Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pinnacle pilots say NO!! >

Pinnacle pilots say NO!!

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle pilots say NO!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2009, 02:26 PM
  #141  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,524
Default

I'm just glad some of my fellow pilots are trying to find me the pony I have been wanting.
higney85 is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 07:36 AM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PinnacleFO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: CRJ Captain
Posts: 1,406
Default

Well Pinnacle will not be part of the UAL RFP - Just listened to the company confernce call and they said that UAL was there and we did put in a bid but we were not successful.
Take that for what its worth
My prediction is that in 2017 we will be a fleet of 124 crjs and 16 crj 900s
PinnacleFO is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 10:38 AM
  #143  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 787
Default

Yeah--I think them signing the TA was a last-ditch effort to get that UAL flying. They didn't want it bad enough to pay us too much, though.

Funny (and sad) thing about the current state of things--Pinnacle probably saw the Skywest deal, and the many Republic deals for cash-for-flying and probably now realizes they probably have a better chance of getting new flying by lending the money that was going to be the bonus check versus signing a deal with us.

God Forbid Delta or Continental needs cash in the next few years--they'll just lend away our would-be raises and bonuses and get more flying, still with no TA. And please don't respond with "but the NMB will release us by then..."
nicholasblonde is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 10:46 AM
  #144  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,524
Default

Nick- honestly there is alot going on as far as working towards a TA. Make sure to remind everyone you bump into the do the survey. If you have questions feel free to call or email me.
higney85 is offline  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:50 AM
  #145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PinnacleFO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: CRJ Captain
Posts: 1,406
Default

The online survey closes today and so far the participation has been pathetic. If you voted no and did not fill out this survey, then your no vote has lost a lot of its purpose. Its one thing to bang your chest and say you voted no, but its another to not want to do anything and let someone else take care of it for you. Seriously guys and girls, the survey takes 10 minutes to do and it will help out our negotiators going forward because they negotiate on what YOU say. Get off your butts and take the survey! If we don't get at least 58% participation on the survey, which is what the ta didnt pass by, then the survey is a failure.
PinnacleFO is offline  
Old 11-05-2009, 08:27 AM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Originally Posted by PinnacleFO View Post
The online survey closes today and so far the participation has been pathetic. If you voted no and did not fill out this survey, then your no vote has lost a lot of its purpose. Its one thing to bang your chest and say you voted no, but its another to not want to do anything and let someone else take care of it for you. Seriously guys and girls, the survey takes 10 minutes to do and it will help out our negotiators going forward because they negotiate on what YOU say. Get off your butts and take the survey! If we don't get at least 58% participation on the survey, which is what the ta didnt pass by, then the survey is a failure.

I'm sorry but all my friends are flying today so I'm not really sure what I'm supposed to put on the survey because nobody has told me what to put on the survey.
mooney is offline  
Old 11-05-2009, 10:02 AM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 787
Default

I filled it out 4 hours after it came out--if they would have done an updated poll like this annually over the last 4 years we prob would have just finished our first month on a new agreement (i.e. if the NC had an updated picture of what 100% of us wanted in the current environment and pilot group, we would've had more than a 42% yes vote).

Higney--my only two things to say are this:

1) If it doesn't cost too much can you guys re-run this survey annually the first week of November so we have an updated picture for the NC? If it goes 2+ years til the next TA, and we don't get released somewhere in there, we need an updated picture or history will repeat itself (4 years will go by and things will have changed so much anything TA'ed will be sub-par).

2) I think JH made a great point on the union board--from day 1 the NC needs to stand firm on making it ammendable the day it would have been ammendable had we signed the most recent TA--setting a date like that forces the company onto our timeframe and gives THEM an incentive to want to get it done and not drag their heels....because every day that goes by is one less day of labor stability they could've used to bid on future RFPs...they would only be hurting themselves by dragging their feet if that was made clear from DAY ONE....
nicholasblonde is offline  
Old 11-05-2009, 10:31 AM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SrfNFly227's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: PIC Challenger 605
Posts: 454
Default

Originally Posted by nicholasblonde View Post
2) I think JH made a great point on the union board--from day 1 the NC needs to stand firm on making it ammendable the day it would have been ammendable had we signed the most recent TA--setting a date like that forces the company onto our timeframe and gives THEM an incentive to want to get it done and not drag their heels....because every day that goes by is one less day of labor stability they could've used to bid on future RFPs...they would only be hurting themselves by dragging their feet if that was made clear from DAY ONE....
I wouldn't usually point out anything about who said what, but I want credit for this one since I still think it is a great idea. Wasn't JH, look again
SrfNFly227 is offline  
Old 11-05-2009, 11:04 AM
  #149  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,524
Default

Nick- items noted. Keep in mind the amendable date question IS in the survey so that should pop up when I get to look at the data.
higney85 is offline  
Old 11-05-2009, 11:11 AM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Airbus 319/320 Captain
Posts: 880
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16 View Post
CONGRATS!!!!!!!

You've sent a message to this industry and I hope the rest of us lesson. The buck stops here! No more industry average, we want respect!
Great job! You guys/gals rock!!!
brianb is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
skippy
GoJet
14
05-14-2009 11:12 AM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM
Airsupport
Regional
62
08-10-2008 08:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices