Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Prevent Whipsaw: One Pilot Group(XJT/ASA/SKW) >

Prevent Whipsaw: One Pilot Group(XJT/ASA/SKW)

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Prevent Whipsaw: One Pilot Group(XJT/ASA/SKW)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-2010 | 09:33 AM
  #31  
JustAMushroom's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Capt
Default

It's funny how pilots feel like we are in the drivers seat in everything we do.

My gut tells me XJT pilots sensibilities is so far down the list of SKYW Inc. priorities that they have devoted less than a few hours to this issue. These guys are moving paper and financing deals. When they get to the issue of integration they are going to get together, figure out what creates the most shareholder value and spin it so their decision is palatable to the most number of pilots.

I say we stop this ****ing contest. No pilot wants to loose senority or get bumped from a base. I suggest we work on language to protect us from the "whipsaw" and forget about integration. If we are not careful, our XJT brothers and sisters are going to (unfairly) get the short end of the stick.

SKYW knows integration equals union and that is a tough pill for mgmnt to swallow.
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 09:42 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: CRJ CA
Default

Originally Posted by TheBills
Thats easy. Make a fence so only vacancies allow for any pilot to transfer into base. If we integrate the lists by relative seniority, then no quality of life is sacrificed and we can maintain current QOL for all pilots, but allow greater flexibilty. FYI, the west coast bases would be the most junior bases as far as XJT pilots are concerned. CLE is our most senior base, IAH next, then EWR, then ORD.
I have 7 solid friends at XJT. Every single one of them would prefer to be in SLC, COS, or CA than where they are now. Sell people on the fences but don't tell the guy in PSP that no one at XJT wants to live there because he won't believe it.
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 09:51 AM
  #33  
JetPipeOverht's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Stagnant..
Default

This thread has really gotten out of hand since it was entitled as such....Everything we've been told on the ASA side is this will be ASA acquiring Xjt and being folded in SOMEHOW...Where does Skywest enter the argument here, if at all ?
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 10:10 AM
  #34  
Slaphappy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Default

If there ever were going to be a 3 way merger which is not going to happen but IF for some crazy reason it were to happen. I think skywest bases should have 5 year fences including upgrades and transfers. I also think that since we're the acquiring company that we should be benefited with a higher percent of relative seniority. I think if xjt and asa guys get to have our bases then we should get something in return, because skywest pilots gain NOTHING from be merged with xjt or asa. We would be on the losing end of this deal any way it would go down. If those prerequisites could be guaranteed then I would be open to a merger.
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 11:04 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,302
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by JetPipeOverht
This thread has really gotten out of hand since it was entitled as such....Everything we've been told on the ASA side is this will be ASA acquiring Xjt and being folded in SOMEHOW...Where does Skywest enter the argument here, if at all ?
I agree.. A bunch of XJT pilots getting there panties in a knot... Everything our leaders put out is, this deal is only ASA/XJT... Thats it.. Move on...
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 01:25 PM
  #36  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Default

I would be open to just an ASA/XJT merger and let SKY stay out as a small regional if we get strong anti whipsaw language and jobs with jets language and a scope agreement that makes sure Comair get integrated with the new ASA when they are purchased. From what I see from XJT ALPA, this deal is going to get done no matter what, nothing hard on it, just soft language I read! I look forward to all my new base options and being on the largest regional list in the industry, Prater showing at the JA meeting at all should show that he at least acknowledges us as one of the largest groups in ALPA!
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 01:27 PM
  #37  
todd1200's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 7
Default

I'm surprised (well kind of) there is not more support for one list from ASA pilots. Not too long ago, when things were not looking good for ASA and Skywest was growing, there were a lot of ASA pilots who favored merging lists with Skywest. Now that things have picked up a bit, no one here seems to care. Collectively, we seem to have a pretty short memory.

ASA Furloughs/Skywest Hiring!?!

If ASA and Skywest Ever Merged Pilot Groups..
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 02:05 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
If there ever were going to be a 3 way merger which is not going to happen but IF for some crazy reason it were to happen. I think skywest bases should have 5 year fences including upgrades and transfers. I also think that since we're the acquiring company that we should be benefited with a higher percent of relative seniority. I think if xjt and asa guys get to have our bases then we should get something in return, because skywest pilots gain NOTHING from be merged with xjt or asa. We would be on the losing end of this deal any way it would go down. If those prerequisites could be guaranteed then I would be open to a merger.
But you've been saying this entire time that ASA is the acquiring company

Using your logic if anyone should get preferential treatment (your idea not mine, I think it should be as fair as possible for all groups) then the ASA pilots should get the hight percent of relative seniority in a 3 way merger. After all, according to your beloved Skywest management, ASA is the acquiring company.

I don't understand why you are so against a 3 way merger. You believe that Skywest management hasn't used whipsaw in it's 35 year of existence despite evidence to the contrary from ASA and XJet pilots. Even if what you said was true, the past relations is no guarantee of similar future relations and you should want your pilot group to be in the strongest possible negotiating position to deal with any BS management might throw at you. Why even give management the opportunity or temptation to whipsaw? Can you 100% guarantee that they won't? No you can't, therefore you should integrate all 3 groups.

RAH is at least doing something right with their one list approach. If they can pull off that CF of a integration, ASA/Skywest/XJet should be pretty easy.
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 02:10 PM
  #39  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by JetPipeOverht
This thread has really gotten out of hand since it was entitled as such....Everything we've been told on the ASA side is this will be ASA acquiring Xjt and being folded in SOMEHOW...Where does Skywest enter the argument here, if at all ?
Because they're an airline under the holding company that owns you and potentially ExpressJet...
Reply
Old 08-24-2010 | 02:14 PM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
If there ever were going to be a 3 way merger which is not going to happen but IF for some crazy reason it were to happen. I think skywest bases should have 5 year fences including upgrades and transfers. I also think that since we're the acquiring company that we should be benefited with a higher percent of relative seniority. I think if xjt and asa guys get to have our bases then we should get something in return, because skywest pilots gain NOTHING from be merged with xjt or asa. We would be on the losing end of this deal any way it would go down. If those prerequisites could be guaranteed then I would be open to a merger.
I definitely agree that fences should be put up to protect everyone's bases/aircraft/positions. But I don't think it should be limited to only Skywest's bases... that would be retarded.

You gain a unified pilot group with one voice that will not be whipsawed against each other every time new flying pops up.... but apparently that is not important to you.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BoilerUP
Regional
103
02-26-2010 02:31 PM
djrogs03
Regional
12
01-17-2010 07:53 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
JetBlast77
Regional
44
07-19-2009 01:19 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices