Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Whats next for LYNX?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2009 | 07:21 AM
  #21  
Vegaspilot's Avatar
Gets Tue/Wed and Sat Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Default

Not to mention if I was UAL (or any other codeshare) I'd be done giving RAH any more flying. I think UAL would be nuts to give RAH more money which they can use to compete directly with them with Airbuses.

Last edited by Vegaspilot; 11-10-2009 at 08:23 AM.
Reply
Old 11-10-2009 | 07:30 AM
  #22  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboyrw
He already has planes out of den with ual painted on them.
So BB will pull the Q's away from F9? As long as they don't continue to operate for F9 BB could get away with it......could. See C on page 2.

I don’t have a clue what the “Rev” has cooking but I wouldn’t put anything past him. He just has to figure a way around the SKW clause.

Time will tell. Good luck to all those at Lynx. I truly mean that.
Reply
Old 11-10-2009 | 07:52 AM
  #23  
Flyboyrw's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Lawn Chair
Default

Exactly, he is sneaky. Won't know what is up until it happens.
Reply
Old 11-10-2009 | 08:22 AM
  #24  
Diver Driver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Tiki bar
Default

BB has SJS.
Reply
Old 11-10-2009 | 01:18 PM
  #25  
flyandive's Avatar
Airport Hobo
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Diver Driver
BB has SJS.
LOL, for our sakes he needs SPS, Shiny Prop Syndrome.

The Q is a great airplane for Denver, only turboprop I know of that can carry a full payload (People and Bags) out of high elevation airports with lots of fuel. Great alternative to an RJ, more capable than a Brasilia and an old Dash. Don't know if it would have a high enough profit margin to compete with an old dash though, Doesn't have the crazy weight restrictions a Brasilia has at high elevation, so it might be enough to justify replacing a Brasilia with a Q400. The only thing a Brasilia has over an old Dash is speed.
Reply
Old 11-10-2009 | 01:31 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Killer51883
isnt the scope clause based off of GTOW and not seats? If its solely seats then eagle has been breaking the scope clause for years with the 68 seat ATR.
Eagle ATR's are configured 66 and 64 seats.
Reply
Old 11-10-2009 | 03:06 PM
  #27  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by flyandive
LOL, for our sakes he needs SPS, Shiny Prop Syndrome.

The Q is a great airplane for Denver, only turboprop I know of that can carry a full payload (People and Bags) out of high elevation airports with lots of fuel. Great alternative to an RJ, more capable than a Brasilia and an old Dash. Don't know if it would have a high enough profit margin to compete with an old dash though, Doesn't have the crazy weight restrictions a Brasilia has at high elevation, so it might be enough to justify replacing a Brasilia with a Q400. The only thing a Brasilia has over an old Dash is speed.
The Q400 is NOT a replacement for the E120, S340 and Q2 (ask Horizon) but it is a great replacement for the CR2. Bottom line, the MAJORITY of the markets the E120, S340 and the Q2 serve are not large enough to sustain a Q4 unless you seriously reduce frequency. Now a combination of Q2 types (off peak) and Q4 types (peak) might work on some markets. Customers love options more than they care about the aircraft. Just like they care more about the price of a ticket than the aircraft that carry’s them to their destination. Yes they’ll b1tch and moan about the size and type but they’ll complain a lot more about the price. At least until they start driving and at that point it will no longer matter what aircraft we operate.

We need someone to produce another Next Gen 30-40 seat turboprop. If they did I'd guarantee they'd sell more than enough to turn a rather handsome profit. I'd also wager that SKW would purchase 40-50+ of the airframes and would probably be the launch customer in NA.

PS. I too believe the Q400 has a long profitable future ahead of it but it's not right for every TP market.

Last edited by JetJock16; 11-10-2009 at 03:28 PM.
Reply
Old 11-10-2009 | 09:29 PM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

They can't go to the CHQ certificate due to the faa wanting to redo the proving runs as CHQ doesn't have TP's. Also the manual and training would have to be redone as well. The truth is that BB was going to move them over, but the FAA said wait a sec and came back with this. Thus is why he is calling it an orphan fleet. I got this info from a Lynx guy familiar with the situation. The Lynx certificate csots money and BB doesn't want to pay to keep it.
Reply
Old 11-10-2009 | 09:30 PM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

can be a replacemnet. 22 to break even on the 200, 29 to break even on the 400. QX numbers on that from when I was there. 400 can go everywhere the 200 can.
Reply
Old 11-11-2009 | 04:26 AM
  #30  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by qxlooper
can be a replacemnet. 22 to break even on the 200, 29 to break even on the 400. QX numbers on that from when I was there. 400 can go everywhere the 200 can.
Capacity isn't the determining factor when you consider an aircrafts BEP. It's all about the yield. You can put 1 person on the airplane if they're willing to pay for it.

We fly SBA - SJC - SBA and with the yield we pull the E120 BPE is 5 passengers each way. On average our BPE using our average customer yield is around 12 passengers. Based upon Bombardier’s Q400 fuel cost per seat per hour theQ400 burns almost as must in fuel alone as the E120’s total cost per seat per hour (E120 = $36 per seat per hour).

The Q400 is not a replacement for an E120 type a/c. Yes the E120 may be weight restricted in DEN to 20 passengers but it’s still turning a very handsome profit. Otherwise why did SKW cancel all the E120 retirements and slowly start placing them back in DEN (as well as several others) on at-risk routes?

Q400.COM - Turbo Profits

The Q400 is a great airplane but again it’s not a replacement for an E120 type a/c. If it was then QX would still be flying small markets like OTH, LMT and MWH with the Q4. Now SKW is operating them at-risk with the E120 and doing very well. As a matter of fact OTH has proven to be a very solid money maker for us.

note: Numbers based upon $60 oil.

Last edited by JetJock16; 11-11-2009 at 04:46 AM.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices