reason, it is still likely to get sued and end paying anyway (ex. DAL). Wholly-owned's provide some profit in good times, but they also serve as "capacity accumulators" during bad times because their capacity can usually be changed on a whim.
#15
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: ERJ F/O
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
Continental sold off xjt but they have subsequently ruined that market for airlines like American and Delta who both tried to sell off Eagle and Comair and could not find a buyer. Maybe all the buyers actually paid attention to what happened to xjt. Unless the regional has a long term cpa that is flexible, profitable and guaranteed (like a certain % of regional feed) there will never be a sale of a wholly owned. ASA was sold to skywest under that scenario and i am pretty sure that delta would have rather kept it a wholly owned now in hindsight. There is so much pressure to keep costs down and the whipshawing is keeping negative pressure on pilot compensation and profit margins in the industry.
XJT was sold off and went from a high of 1850 flights a day to somewhere around 900 right now. Their original cpa was so restrictive that xjt couldnt bid on any other flying without ruining the profitable flying with CAL. Now we are the cheapest (cost per hour) 50 seat regional in the world and we arent making any money.
In the future i think the larger regionals will prevail. The majors want cheap and are going to force regionals to accept meager profit margins on the flying. The only real way to make money with such tight margins is going to be with economies of scale ( a lot of airplanes) or running a crappy operation. They might only be making a few bucks per flight but when you have 400 airframes all actively flying your expenses generally go down per airframe. I think SKW, Republic, Eagle, ... will survive along with the airlines who treat their employees and skimp on maintenance.
#17

Some airlines may still use outsourcing to cut costs, but others will see the inherent risk in passing the safety of their passengers and the reputation of the airline to the lowest bidder.
Great post, mwa. Government intervention may still happen, but since they are quickly going broke, I don't see them being able to do much unless it is subsidize Greyhound and Amtrak.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: A350
the word going around is that DELTA is upset republic will compete against them. therfore when the contracts expire, they will not be re-newed. which puts compass in a position to pick up their flying and increase their fleet of emb-175....
#19
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,144
Likes: 801
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
How long are their feed contracts good for?
#20
I once thought this, but depending on who you talk to, it couldn't be further from the truth. Remember, RAH has different certs for each carrier. Shuttle America flies E175s for DL, not Republic (Airlines). Therefore, they are not in vilation of the contract. It gets even muddier when you consider, the NWA/DAL/MIDWEST/TPG Holdings scenario. I forget how its all tied together, but in the Major thread if you do some searching, those guys have it all laid out. Somehow, NW/DL were/are in bed with RAH and TPG as far as this deal is concerned.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



