Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Prevent Whipsaw: One Pilot Group(XJT/ASA/SKW) >

Prevent Whipsaw: One Pilot Group(XJT/ASA/SKW)

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Prevent Whipsaw: One Pilot Group(XJT/ASA/SKW)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2010 | 09:03 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 987
Likes: 37
Default

Originally Posted by propilot1983
This RAH Captain in the van last week was talking about and convinced that he was going to be flying the Airbus because in the end, it's all going to be one list when all said and done. I have no dog in this fight though. Just ****es me off that this guy was willing to fly a mainline airplane for 50 seat wages.

So just to be clear, this guy said hes excited to fly the airbus "for regional wages"? Or did he just say hes excited to possibly fly the airbus? Comes across as this guy wanting to move up to the bus and you extrapolating the whole regional wage thing. Which was it?
Reply
Old 08-23-2010 | 09:27 PM
  #22  
Kramerica's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
... and based on the last union drive that failed with only a 35% in favor, I doubt that any will change their minds soon.
Remember, not voting was counted as "no", and there were many who didn't vote. I bet the percentage of people in favor of a union is much higher than you think, almost everybody I've talked to wants one.
Reply
Old 08-23-2010 | 09:37 PM
  #23  
Kramerica's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NoJoy
There is no way majority of SkyWest pilots would want to be on "one" pilot list. This topic will be revisited for the next 10 years.
While I don't necessarily disagree with you on this, where do you get this information? Was there a poll I was unaware of? I see a few good reasons to integrate lists, not just pilots but everybody:

1. No whipsaw
2. Bigger pilot group means greater scheduling flexibility
3. Greater bargaining power
4. More efficient company means more profits means more pay for us
5. <add your reason here>
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 01:59 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
You don't have any leverage, your union is ready to drop the one list anyway, they realize that this is the only viable solution. It is HIGHLY unlikely that you would get any guarantee of "future growth" whatever growth there could ever be left after the aircraft Skywest is about to acquire in the next month or so. Best you can hope for is something like ASA has that lets you keep what you currently have and not lose anything in an aircraft transfer.

Nothing says they even need to talk with you, from what I understand it is a take it or leave it deal. You say no they walk away and then wait a few months and buy the scraps in a chapter 7 sale. Either way I don't care, skywest staying independent is more important than anything else out there.

I think it’s funny that 2 weeks ago you guys were saying the one list will happen no matter what but now you've moved the goal posts and finally have come to terms with that fact that one list will not happen. What will the story be next month?

This is all happening exactly like I thought it would.
Who is changing their story? I thought this didnt involve skywest?

If you think you can just take your ball and go home then you are in for a rude awakening. The benefits for your management have been laid out in front of them and no matter what you want to believe future growth or current flying will be included in ANY agreement that doesnt include one list. No one knows if we will try for one list and potentially end the deal but if we negotiate with your management then SKW flying will be involved.

If our union was childish and ignorant like many of the posts on these forums then our leaders could have stormed out of the meeting and thrown a hissy fit. It would have almost definitely been used against us if it ever went to court. We need to at least hear the proposal before they take a stand. Any SKW pilot thinking you will still have the same prospects for future flying as you do now (ie 800 million in the bank, cheaper work rules, non-union) is naive at best. Your management wants this deal to go through or they wouldnt have tried.

You pound your chest saying how smart your management is and then play dumb when your management is about to sell you down the river. There are competitors watching what SKW is doing, we arent going to be in CH 7 anytime in the immediate future especially with the potential for a buyout being what it is, and no one knows how this is going to play out. Nothing has happened but everyone is getting ready to negotiate and guess whose pilot group is left unprotected?
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 05:53 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: CRJ CA
Default

I am for one list but for SKW pilots to ever go for it XJT/ASA guys have to be willing to protect SKW bases. Many here passed over other airlines to come to SKW in order to live where they wanted. They will be whipsawed and give up pay so they can live in base. Many SKW pilots see integration as a land grab that opens up the base they waited years to get into (or are still waiting to get into) to any senior XJT pilot who is sick of EWR. I think there would have to be fences in the neighborhood of 10 years to get SKW pilots behind a single list.
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 06:00 AM
  #26  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by rjboy
I am for one list but for SKW pilots to ever go for it XJT/ASA guys have to be willing to protect SKW bases. Many here passed over other airlines to come to SKW in order to live where they wanted. They will be whipsawed and give up pay so they can live in base. Many SKW pilots see integration as a land grab that opens up the base they waited years to get into (or are still waiting to get into) to any senior XJT pilot who is sick of EWR. I think there would have to be fences in the neighborhood of 10 years to get SKW pilots behind a single list.

Its been said time and time again. When XE did Delta Connection flying out of LAX & branded flying out of ONT those were the 2 MOST JUNIOR bases in the system. Believe if or not, most guys at XE aren't interested in West Coast Bases.
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 06:05 AM
  #27  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
We hear this same song and dance everytime there is a union drive at skywest. Skywest has been around for 35 years and we havn't been the victim of what you speak and I doubt we will ever be. Why? Because there is always the threat of a union hanging over their heads. Not having a union in our case gives us more power than ever having one.

Most pilots at skywest agree with me, just talk to some and ask their opinion of a merger with xjt and sky. 9 out of 10 will tell you they are against it, and based on the last union drive that failed with only a 35% in favor, I doubt that any will change their minds soon.
Except that there is nothing to stop management from merging Skywest/ASA/XE. It's pretty simple for them to throw you all together, and Skywest pilots have no protection against it.
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 06:24 AM
  #28  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by rjboy
I am for one list but for SKW pilots to ever go for it XJT/ASA guys have to be willing to protect SKW bases. Many here passed over other airlines to come to SKW in order to live where they wanted. They will be whipsawed and give up pay so they can live in base. Many SKW pilots see integration as a land grab that opens up the base they waited years to get into (or are still waiting to get into) to any senior XJT pilot who is sick of EWR. I think there would have to be fences in the neighborhood of 10 years to get SKW pilots behind a single list.
That's probably true. I didn't even consider most regionals due to geography.
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 07:07 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rjboy
I am for one list but for SKW pilots to ever go for it XJT/ASA guys have to be willing to protect SKW bases. Many here passed over other airlines to come to SKW in order to live where they wanted. They will be whipsawed and give up pay so they can live in base. Many SKW pilots see integration as a land grab that opens up the base they waited years to get into (or are still waiting to get into) to any senior XJT pilot who is sick of EWR. I think there would have to be fences in the neighborhood of 10 years to get SKW pilots behind a single list.
Thats easy. Make a fence so only vacancies allow for any pilot to transfer into base. If we integrate the lists by relative seniority, then no quality of life is sacrificed and we can maintain current QOL for all pilots, but allow greater flexibilty. FYI, the west coast bases would be the most junior bases as far as XJT pilots are concerned. CLE is our most senior base, IAH next, then EWR, then ORD.
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 08:52 AM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
You don't have any leverage, your union is ready to drop the one list anyway, they realize that this is the only viable solution. It is HIGHLY unlikely that you would get any guarantee of "future growth" whatever growth there could ever be left after the aircraft Skywest is about to acquire in the next month or so. Best you can hope for is something like ASA has that lets you keep what you currently have and not lose anything in an aircraft transfer.
Your management has given us leverage. Not only did they spell out all the benefits and reasons they want to buy us to the whole investment community, they told us they were willing to address our whipsaw, transfer of aircraft, staffing etc.

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
Nothing says they even need to talk with you, from what I understand it is a take it or leave it deal. You say no they walk away and then wait a few months and buy the scraps in a chapter 7 sale. Either way I don't care, skywest staying independent is more important than anything else out there.

I think it’s funny that 2 weeks ago you guys were saying the one list will happen no matter what but now you've moved the goal posts and finally have come to terms with that fact that one list will not happen. What will the story be next month?

This is all happening exactly like I thought it would.
It certainly is a take it or leave it deal. They one list or or walk away from the deal. If it was really as easy as waiting until we go bk, they certainly would have done that at best. It's clear that skw sees great benefit in XJT right now. And there are others that don't have a problem with our contract as is that will also see the same benefits skw laid out for all during the conference call.

It's skw who has moved their goal post. They announced to the whole world that hey are buying XJT, had talked to all the labor groups and that they were all on board with making this transaction happen the way they envision it. BR even answered a question on what is different now then two years ago and he said that two years ago there were "things" that were out of their control. Now when they actually did talk to our union they tell us that they will walk away before one listing us.

In any case, I've said from the beggining that I rather stay independent and take the risk of being bought by someone else then to be part of this whipsaw.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BoilerUP
Regional
103
02-26-2010 02:31 PM
djrogs03
Regional
12
01-17-2010 07:53 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
JetBlast77
Regional
44
07-19-2009 01:19 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices