Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
UA/CO merger effect on regionals >

UA/CO merger effect on regionals

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

UA/CO merger effect on regionals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2010 | 02:35 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Default

guys guys guys...don't let slapdouche get your goat...dont let him win!
Reply
Old 05-03-2010 | 02:43 PM
  #82  
bernouli's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
I agree, united just got about 200 more obsolete 50 seaters and I doubt they want to keep them.

The pressrelase today said that most of the growth for this new airline will be on the regional level and with 70 seaters. I really hope skywest pushes hard for this flying and i think we are entitled to it with all the money and jobs we've given to united and their furloughed pilots.
shameful..............

Last edited by bernouli; 05-03-2010 at 02:49 PM. Reason: shameful
Reply
Old 05-03-2010 | 02:50 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: hmmmm.....
Default

What do you think will happen with Commute Air?
Reply
Old 05-03-2010 | 03:43 PM
  #84  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,130
Likes: 797
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by bernouli
shameful..............
Don't feed the troll, boys.

BTW, after years of observing slappy I have almost come to the conclusion that he is a bitter ex-SLC asa pilot who just enjoys stirring the pot.
Reply
Old 05-03-2010 | 05:29 PM
  #85  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Don't feed the troll, boys.

BTW, after years of observing slappy I have almost come to the conclusion that he is a bitter ex-SLC asa pilot who just enjoys stirring the pot.
Now that would explain a lot..................
Reply
Old 05-03-2010 | 05:53 PM
  #86  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Furlough/Gun Driver
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
I agree, united just got about 200 more obsolete 50 seaters and I doubt they want to keep them.

The pressrelase today said that most of the growth for this new airline will be on the regional level and with 70 seaters. I really hope skywest pushes hard for this flying and i think we are entitled to it with all the money and jobs we've given to united and their furloughed pilots.
The only pilots entitled to United flying are pilot's on the United/Continental seniority list. Every one of our furloughed pilots working for you would much rather be flying that 70 seater under a United contract.
Reply
Old 05-03-2010 | 06:09 PM
  #87  
JetBlast77's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
I agree, united just got about 200 more obsolete 50 seaters and I doubt they want to keep them.

The pressrelase today said that most of the growth for this new airline will be on the regional level and with 70 seaters. I really hope skywest pushes hard for this flying and i think we are entitled to it with all the money and jobs we've given to united and their furloughed pilots.

Dude you need to listen to yourself. I feel bad for the SKW pilots on this board because you are giving them a horrible reputation. If UAL was so against 50 seaters, why would they just sign contracts with SKW, ASA, and XJT for more of them? To replace Mesa of course, but if they didn't want any more 50 seat flying then they wouldn't have replaced this flying with 5+ year deals for 50 seaters. Also, you need to get rid of your horrible attitude toward XJT. Did they reject you or something? One week ago TO THE DAY that the merger was announced, XJT announced a new CEO who came from UAL as the VP of regional operations. You think thats a coincidence? Obviously they expect them to be a major player in RJ flying for the new carrier. You think SKW is entitled to more flying? They have the most to lose as you guys WERE the biggest regional for UAL. Just talked to a friend of mine at XJT who does MX and they just started an E-170 CBT. Again, coincidence?

So lets go over this, XJT gets a new CEO who happens to be the ex VP of United Express Ops at UAL (and bought the original 170's for Shuttle America when he was their president). One week later the merger is announced. XJT recently gets a five year contract with UAL. The combined carrier (UAL and CAL) now own 30% of XJT who is now the largest regional operator for the combined carrier (yep thats right, SKW is no longer the largest. Sorry Slappy). Finally, XJT MX recently gets handed an E-170 CBT and is told to "be prepared". Does this sound like the end for XJT and that SKW is getting more flying? As many others have said, get a clue broski.
Reply
Old 05-03-2010 | 06:12 PM
  #88  
JetPipeOverht's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Stagnant..
Default

ASA MX was given the 900 CBT's 5 years before one was on property....that doesn't prove entirely too much JetBlast
Reply
Old 05-03-2010 | 06:37 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
Dude you need to listen to yourself. I feel bad for the SKW pilots on this board because you are giving them a horrible reputation. If UAL was so against 50 seaters, why would they just sign contracts with SKW, ASA, and XJT for more of them? To replace Mesa of course, but if they didn't want any more 50 seat flying then they wouldn't have replaced this flying with 5+ year deals for 50 seaters. Also, you need to get rid of your horrible attitude toward XJT. Did they reject you or something? One week ago TO THE DAY that the merger was announced, XJT announced a new CEO who came from UAL as the VP of regional operations. You think thats a coincidence? Obviously they expect them to be a major player in RJ flying for the new carrier. You think SKW is entitled to more flying? They have the most to lose as you guys WERE the biggest regional for UAL. Just talked to a friend of mine at XJT who does MX and they just started an E-170 CBT. Again, coincidence?

So lets go over this, XJT gets a new CEO who happens to be the ex VP of United Express Ops at UAL (and bought the original 170's for Shuttle America when he was their president). One week later the merger is announced. XJT recently gets a five year contract with UAL. The combined carrier (UAL and CAL) now own 30% of XJT who is now the largest regional operator for the combined carrier (yep thats right, SKW is no longer the largest. Sorry Slappy). Finally, XJT MX recently gets handed an E-170 CBT and is told to "be prepared". Does this sound like the end for XJT and that SKW is getting more flying? As many others have said, get a clue broski.
That is certainly interesting and most probably not a coincidence but it doesn't prove any new growth. XJET won the ERJ contract after TransStates and AWAC decided against it. The fact that you guys traded CEOs doesn't mean anything, it could be for "streamlining" operations. As far as the E170, it's probably inevitable for Expressjet, you have aging and inefficient ERJs, hundreds of them. They will have to be replaced by something, at least part of the fleet. So I wouldn't call it growth just yet, not to mention no one knows how the new scope will be.
Reply
Old 05-03-2010 | 06:41 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Default

I hope XJT gets all the flying... I'm tired of not being able to get vacation here at SKW and honestly don't want to see the block hours increase anymore without hiring (which we all know won't happen). Take it. Enjoy it. Sometimes I wish the fish wouldn't always smell his paws...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
skypest
Mergers and Acquisitions
38
04-20-2010 08:58 AM
texaspilot76
Major
111
09-11-2009 12:58 PM
newKnow
Mergers and Acquisitions
20
10-30-2008 09:01 AM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 08:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices