![]() |
Originally Posted by jdalbrec
(Post 752670)
because i'm nowhere near that
A few years ago we had quite a few folks come over from a couple of other carriers. Some of them were high-time captains and had thousands of hours in the same type of airplane. Some of them flunked out. Others had attitude problems. Still others weren't happy after a few months. They're not looking for pilots with tens of thousands of hours. They're looking for professionals who will fit in with the corporate culture, who won't have bad attitudes, who will try hard in training, who will be competent (not perfect), who they can expect to keep for while, etc. They're not looking for Chuck Yeager or Neil Armstrong or former 747 captains. Keep trying. Persistence can pay off. AWAC has good points and bad points. One of the good points is that we have a good, solid pilot group of professionals (mostly) who try to get along and do the right thing. If you think you can fit in with that keep trying. If someone thinks they are going to reinvent aviation they probably won't succeed. Anyway.... Just because you are 'low' time doesn't mean everything. They are selective in hiring and training, but high time is not the only metric. Just sayin'... |
I was told they got 1100+ applications over 3 days, and they are hiring maybe 10-12 pilots, with the possibility of 30. That's about 1%. They already held interviews last week, but I'm not sure of the exact number of applicants with the majority being furloughed pilots (Mesaba, Comair, Mesa, etc.)
As far as the min. requirements: 1500TT/500ME & Turbine Experience. Airline experience preferred. |
Eagle is going to hire and they have a post 2015 plan.
|
Originally Posted by saab2000
(Post 752706)
It doesn't matter. Low time is not an absolute indicator of success in the training process.
A few years ago we had quite a few folks come over from a couple of other carriers. Some of them were high-time captains and had thousands of hours in the same type of airplane. Some of them flunked out. Others had attitude problems. Still others weren't happy after a few months. They're not looking for pilots with tens of thousands of hours. They're looking for professionals who will fit in with the corporate culture, who won't have bad attitudes, who will try hard in training, who will be competent (not perfect), who they can expect to keep for while, etc. They're not looking for Chuck Yeager or Neil Armstrong or former 747 captains. Keep trying. Persistence can pay off. AWAC has good points and bad points. One of the good points is that we have a good, solid pilot group of professionals (mostly) who try to get along and do the right thing. If you think you can fit in with that keep trying. If someone thinks they are going to reinvent aviation they probably won't succeed. Anyway.... Just because you are 'low' time doesn't mean everything. They are selective in hiring and training, but high time is not the only metric. Just sayin'... |
i have 1400TT 1200 multi turbine 135....and under review since 12/5..idk if its because they are really "reviewing" my app, or they probably haven't got to it yet.
|
I just checked to see my status and it says Being Reviewed. I can't remember it it has always said that or if it used to be Under Review and if there's even a difference.
|
Originally Posted by saab2000
It doesn't matter. Low time is not an absolute indicator of success in the training process. A few years ago we had quite a few folks come over from a couple of other carriers. Some of them were high-time captains and had thousands of hours in the same type of airplane. Some of them flunked out. Others had attitude problems. Still others weren't happy after a few months. They're not looking for pilots with tens of thousands of hours. They're looking for professionals who will fit in with the corporate culture, who won't have bad attitudes, who will try hard in training, who will be competent (not perfect), who they can expect to keep for while, etc. They're not looking for Chuck Yeager or Neil Armstrong or former 747 captains. Keep trying. Persistence can pay off. AWAC has good points and bad points. One of the good points is that we have a good, solid pilot group of professionals (mostly) who try to get along and do the right thing. If you think you can fit in with that keep trying. If someone thinks they are going to reinvent aviation they probably won't succeed. Anyway.... Just because you are 'low' time doesn't mean everything. They are selective in hiring and training, but high time is not the only metric. Just sayin'... This is just a fancy way of them saying, "if the HR people like you, you are hired. If they don't, you are not." ....just sayin' |
Originally Posted by horusfalcon
(Post 753574)
Originally Posted by saab2000
It doesn't matter. Low time is not an absolute indicator of success in the training process. A few years ago we had quite a few folks come over from a couple of other carriers. Some of them were high-time captains and had thousands of hours in the same type of airplane. Some of them flunked out. Others had attitude problems. Still others weren't happy after a few months. They're not looking for pilots with tens of thousands of hours. They're looking for professionals who will fit in with the corporate culture, who won't have bad attitudes, who will try hard in training, who will be competent (not perfect), who they can expect to keep for while, etc. They're not looking for Chuck Yeager or Neil Armstrong or former 747 captains. Keep trying. Persistence can pay off. AWAC has good points and bad points. One of the good points is that we have a good, solid pilot group of professionals (mostly) who try to get along and do the right thing. If you think you can fit in with that keep trying. If someone thinks they are going to reinvent aviation they probably won't succeed. Anyway.... Just because you are 'low' time doesn't mean everything. They are selective in hiring and training, but high time is not the only metric. Just sayin'... This is just a fancy way of them saying, "if the HR people like you, you are hired. If they don't, you are not." ....just sayin' I guess I'll still be looking for a job! Good luck guys!!! |
I exceed the mins. and have a couple of internal recommendations, but I can't get a call. I never understood how Airline HR picks their candidates, never will, but that's just the way it is. They are interviewing more candidates next week, not sure of the number though. My contact told me that from last weeks interviews, 10 candidates will get an offer. Anyone interviewing soon will most likely be placed in a hiring pool. Also, apparently they are working on a preferential hiring agreement with Piedmont & PSA.
|
Originally Posted by Spoilers
(Post 753637)
I exceed the mins. and have a couple of internal recommendations, but I can't get a call. I never understood how Airline HR picks their candidates, never will, but that's just the way it is. They are interviewing more candidates next week, not sure of the number though. My contact told me that from last weeks interviews, 10 candidates will get an offer. Anyone interviewing soon will most likely be placed in a hiring pool. Also, apparently they are working on a preferential hiring agreement with Piedmont & PSA.
No such "preferential hiring" exists with PSA or Piedmont. Nor is it in the works. Just thought I'd clear a few things up. |
Originally Posted by smackahoCEO
(Post 753722)
No such "preferential hiring" exists with PSA or Piedmont. Nor is it in the works.
|
Originally Posted by Kenny
(Post 753788)
Which is a shame because we really should be offering them a chance, before anyone else.
|
Originally Posted by Kenny
(Post 753788)
Which is a shame because we really should be offering them a chance, before anyone else.
I agree. There are a LOT of pilots out there who are furloughed and deserve a chance. So even if we hire a Mesa furlough--that is equally as good. |
Originally Posted by smackahoCEO
(Post 753833)
So even if we hire a Mesa furlough--that is equally as good.
|
Originally Posted by smackahoCEO
(Post 753722)
Your contact is just about 100% wrong.
Yes, it does suck when another regional carrier flying for the same mainline carrier is hiring and another furloughing. I'm furloughed Comair, and I do think it is BS when we were furloughing 300+ pilots and Mesaba and Compass were hiring. |
Originally Posted by Kenny
(Post 753843)
This is not going to be popular but they should be the last we offer jobs to. PDT, PSA and Comair, should be at the top of the list.
This is a dog eat dog industry. I personally think that a freight dog ought to be offered the position before any previous 121 guys....as they would be fresh, easy to mold to our policies and proceedures, and happy to be here. |
Originally Posted by horusfalcon
(Post 753574)
This is just a fancy way of them saying, "if the HR people like you, you are hired. If they don't, you are not."
....just sayin' They're looking for people who'll fit in in the company culture and who will have success in training and on the line. |
Originally Posted by saab2000
(Post 754079)
That's not entirely true. It is true they have to like you or see some reason for success in training, but it's not true that just because they like you you'll do well in training.
They're looking for people who'll fit in in the company culture and who will have success in training and on the line. You can glean all that, just from reading a resume? Genuine supermen (and women) that is for sure. They truly are the best of the best then!! Surely, I cower, crawl away, hunch and hide in the myriad dark shadows for being unworthy...... Really:rolleyes: I, myself, am of the disposition that a thorough HR department would require more than that, perhaps bring you in for the interview process. Unless, they are just sooo good at portending your ability to be a successful pilot by just reading your resume. Please, please, do not start a flamer by getting off on the wrong foot here, but, I myself feel that I am better off not to be around such genius, if indeed they can tell your future probability of sucess with the company just by reading your rez.. |
If you don't want to work at Air Wisconsin, don't apply.
All I'm saying is that time alone and resumé numbers alone don't guarantee success, at Air Wisconsin or anywhere else. Not sure where you get off on your tangent. History has shown that not all high timers breeze through training and not all low timers are useless deadweight. That's all. Fact is that if they have 25 spots and 1000+ applicants it's going to be hard to decide who to pick. Probably hundreds of very, very qualified folks. And I can say with some certainty that it won't be the 25 who simply have the highest time. Again, if you don't want to work at Air Wisconsin, don't. |
TANGENT?
You reject people, or, you invite people info an interview, based on what you glean from their resumes. LISTEN UP !!! all we want is a fair an honest chance to apply for work!! What's a tangent? [need FIBER in your diet? surely, if you eat cinnabuns at the airport..] I would be honored for an opportunity to interview!! Airframe license, ( I am doing the finishing up on this now, I should have it by the beginning of MAY 2010,) ATP single & multi, 3000 plus hours 121 experience, CFI, II, AGI, MEI, B.S & MBA Aeronautics, Masters pending in Airport Management Power plant License pending 2010, (possible FCC REPAIR TECHNICIAN, w radar stamp) ETC.... (not to mention, I am a real easy dude to get along with)....BEATLE JUICE ..... BTW,,,, No Tickets on my Driver License...... for over 20 years, oh yeah, I am not annoyed by the likes of Mitt Romney, nor Mike Huckabee. |
Originally Posted by Spoilers
(Post 753850)
Yes, it does suck when another regional carrier flying for the same mainline carrier is hiring and another furloughing. I'm furloughed Comair, and I do think it is BS when we were furloughing 300+ pilots and Mesaba and Compass were hiring.
|
negative comment.... not worth it...disregard....
|
Originally Posted by jayray
(Post 754218)
It is complete and total bull turd. The Union should not allow it. These pilots are going back to first year pay flying the same routes with the same name painted on the airplane. Just one more way to keep labor costs down. Isn't this why we are unionized? I thought the election of the new Union friendly administration was going to make it all better.
|
Originally Posted by smackahoCEO
(Post 754226)
Again, I agree. Doesn't look like Prez. Prater's "Take it back" campaign is going too well. If anything what we all see is "Give it away!" Sucks.
Rant over, take my soapbox please and return to the topic. |
Hey everyone, thought I'd pass on my experience with AW. I'm furloughed NetJets and ex-Chautauqua, 4800tt 3500me. Had my resume walked in by a friend. Got called a couple weeks later for an interview, which was last week in ATW. Nice people overall, easy and short interview, about 15 minutes. During the interview they asked me if I'd resign my seniority at NetJets if offered the postion. I politely told them no and explained why in this volatile industry I am hesitant to give up future opportunities, etc. I got a rejection email today, so that must have been an issue for them. Oh well. I can't justify giving up recall rights at a job that pays 3-4x more per year to go work at a company who may or may not have a future past a few more years. Not to mention, in the company overview presentation, the phrase "we probably won't furlough again this fall" was used twice. How encouraging. Good luck to everyone else seeking a job there. They seem like nice people.
|
Some of you sound like American Idol rejects.
|
So guess I'm the guy singing "pants on the ground". just like me, they didn't know what to do with him either!.
|
Originally Posted by n7715x
(Post 754297)
Hey everyone, thought I'd pass on my experience with AW. I'm furloughed NetJets and ex-Chautauqua, 4800tt 3500me. Had my resume walked in by a friend. Got called a couple weeks later for an interview, which was last week in ATW. Nice people overall, easy and short interview, about 15 minutes. During the interview they asked me if I'd resign my seniority at NetJets if offered the postion. I politely told them no and explained why in this volatile industry I am hesitant to give up future opportunities, etc. I got a rejection email today, so that must have been an issue for them. Oh well. I can't justify giving up recall rights at a job that pays 3-4x more per year to go work at a company who may or may not have a future past a few more years. Not to mention, in the company overview presentation, the phrase "we probably won't furlough again this fall" was used twice. How encouraging. Good luck to everyone else seeking a job there. They seem like nice people.
|
Originally Posted by n7715x
(Post 754297)
Not to mention, in the company overview presentation, the phrase "we probably won't furlough again this fall" was used twice. How encouraging. Good luck to everyone else seeking a job there. They seem like nice people.
Originally Posted by el jefe
(Post 754334)
Some of you sound like American Idol rejects.
|
Does anyone know if the second round of interviews are for just today, or does it include wednesday also?.
|
interview
PM me if you need interview information/gouge.
|
Southwest Management Should Read This
Originally Posted by saab2000
(Post 750457)
That's not what I heard. I heard we're 're-negotiating' our contract to fly EMB-190/195s for 'competitive' rates and will be getting contracts with Delta, American, United, AirTran and there are rumors about a Southwest feed. New F/Os will start at $15/hour but that low wage doesn't matter because upgrade will be quick, like 6 months. Oh, and mins have been lowered to 'student' and they'll take care of the rest in the sim. Lookin' great!
I don't know where you get all your doom and gloom. :D IF however, you value a little more than spending 100K to get your ratings, only to make $15/hr for 2+ years – then you might want to look elsewhere. But if that sounds good to you then you’re just the person we’ve been looking for. Hop aboard and join the ranks of intelligent people like Whisky. You too may someday make manager or even Chief Pilot…. And if your with Southwest or have any pull with any of their operations decisions – Welcome to the start of your decline! I mean this with the utmost respect to my fellow pilots that have grown sick and tired of the norm here at AWAC. It is management and the people that work in management that are bringing this company down. Allow them to join your ranks at your own risk! |
I'm not sure if this was mentioned earlier since I didn't read through all of this, but I just heard that they had received over 1,100 applications for the 15 or so spots they are planning to fill. Although things may not be great here all the time, it puts things into perspective. It's nice to have a job in this economy, and I wish the best of luck to everyone who applied. I hope to see some of you on board at whiskey in the near future.
|
https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/
for those of you conspiracy theorists who doubt the CP has a type in our aircraft, check out the above link. Of course the FAA could be lying. |
or following duckcalls....er I mean swansongs thoughts I could also direct you all to cheaters.com or singlebutmarried.com too. Just a idea.
|
Originally Posted by n7715x
(Post 754297)
Hey everyone, thought I'd pass on my experience with AW. I'm furloughed NetJets and ex-Chautauqua, 4800tt 3500me. Had my resume walked in by a friend. Got called a couple weeks later for an interview, which was last week in ATW. Nice people overall, easy and short interview, about 15 minutes. During the interview they asked me if I'd resign my seniority at NetJets if offered the postion. I politely told them no and explained why in this volatile industry I am hesitant to give up future opportunities, etc. I got a rejection email today, so that must have been an issue for them. Oh well. I can't justify giving up recall rights at a job that pays 3-4x more per year to go work at a company who may or may not have a future past a few more years. Not to mention, in the company overview presentation, the phrase "we probably won't furlough again this fall" was used twice. How encouraging. Good luck to everyone else seeking a job there. They seem like nice people.
Good for you on being honest on the seniority issue. There is no way I would give up my NetJets number to come to Air Wisconsin. This place is a deadend you made the right choice. |
Originally Posted by whiskey72
(Post 758885)
https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/
for those of you conspiracy theorists who doubt the CP has a type in our aircraft, check out the above link. Of course the FAA could be lying. But hey, I say let the conspiracy continue - it detracts from his other incapacities |
Actually just put YOUR OWN information. After that you can pretty much search anyone by just putting in a last name. Or just admire your own certificate and medical records.
|
My application status said "submitted" for about a month, and then for the last few months has been "being reviewed". A couple friends received Thanks but no Thanks emails over a month ago. I have yet to hear either way. Any good thoughts about this or should I just accept that I'm lost in the mix? ;)
|
Originally Posted by SWANSONG
(Post 765547)
Of course you could provide us all with his address since this site requires it...
But hey, I say let the conspiracy continue - it detracts from his other incapacities removed...not worth the headache |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:23 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands