Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
UA/CO merger effect on regionals >

UA/CO merger effect on regionals

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

UA/CO merger effect on regionals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2010 | 04:30 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: pilot
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
Do you realize the magnitude of the feed we're talking about replacing? XJT operates nearly 250 airframes for the combined carrier. We're not talking about some small little regional that operates 20 or 30 airframes here. Somebody would have to do a lot of hiring and a lot of a/c buying to replace these routes. XJT currently dominates IAH and EWR for CAL. They operate far more flights than even mainline. I guess if they tighten scope back up all these jobs could be filled by furloughed UAL and CAL guys. In the end that would honestly be the best thing for everyone.
What would be really nice would be to purchase the regional companies and merge with the mainline. No training required and service would not be interrupted. In the long term I believe it would be cheaper than outsourcing.
Reply
Old 05-01-2010 | 07:03 AM
  #42  
TrojanCMH's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
Delta is "right sizing" CVG into non-existance. It will be gone as a hub in the next year or two. The ER category will be moving to SEA in the next few months. DET is too close and a much better hub.
Now if only they could get all the ramp crews from CVG up to DTW you could pull up to your gate and park instead of waiting for 20 minutes while watching a bunch of rampers stroll by and act like its not their problem.
Reply
Old 05-01-2010 | 07:47 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rdneckpilot
What would be really nice would be to purchase the regional companies and merge with the mainline. No training required and service would not be interrupted. In the long term I believe it would be cheaper than outsourcing.
Ignoring the labor issues (company and union) with that, it makes little sense from an equipment standpoint. The 50 seat RJ isn't obsolete, but there are far too many deployed right now. In fact many of the routes probably should be back in turboprops from an economic standpoint. Why would a mainline carrier that doesn't presently share the cost of owning those airplanes outside of the length of their FPD deal want to assume the cost of owning/disposing of those birds. While they're better than the 50's, you have to imagine that the same would be true of many of the 70 seaters. If the regionals were merged into mainline eliminating those scope issues, you'd have to think that the majors would trend towards 100 seat E-Jets and the upcoming C-Series so why take on the cost of getting rid of 70's as well? If a major became interested in doing this, I think they'd just put them on mainline with their pilots. They'd probably try and recoup the cost of breaking any FPD agreement through a combination of getting labor to accept lower payrates/worse workrules on the planes and by getting the manufacturers to agree to significantly lower prices for a large mainline order. The threat of displaced feed going to a competitor and hurting you has been dramatically reduced in recent years.
Reply
Old 05-01-2010 | 09:21 AM
  #44  
Slaphappy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by blastoff
As of May 1, XJT will have 32 A/C flying for UAL...with the 10 "temporary" jets looking not so "temporary."
You can bet those "temporary" 10 planes will be gone as soon as possible, after the merger.

Originally Posted by blastoff
So you're saying that Hanley having been VP United Express and US Air Express, and the man who spearheaded RAH's purchase of E170's has nothing to do with it. Seeing as its no secret that XJT's board of directors desperately want: 1) UAL flying, 2) US Air Flying 3) E170's and you still can't see why they chose him?

He restructured a coal company and that's what you're basing your opinion on? "Specialized" in bankruptcy after taking one Coal Company back to profitability...right.
THe problem with your thinking is that xjt is a money losing operation, before any financing for any new aircraft can be secured that money losing company needs to be set back to profitibilty, the only way right now is chpt 11. You guys need to wake up and stop drinking the ALPA coolaid otherwise you will be the new comair.
Reply
Old 05-01-2010 | 10:16 AM
  #45  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
That and CAL has made it their mission to screw expressjet at every turn and now that CAL management is taking over UAL I don’t see that changing.
Thanks in part to SKW.
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
I hate to sound like a broken record but the XJT mec made a big mistake not making a deal with skywest and allowing the buyout 2 years ago. You guys would be in much better shape and have a much better future.
The SKW deal: Close down branded and DAL prorate agreement - was bound to happen anyways; Close down charter; Transfer the 10 a/c CPA to SKW airlines; Transfer 25 a/c to Skywest airlines for a CPA with CAL; Fourlough 700 pilots (we furloughed less than half of that); Take a 16% paycut to include PBS, getting rid of our defined contribution retirement plan, and other work rule changes equal to 4% paycut in the future after they had a chance to study our contract ("to bring us down to parity with SKW pilots"); Maintain seperate operations with seperate seniority lists without the ability to bid over with a/c in case they were transferee over to ASA or SKW (same clause SKW and ASA pilots have in the ASA contract); negotiate rates for Q400s. What they offered: 15 yr CPA for 205 a/c that was going to be up to bid in 12 months; inclusion in the SKW profit sharing and performance bonus plans; preferential (not guaranteed) interviews for furloughed pilots (to fly the same a/c and routes they are currently flying but at the bottom of a non-union seniority list at first yr SKW pay).
Reply
Old 05-01-2010 | 11:42 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Thanks in part to SKW.The SKW deal: Close down branded and DAL prorate agreement - was bound to happen anyways; Close down charter; Transfer the 10 a/c CPA to SKW airlines; Transfer 25 a/c to Skywest airlines for a CPA with CAL; Fourlough 700 pilots (we furloughed less than half of that); Take a 16% paycut to include PBS, getting rid of our defined contribution retirement plan, and other work rule changes equal to 4% paycut in the future after they had a chance to study our contract ("to bring us down to parity with SKW pilots"); Maintain seperate operations with seperate seniority lists without the ability to bid over with a/c in case they were transferee over to ASA or SKW (same clause SKW and ASA pilots have in the ASA contract); negotiate rates for Q400s. What they offered: 15 yr CPA for 205 a/c that was going to be up to bid in 12 months; inclusion in the SKW profit sharing and performance bonus plans; preferential (not guaranteed) interviews for furloughed pilots (to fly the same a/c and routes they are currently flying but at the bottom of a non-union seniority list at first yr SKW pay).
Kinda makes you sick to think that their are pilots that think XJT should have taken this deal. Its funny how many SKW pilots think we should have taken the deal. Like puppets.
Reply
Old 05-01-2010 | 12:02 PM
  #47  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
CO/UAL wil probably just retire 50 seaters and replace them with current 70 seaters. There is plenty of overlap and I wouldn't expect CLE to be around very long.

Highly unlikely unless they can re-negotiate the leases. CAL/UAL can't just park/retire 50 seaters without substantial penalties. The ones DAL are parking are up on the leases, and that's why they're getting parked. There is also still a market for the 50 seater. It may be a smaller market, but it still exists.

Also, it's highely unlikely that more 70 seaters will majically appear, & less likely they will all go to Skywest/GoJets. Many CAL/UAL pilots have seen lives destroyed by the outsourced flying & you can bet the outsourcing is over.

Last edited by johnso29; 05-01-2010 at 01:35 PM.
Reply
Old 05-01-2010 | 12:07 PM
  #48  
contrail67's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: 737
Default

I highly doubt if additional scope language is seen at all. Anything over 70 seats flown at Mainline. NO additional RJ's flown by the regionals is what I would expect.
Reply
Old 05-01-2010 | 03:21 PM
  #49  
blastoff's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
You can bet those "temporary" 10 planes will be gone as soon as possible, after the merger.
You're right, they'll be part of the permanent fleet.

Get used to seeing XJT wearing "your" colors. You're not the only big kid on the block anymore and it obviously bothers you.

Originally Posted by Slaphappy

THe problem with your thinking is that xjt is a money losing operation, before any financing for any new aircraft can be secured that money losing company needs to be set back to profitibilty, the only way right now is chpt 11. You guys need to wake up and stop drinking the ALPA coolaid otherwise you will be the new comair.
It all makes sense now, you're an anti-union blowhard so in love with SKW you like to stick it to everybody else for giggles. Of all people to tell us to not drink the Koolaid.

In the last 80 years of Aviation, when has profitability prevented airlines from acquiring airframes?

You see, there's no Koolaid here; it's still not a rosy picture. However, XJT is very close to break-even...still not in a great position, but better than the picture you're painting. Or, we could still be headed to CH 11, but not nearly as fast as you think and far from the only option. Interesting you bring up Comair, since the Comair strike prompted CAL to diversify its regional feed, a merger with UAL would put the lion's share of feed at both SKW and XJT, but diversified nonetheless.

Thanks for your concern

Last edited by blastoff; 05-01-2010 at 04:05 PM.
Reply
Old 05-01-2010 | 05:11 PM
  #50  
Bubba's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Crew Lounge Recliner
Default

All jets should be mainline, Turboprops with Connect, Express, or Link painted on the side should be wholly owned by the parent company. Stop the whipsaw. Train to one standard, seamless service... Novel idea.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
skypest
Mergers and Acquisitions
38
04-20-2010 08:58 AM
texaspilot76
Major
111
09-11-2009 12:58 PM
newKnow
Mergers and Acquisitions
20
10-30-2008 09:01 AM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 08:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices