Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Flight return to STL due to screening issue >

Flight return to STL due to screening issue

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Flight return to STL due to screening issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2010 | 08:45 PM
  #11  
Foxcow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by teedog
Bashing GoJet pilots.. Did you know most of the pilots there are now furloguhed TWA,UNITED,ATA,MEDX it is not the same pilot groupe that started it. And let me tell you this we all want to leave but with this economy we are screwed...



Even if that were true, it still wouldn't make it ok.
Reply
Old 01-02-2010 | 09:28 PM
  #12  
cvginsanity13's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat, On Top
Default

Originally Posted by Phuz
Pretty sad how things like this can just happen. its up to an airline employee making near min. wage to 'catch' when someone is on a list. How hard do you think it would be to bribe them? the agents pencil whip the pax count at my airline all the time, mostly because the agents just don't care about things like security. you get what you pay for.
Sorry to burst your bubble darling,

But the "easily bribed" ground crew probably make...um, scratch that- DO make more than the junior FO and FA"s so... goes to say the airlines are getting what they pay for In flight and on the ground...Imho... This security breach bs has nothing to do with pay...Honestly what meaningful anti-terrorist tools are available on the front line??? So frustrating nonetheless!!!
Reply
Old 01-02-2010 | 09:29 PM
  #13  
Killer51883's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: E-170
Default

is it the responsibility of the code share airlines (gojet in this case) to police the passengers on its flights even though they didnt sell the ticket? I kinda assumed it was the mainline carrier's problem to make sure that people who arent supposed to be on the airplanes are not on board.
Reply
Old 01-02-2010 | 09:36 PM
  #14  
cvginsanity13's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat, On Top
Default

Thinking...

The only people who really look at the pax's itineraries are the ticketing agent... and if the use the kiosk then how are they screened?? And ticketing is done "usually" by mainline. where is this "screening" coming into play???...I'm a bit dense here

Last edited by IC ALL; 01-02-2010 at 10:00 PM.
Reply
Old 01-02-2010 | 09:54 PM
  #15  
flynavyj's Avatar
Gets EVERY weekend off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: SIC
Default

the failure would be pretty large from what i can see. I'd have expected this to be caught when the individual initially decided to purchase the ticket, that ticket should have been printed with extra security screening written in bold face lettering, only to allow the person to have the ID crosschecked at security to see if the individual was who they say they are. Getting on the plane is about the LAST line of defense. We can say the "crew" is the last line of defense with FFDO, but that only works in a specific scenario. It will prevent another 9/11, but expecting a pilot to be john wayne and go back into the cabin to inspect the situation, inflight, or defuse the situation in the case of the african bomber, is dreamy at best.
Reply
Old 01-02-2010 | 10:50 PM
  #16  
Foxcow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Default

It makes me wonder what entity is the first line of defense. Does the Department of Homeland Security compare the name of a person that meets certain criteria to an array of government databases? Or at least supposed to. It seems like an almost impossible task.
Reply
Old 01-04-2010 | 06:18 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: MD80
Default

Originally Posted by flyguyniner11
are you guys missing this...they said it was a computer problem that was the cause of this..not people not caring or whatever you wanted to blame it on

EVEN WORSE! That's when you as an employee in charge of pax boarding should start caring, when computers break not when they work. But my point is that they should have used discretion AFTER they found out that the guy was already up in the air and not turn the airplane around. That accomplished nothing when the flight takes as much time to get to the destination as it does to come back. Wait Mohamed, even though we missed you on the ground can you hold off on the bomb just for a second until you come back to STL so that we can double check you???
Reply
Old 01-04-2010 | 06:36 AM
  #18  
Positive_Rate's Avatar
Sprung
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AirWillie
...All to make sure Mohamed was not on....
Originally Posted by AirWillie
...Wait Mohamed, even though ...
Ok, Einstein, unless you have super-secret inside GoJet info that the guys name was indeed Mohamed, then that's a pretty arrogant statement...both of them. Especially on a public forum. But, I'd expect nothing less. Carry on.
Reply
Old 01-04-2010 | 08:45 AM
  #19  
NoStep's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Missionary
Default

Originally Posted by Positive_Rate
Ok, Einstein, unless you have super-secret inside GoJet info that the guys name was indeed Mohamed, then that's a pretty arrogant statement...both of them. Especially on a public forum. But, I'd expect nothing less. Carry on.
Dang!! Positive-now I'm going to defend AirWillie!! Mohammed Atta, and at least 2 other 9/11 hijackers had mohammed in their names. To be fair, Willie would have been more correct to use Abdul instead, since most bad guys prefer this moniker -Richard Reid (real name Abdul Rahim), Blind Sheik (Omar Abdul Raman), Umar Faruk Abdulmutallab (Northwest bomber), etc.

So what exactly makes AirWillie's statement arrogant? Our political correctness has TSA shaking-down Granny Johnson and Bubba Smith at security checkpoints, while idiots like Napolitano and Gorelick direct them to not offend all the Mohammeds and Abduls out there...until we smell cordite wafting into the cockpit, and then our dim-wits in government will investigate how it could happen! Madness!!

Oh yeah! Has GoJet hired at least 126 furloughed pilots recently from United, ATA, etc.? Another poster stated that the "majority" of GoJetters are from there...must have missed that hiring boom!
Reply
Old 01-04-2010 | 09:50 AM
  #20  
Positive_Rate's Avatar
Sprung
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Default

Yes. I know that the hijackers were named Mohamed. And I hope they're burning in the pits of hell, but to associate all people named Mohamed with being a terrorist is stupid and uninformed. And not all people named Mohamed are of Arab decent...for instance, there was (what appeared to be) a caucasian guy on CNN over X-mas named Mohamed talking about something.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DWN3GRN
Major
22
12-06-2009 04:53 AM
xfzz
Fractional
15
10-27-2009 05:37 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
IFly17
Major
126
07-15-2009 06:34 AM
CAL EWR
Major
10
06-18-2009 10:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices