Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Flight return to STL due to screening issue >

Flight return to STL due to screening issue

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Flight return to STL due to screening issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2010 | 01:04 PM
  #1  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default Flight return to STL due to screening issue

ST. LOUIS – A company official says a United Airlines Express flight headed to Chicago had to return to St. Louis because of computer trouble in screening passengers.

Spokesman Fred Oxley said GoJet Airlines, the regional carrier operating the flight, had a problem with its computers Friday morning, and manually checked in passengers.

Oxley is a spokesman for Trans State Holdings, which owns GoJet. He says the computers started working after the flight took off from Lambert-St. Louis International Airport. That's when the carrier learned the name of one of the passengers matched one on the Transportation Security Administration's restricted passenger list.

Oxley says the flight returned around 8 a.m. and GoJet determined the passenger was not the same person on the list. The plane took off again around 9:30 a.m. and landed in Chicago.
Reply
Old 01-01-2010 | 01:21 PM
  #2  
Phuz's Avatar
Kerbal Rocket Surgeon
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
From: DTW 717A
Default

Pretty sad how things like this can just happen. its up to an airline employee making near min. wage to 'catch' when someone is on a list. How hard do you think it would be to bribe them? the agents pencil whip the pax count at my airline all the time, mostly because the agents just don't care about things like security. you get what you pay for.
Reply
Old 01-01-2010 | 02:29 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: MD80
Default

Originally Posted by Phuz
Pretty sad how things like this can just happen. its up to an airline employee making near min. wage to 'catch' when someone is on a list. How hard do you think it would be to bribe them? the agents pencil whip the pax count at my airline all the time, mostly because the agents just don't care about things like security. you get what you pay for.
LOL yea they catch it when the person is already gone and in the air, and THEN order the plane back when for the time required to get back could have already gone to ORD. All to make sure Mohamed was not on. What joke of a bureaucracy, it's a byproduct of when people stop caring about their job.
Reply
Old 01-01-2010 | 04:32 PM
  #4  
TBucket's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Default

With Gojets, it was probably one of the pilots...
Reply
Old 01-01-2010 | 04:35 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TBucket
With Gojets, it was probably one of the pilots...

lmfao.
Reply
Old 01-02-2010 | 02:26 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Angry

Bashing GoJet pilots.. Did you know most of the pilots there are now furloguhed TWA,UNITED,ATA,MEDX it is not the same pilot groupe that started it. And let me tell you this we all want to leave but with this economy we are screwed...
Reply
Old 01-02-2010 | 02:39 PM
  #7  
JetPipeOverht's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Stagnant..
Default

Who Then Please, using your same rationale, would be in the left seat ?
Reply
Old 01-02-2010 | 02:40 PM
  #8  
flyguyniner11's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by AirWillie
LOL yea they catch it when the person is already gone and in the air, and THEN order the plane back when for the time required to get back could have already gone to ORD. All to make sure Mohamed was not on. What joke of a bureaucracy, it's a byproduct of when people stop caring about their job.
are you guys missing this...they said it was a computer problem that was the cause of this..not people not caring or whatever you wanted to blame it on
Reply
Old 01-02-2010 | 03:42 PM
  #9  
Phuz's Avatar
Kerbal Rocket Surgeon
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
From: DTW 717A
Default

Originally Posted by flyguyniner11
are you guys missing this...they said it was a computer problem that was the cause of this..not people not caring or whatever you wanted to blame it on
nope but perhaps you are. How does it make any sense that intelligence lists fall to AIRLINE employees when we pay TSA to simply check that your I.D. matches your boarding pass? shouldn't it be the other way around?? This computer glitch simply highlights that an airline employee is only interested in moving the plane, when things go wrong they tend to bypass the little things like pax counts and watchlists to just 'put em on and push em out'.
Reply
Old 01-02-2010 | 04:05 PM
  #10  
flyguyniner11's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Phuz
nope but perhaps you are. How does it make any sense that intelligence lists fall to AIRLINE employees when we pay TSA to simply check that your I.D. matches your boarding pass? shouldn't it be the other way around?? This computer glitch simply highlights that an airline employee is only interested in moving the plane, when things go wrong they tend to bypass the little things like pax counts and watchlists to just 'put em on and push em out'.
its not the agents fault that they are trusted with this task and weren't at the time given the tools to do their job. how can you blame them?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DWN3GRN
Major
22
12-06-2009 04:53 AM
xfzz
Fractional
15
10-27-2009 05:37 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
IFly17
Major
126
07-15-2009 06:34 AM
CAL EWR
Major
10
06-18-2009 10:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices