Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
USAir Regional Consolidation >

USAir Regional Consolidation

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

USAir Regional Consolidation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2010 | 06:54 PM
  #31  
BlueSkiesAhead's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: On the road
Default

Originally Posted by dashtrash300
All I am saying is that PSA and PDT are wholly owneds which should entitle them over Mesa or AWAC. Just because Mesa is going down doesnt mean their pilots should get my job. Harsh I know, but it is the truth. I have already be furloughed once and believe we should get all the pilots from PDT and PSA back before we start picking up the people floating in the water.
I wonder if you would have felt the same way if RAH and AWAC didn't bail out Airways with a truckload of cash post bankruptcy and Piedmont had been dissolved or sold off to some other carrier.
Reply
Old 05-31-2010 | 06:57 PM
  #32  
BlueSkiesAhead's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: On the road
Default

Originally Posted by saab2000
The case to watch right now is Spirit. Very, very, very important case for pilots all over the nation right now. They need all our support.
I could not agree more. This could set the stage for future pilot contract negotiations.
Reply
Old 05-31-2010 | 09:29 PM
  #33  
Phuz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Kerbal Rocket Surgeon
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
From: DTW 717A
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkiesAhead
I wonder if you would have felt the same way if RAH and AWAC didn't bail out Airways with a truckload of cash post bankruptcy and Piedmont had been dissolved or sold off to some other carrier.
If Airways woulda gone ch.7 in 2003, over half of the WO pilots would have never been hired in the first place. So while we all agree that the cash infusions provided by contract carriers were vital to Airways survival, that does not mean that the pilots of the Airways WOs are indebted to the companies that provided that capital.

That said I dont think anybody really expects a staple if a WO&Contract merger were to take place. Even with a bankrupt Mesa. The staple discussion is far-fetched and silly at best.

Speaking for myself I'd like to know why PDT mgmt is asking for further concessions from our pilot group while Mr. Kirby is not willing to operate a profitable airline. If I was a shareholder in Airways and I heard the whining about how difficult it is to run a profitable company, I'd demand a change in mgmt.

Heck, I'd do Kirby's job for half the price! That's right, I'm undercutting him folks!
USAirways: Hire me at HALF that Kirby's salary AND that $2m/yr consolidation will be done in a month.

Who want's Parker's job? LoL..
Reply
Old 05-31-2010 | 10:08 PM
  #34  
hslightnin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: EMB145
Default

Originally Posted by Phuz

Who want's Parker's job? LoL..
After the mess hes made, Tilton didnt even want it lol
Reply
Old 06-01-2010 | 04:16 AM
  #35  
winglet's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by saab2000
Actually, my friend, it is kind of written that way...... Legal precedent being what it is in this country over the past 20-30 years has created an uneven playing field. Think of Ch. 11 bankruptcy protection. Most majors went Ch. 11 after 9/11 and totally shredded contracts. Managements walked away with millions in bonuses and compensation. Huge arbitrations went in favor of companies, etc.

There is very little that can be done right now. The courts are not labor friendly, to say the least. Neither has any administration in well over 20 years been even remotely labor friendly.

The best hope pilots have is the fact that there is something of period of lean pilot hiring (I am loathe to use the word 'shortage') coming over the next 5 years. Everyone knows pilot retirements will be large in number. And there are very few student pilots at the moment. The laws of supply and demand work here.

But to another subject, I can't believe someone said that 'divide and conquer' doesn't work. The situation we are currently in is exactly the result of 'divide and conquer'. Look at Comair. They were big and powerful. Then they struck. The regionals have never been the same since.

The case to watch right now is Spirit. Very, very, very important case for pilots all over the nation right now. They need all our support.
Saab2000,

I agree except for the "very little that can be done" part. Each of us individually has to keep the conversation going amongst our own pilot groups and educate the "newcomers". We can put pressure on our labor leaders to focus on the real issues affecting the industry and encourage them to concentrate on a two pronged attack: Reversing the scope relief at the majors and work on preventing the whipsaw and "undercutting" amongst the outsourced and b-scale airlines.

The Spirit pilots have the baton and are taking us all to school right now. Let's all support them in their struggle and do our small part to take control of the game. We can begin by stopping the self-pity, grovelling, and blaming, and instead, challenge each other to be a participant in the "race to the top".

winglet

Last edited by winglet; 06-01-2010 at 04:47 AM.
Reply
Old 06-01-2010 | 05:15 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkiesAhead
I wonder if you would have felt the same way if RAH and AWAC didn't bail out Airways with a truckload of cash post bankruptcy and Piedmont had been dissolved or sold off to some other carrier.
Haha got news for you. They did not do that as a favor to Airways. If they had not and Airways went into Chap 11 both would have been lost in either Chap 7 or lost hours if they had emerged if not been pulled to save cost... Parker does not want the 50 seat jet and AWAC would have had to find work real fast or fold. Plus RAH would have had as hard of a time for those E145/170/175s with scope at UAL/DAL... So please do not kid yourself.
Reply
Old 06-01-2010 | 05:35 AM
  #37  
BlueSkiesAhead's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: On the road
Default

Originally Posted by meyers9163
Haha got news for you. They did not do that as a favor to Airways. If they had not and Airways went into Chap 11 both would have been lost in either Chap 7 or lost hours if they had emerged if not been pulled to save cost... Parker does not want the 50 seat jet and AWAC would have had to find work real fast or fold. Plus RAH would have had as hard of a time for those E145/170/175s with scope at UAL/DAL... So please do not kid yourself.
I don't recall saying that they did it as a favor. Of course they didn't, it was a business decision which worked out very well for those two companies. I'm only trying to point out that these ideas of a staple work both ways. Nobody wants to be stapled when they are the one being acquired, but everybody yells for the stapler when it's the other way around. Being wholly owned doesn't exclude you from this. Don't kid yourself.
Reply
Old 06-01-2010 | 05:46 AM
  #38  
seafeye's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Hot tub for now
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkiesAhead
I don't recall saying that they did it as a favor. Of course they didn't, it was a business decision which worked out very well for those two companies. I'm only trying to point out that these ideas of a staple work both ways. Nobody wants to be stapled when they are the one being acquired, but everybody yells for the stapler when it's the other way around. Being wholly owned doesn't exclude you from this. Don't kid yourself.
It was just another form of "Pay for Training" but instead of pilots paying $25k for a job it's management at AWAC/Republic paying 25 million for a piece of the pie.
US Airways didn't need the 25million from AWAC last time but what CEO is going to turn it down? Then 5 years later that same CEO is complaining about too many 50 seater RJ's.
Reply
Old 06-01-2010 | 05:48 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkiesAhead
I . Being wholly owned doesn't exclude you from this. Don't kid yourself.
Who said I had any part of a staple talk??? There are ALPA guidelines for such mergers and acquisitions. However if you are speaking of a liquidated company the pilots do not go... Look no farther then ATA... Fedex did not take their pilots with the 757s now did they???

I'm not a fan of the staple talk. SWAPA had to be smoking something when they proposed that with F9... But a company that goes Chapter 7 has no pilots, no mainline contracts, and simply no say... But neither does acquiring their assests mean you gain their flying... Hopefully if this happens the Mainline operators will regain the flying... wild thought eh?
Reply
Old 06-01-2010 | 05:59 AM
  #40  
saab2000's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 6
Default

I don't know where the talk of stapling comes from when there is no talk of mergers, except by pilots with overactive imaginations.

It's all hypothetical.

Settle down.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mmaviator
Regional
31
04-15-2013 01:49 PM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM
UND_Sioux
Regional
133
02-27-2010 02:21 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
18
06-12-2009 04:47 AM
APM145
Regional
0
05-27-2009 05:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices