Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
UA/CO merger effect on regionals >

UA/CO merger effect on regionals

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

UA/CO merger effect on regionals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2010 | 09:43 AM
  #121  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

What happened to slaphappy
Reply
Old 05-12-2010 | 03:18 AM
  #122  
saab2000's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
For example, if CAL pilots would to fly XJTs ERJs at the payrates that XJT pilots currently get but with CALs work rules, the crew costs would be lower!
What evidence can you provide to support this claim. I honestly believe that if it were cheaper to do it in house it would never have been outsourced.
Reply
Old 05-12-2010 | 08:31 AM
  #123  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by saab2000
What evidence can you provide to support this claim. I honestly believe that if it were cheaper to do it in house it would never have been outsourced.
None other than common sense anecdotal evidence. Talk to any ex-XJT currently working at CAL and they will tell you that overall, XJT's work rules are better than CAL's. I know its anecdotal but every one of these people I've talked to say the same thing.

Anyways, for CAL, the IPO wasn't only about doing it cheaper in house. They sold millions of shares of XJT at $15 a share and made a killing while also writing a CPA on XJT's behalf that supposedly created an independent company yet had many strings to restrict what XJT could do and also provided means for lowering the cost of the CPA while holding them hostage if they didn't. And it all happened exactly as planned.

CAL made millions, the other 49% they owned, the slowly sold off to fund their employee pension fund, and they got a XJT to operate so cheap that unless block hours increase, the company loses money.
Reply
Old 05-20-2010 | 08:01 AM
  #124  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Slaphappy, I see you are back since the flaming you took on this thread. But I also noticed you still havent replied to any of the responses you got from your last post. I'm particularly interested in the reply to this. Please do so, I look forward to your insight.

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
That and CAL has made it their mission to screw expressjet at every turn and now that CAL management is taking over UAL I don’t see that changing.
Originally Posted by Nevets
Thanks in part to SKW.

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
I hate to sound like a broken record but the XJT mec made a big mistake not making a deal with skywest and allowing the buyout 2 years ago. You guys would be in much better shape and have a much better future.
Originally Posted by Nevets
The SKW deal: Close down branded and DAL prorate agreement - was bound to happen anyways; Close down charter; Transfer the 10 a/c CPA to SKW airlines; Transfer 25 a/c to Skywest airlines for a CPA with CAL; Fourlough 700 pilots (we furloughed less than half of that); Take a 16% paycut to include PBS, getting rid of our defined contribution retirement plan, and other work rule changes equal to 4% paycut in the future after they had a chance to study our contract ("to bring us down to parity with SKW pilots"); Maintain seperate operations with seperate seniority lists without the ability to bid over with a/c in case they were transferee over to ASA or SKW (same clause SKW and ASA pilots have in the ASA contract); negotiate rates for Q400s. What they offered: 15 yr CPA for 205 a/c that was going to be up to bid in 12 months; inclusion in the SKW profit sharing and performance bonus plans; preferential (not guaranteed) interviews for furloughed pilots (to fly the same a/c and routes they are currently flying but at the bottom of a non-union seniority list at first yr SKW pay).
Reply
Old 05-21-2010 | 05:41 AM
  #125  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Beagle Pilot
Good luck turning back the clock 20 years. While you're at it, also wish for a return to the day when the cabin crew members were called Stewardesses and wore hot pants and go-go boots.

I recognize those girls! They are still flying, but don't look anything like that!
Reply
Old 05-21-2010 | 05:53 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Originally Posted by Nevets
The SKW deal: Close down branded and DAL prorate agreement - was bound to happen anyways; Close down charter; Transfer the 10 a/c CPA to SKW airlines; Transfer 25 a/c to Skywest airlines for a CPA with CAL; Fourlough 700 pilots (we furloughed less than half of that); Take a 16% paycut to include PBS, getting rid of our defined contribution retirement plan, and other work rule changes equal to 4% paycut in the future after they had a chance to study our contract ("to bring us down to parity with SKW pilots"); Maintain seperate operations with seperate seniority lists without the ability to bid over with a/c in case they were transferee over to ASA or SKW (same clause SKW and ASA pilots have in the ASA contract); negotiate rates for Q400s. What they offered: 15 yr CPA for 205 a/c that was going to be up to bid in 12 months; inclusion in the SKW profit sharing and performance bonus plans; preferential (not guaranteed) interviews for furloughed pilots (to fly the same a/c and routes they are currently flying but at the bottom of a non-union seniority list at first yr SKW pay).
I can't believe we didn't take the offer, what were we thinking!? I could be making 20% less than what I do now working under inferior work rules!
Reply
Old 05-21-2010 | 01:02 PM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ColdWhiskey
I recognize those girls! They are still flying, but don't look anything like that!
that is nature's way - eyesight gets worse so you THINK they look the same!
Reply
Old 05-23-2010 | 06:12 PM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by captainchipotle
I heard mesa was so desperate to get people during the hiring spree that we had a guy get his multi in the sim. Just a rumor, but I wouldnt be surprised since I flew with a bunch of 250hr guys... ...some great, some not so great.

Actual conversation between me and my first FO:

"Hey, how are you, my name is _____, just so you know, this is my first flight since I passed my fed ride yesterday."

"Cool! This is my first trip in a 200!"
You sure about this conversation? I seem to remember that you couldn't fly "green on green." But, it wouldn't surprise me if scheduling did this. If so, then you should have refused.......
Reply
Old 06-05-2010 | 06:38 PM
  #129  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

Will SKW be calling in their favors after lending a hefty sum to UAL a while back?
Reply
Old 06-06-2010 | 02:42 PM
  #130  
goaround2000's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: ERJ145 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by F2GSuper
Will SKW be calling in their favors after lending a hefty sum to UAL a while back?
UAL is no longer calling the shots!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
skypest
Mergers and Acquisitions
38
04-20-2010 08:58 AM
texaspilot76
Major
111
09-11-2009 12:58 PM
newKnow
Mergers and Acquisitions
20
10-30-2008 09:01 AM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 08:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices