Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

AWAC Hiring Spring 2010

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2009, 11:02 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,890
Default CRJ reverse

I always thought this was kind of weird regarding CRJ thrust reverse:

While riding as a pax, I'd always notice that reverse would never occur until the aircraft was almost as slow as 80 kts or even slower. It just seemed like a long time between main gear touchdown and hearing the engines going into reverse, at which point we're practically stopped. The reverse would last maybe 3 seconds. It almost seemed a waste, since I could feel the aircraft slowing before reverse was even activated. What gives? Just curious because on most jets I've flown, specifically the 75/76, I get reverse thrust going before the nosewheel even touches down. Greatly reduces stopping distance. Can this be done on the CRJ? Thanks for your replies.

73
aa73 is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 11:09 AM
  #32  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

I always thought it was weird that you have to arm the reversers on the CRJ's. On the ERJ you have them when you touch down, same on the DC9 although the DC9 is slightly older technology!
johnso29 is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 11:13 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,890
Default

Johnso, do you guys over at NWA (oops I mean DL lol) have that limitation where you can't crack the buckets until the nosewheel is down? That was a biggie on the Mad Dog here at AA b/c you could drag the clamshells on the runway if the nose was too high. Same case on the -9?

73
aa73 is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 11:21 AM
  #34  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by aa73 View Post
Johnso, do you guys over at NWA (oops I mean DL lol) have that limitation where you can't crack the buckets until the nosewheel is down? That was a biggie on the Mad Dog here at AA b/c you could drag the clamshells on the runway if the nose was too high. Same case on the -9?

73
We do not, but a limitation was just recently changed and I think it is to line up with the DAL Mad Dog procedures.

If the runway is NOT contaminated we can deploy them before the nosewheel touches down, but have to wait for the nosewheel to touch in order to spool them.

If the runway IS contaminated we must wait until the nosewheel is down before we can deploy them.

My guess is it has to do with how the clamshells can hinder the aerodynamic effectiveness of the rudder. I don't know if DAL has the same limitation as AA on their Mad Dogs, as they are much longer then even a DC-9-50.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 11:25 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Kenny's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Professional Expat
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by BSOuthisplace View Post
30ish new hires seems like a lot just to cover attrition and increased summer flying, especially with people on furlough. Could some of this be in anticipation of MESA liquidating in March, or the new FAA duty regs?
Nope,

We've been about 10-20 CA's short for about 2 years now.

The new FAA duty regs won't come into effect until after the NPRM process and that will be at least 6-12 months from now, according to the 3 Feds I've taken to PIT from DCA this week.

30 isn't really a lot because we've been beating the cr@p out of the RSV's for at least the last 18 months.

I doubt this anything to do with MESA.
Kenny is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 01:18 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
wags3539's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Slinger
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
Couldn't it be different for Air Wisconsin?

I know on some aircraft it's 60 knots to prevent ingesting FOD.
I don't have the book in front of me, but from memory I believe it's begin stowing them at the 80 knots call, and have them stowed by 60 for AWAC. If that's not exactly it, it's something similar and I usually stow them by 80 anyway.
wags3539 is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 01:23 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atlmsl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL
Posts: 413
Default

Originally Posted by aa73 View Post
I always thought this was kind of weird regarding CRJ thrust reverse:

While riding as a pax, I'd always notice that reverse would never occur until the aircraft was almost as slow as 80 kts or even slower. It just seemed like a long time between main gear touchdown and hearing the engines going into reverse, at which point we're practically stopped. The reverse would last maybe 3 seconds. It almost seemed a waste, since I could feel the aircraft slowing before reverse was even activated. What gives? Just curious because on most jets I've flown, specifically the 75/76, I get reverse thrust going before the nosewheel even touches down. Greatly reduces stopping distance. Can this be done on the CRJ? Thanks for your replies.

73
Yeah that's a CRJ200 issue. The reversers use bleed air instead of hydraulics so once we pull the levers it takes a few seconds for the air to deploy the reverser. It's a pain and renders them all but useless since like you said they can only be used for a few seconds. Bombardier fixed the 700/900 and made their reversers hydraulic.
atlmsl is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 02:13 PM
  #38  
Line Holder
 
ground stop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: "clear right"
Posts: 69
Default

air wisconsin policy on the crj200 is no reverser use until the nose wheel is down. something about differential thrust and heading into the grass.
ground stop is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 02:47 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,610
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
I always thought it was weird that you have to arm the reversers on the CRJ's. On the ERJ you have them when you touch down, same on the DC9 although the DC9 is slightly older technology!
On the crj, we still have them available with weight on wheels at touchdown. They just need to be armed prior in order for them to be activated. In flight, they are disarmed or "off" I guess to avoid an uncommanded deployment. However, they are not armed to auto-deploy like spoilers.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 11-19-2009, 02:53 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,610
Default

Originally Posted by wags3539 View Post
I don't have the book in front of me, but from memory I believe it's begin stowing them at the 80 knots call, and have them stowed by 60 for AWAC. If that's not exactly it, it's something similar and I usually stow them by 80 anyway.
At Mesaba, its pretty much the same thing...idle reverse by 80kts and stowed by 60. I don't think this is a fod issue as it would be pretty difficult to ingest anything on the ground into an engine thats at least 10 feet off the ground.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MaydayMark
Cargo
42
08-07-2009 06:58 AM
FlywithStyle
Regional
40
06-28-2009 12:20 PM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
0
03-15-2005 01:38 PM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
0
03-08-2005 04:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices