Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

New Fatigue Rules Soon

Old 09-10-2010 | 08:52 PM
  #81  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Default

So what do you guys think this will mean for hiring/recalls? Its hard enough for the airlines to keep the pilots within their rest times as is!
Reply
Old 09-11-2010 | 05:16 AM
  #82  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,114
Likes: 794
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I'll tell you guys what isn't good. They are going to allow 2 pilots on Europe flights that now require 3 pilots. They are going to allow 3 crew members on flights that now require 4 pilots. A lot of major airlines do trips to the Caribbean where one crew deadheads down to fly back and vice versa (4 pilots required). Some airlines just send an IRO down (3 pilots required). The new rules will let 2 pilots fly it. Same with transcontinental turns. It will be allowed. This will eliminate more high paying jobs thereby affecting the regionals. Just something to think about.
The possible flip side is that mandated longer overnights may require the use of two crews to cover the late pm arrival and the early am departure. We have often used one crew on reduced rest for that. Not sure how many majors use that technique, if any?
Reply
Old 09-11-2010 | 07:26 PM
  #83  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Dispatcher / Meteorolgist
Default NPRM - New FAR Sep 14 2010

14 CFR Parts 117 and 121
Docket No. FAA-2009-1093; Notice No. 10-11
RIN 2120-AJ58
Flightcrew Member Duty and Rest Requirements
Reply
Old 09-12-2010 | 02:41 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I'll tell you guys what isn't good. They are going to allow 2 pilots on Europe flights that now require 3 pilots. They are going to allow 3 crew members on flights that now require 4 pilots. A lot of major airlines do trips to the Caribbean where one crew deadheads down to fly back and vice versa (4 pilots required). Some airlines just send an IRO down (3 pilots required). The new rules will let 2 pilots fly it. Same with transcontinental turns. It will be allowed. This will eliminate more high paying jobs thereby affecting the regionals. Just something to think about.
First of all many contracts require 3/4 pilots for current ops so they won't be changing anytime soon barring another massive event.

In any case, I'm writing my congress critter about this very issue. It's one thing to do 9-10 hours block in the lower 48 where you are pretty much never more than 20-30 minutes away from a suitable airport. But a 180 ETOPS oceanic crossing when something happens to one pilot, suddenly that's a really, really BMFD.

That can NOT be allowed to happen. If it is, pilot groups with current pilot staffing required in their CBA's need to go to the mat with that issue (and not give up scope to keep it either).
Reply
Old 09-12-2010 | 08:16 PM
  #85  
STILL GROUNDED's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 0
From: Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by bravo echo mike
Here is a link to the new regs. Looks pretty good!
What doesn't look good is the fact that we can all kiss our days off goodbye. They (the companies) are not going to hire to cover the open holes in the schedule. We are going to be working more days for less pay. Even if we are guaranteed 4 hours, it's going to take 20 days to make up the minimum they need for coverage.

We are all going to be at contract minimums for days off. VERY unproductive days with fewer days for for even less pay will take the suck factor of this job up just one more step.
Reply
Old 09-12-2010 | 08:22 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
Default

Originally Posted by STILL GROUNDED
What doesn't look good is the fact that we can all kiss our days off goodbye. They (the companies) are not going to hire to cover the open holes in the schedule. We are going to be working more days for less pay. Even if we are guaranteed 4 hours, it's going to take 20 days to make up the minimum they need for coverage.

We are all going to be at contract minimums for days off. VERY unproductive days with fewer days for for even less pay will take the suck factor of this job up just one more step.
Nah. At most airlines, there's a 3.5:1 or 3.75:1 trip reg. We might be unproductive, but we'll still get paid for being gone.
Reply
Old 09-12-2010 | 09:04 PM
  #87  
STILL GROUNDED's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 0
From: Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Nah. At most airlines, there's a 3.5:1 or 3.75:1 trip reg. We might be unproductive, but we'll still get paid for being gone.
We'll get paid but that is not going to account for the additional days we'll have to be gone. We won't be flying as many hours a day, the company is not going to want to hire and train more pilots to cover the flight hours they need too. We'll be working min days off and unproductive days at that. My idea of work is not 3 hours of flight time, 9 hours of duty to sit in a hotel for 19 hours everyday only to block 15 hours for the four day.
Reply
Old 09-13-2010 | 06:04 AM
  #88  
robthree's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: 777, sofa
Default

Originally Posted by STILL GROUNDED
We'll get paid but that is not going to account for the additional days we'll have to be gone. We won't be flying as many hours a day, the company is not going to want to hire and train more pilots to cover the flight hours they need too. We'll be working min days off and unproductive days at that. My idea of work is not 3 hours of flight time, 9 hours of duty to sit in a hotel for 19 hours everyday only to block 15 hours for the four day.
Why would your days get less productive? Wouldn't that just make the company have to hire more pilots and get more hotel rooms? There is X amount of flying to be done every day. If each pilot does less actual flying, then more pilots will be needed to cover it. If they get more pilots on a daily basis by cutting days off to the contract min, then they are still paying more by hotel - and giving lots of incentive for days off to be returned in negotiations. As someone else mentioned, if the suck factor gets too high, people will walk away from the job in large numbers. Its pretty close to that point now - and management knows it.

I think things will not change very much. The company will still try to minimize their costs by flying as tight a schedule as they can.
Reply
Old 09-13-2010 | 06:12 AM
  #89  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,114
Likes: 794
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by STILL GROUNDED
We'll get paid but that is not going to account for the additional days we'll have to be gone. We won't be flying as many hours a day, the company is not going to want to hire and train more pilots to cover the flight hours they need too. We'll be working min days off and unproductive days at that. My idea of work is not 3 hours of flight time, 9 hours of duty to sit in a hotel for 19 hours everyday only to block 15 hours for the four day.
Long term, this really can't happen. How many guys would stick around the regionals or the lower end of the majors if they had to work 5-6 on, 1-2 off for the rest of their lives. Yeah all the office workers do it but they get to go home every night.

For me I need about 15 days off to break even as far as my quality family time goes. I mean ask yourself... would you really stick with a job where you were on the road 5 days a week?

The only way the airlines might get away with it would be go to outstation basing so everybody could be home each night. You would come in, do one or two hub turns and be done.
Reply
Old 09-13-2010 | 06:35 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Default

I loved this comment from the FAA PDF:

Carriers should anticipate thunderstorms in many parts of the United States during the summer months. Likewise, heavy snow in the northern parts of the country should be anticipated during the winter, and the jet stream follows basic seasonal patterns. By the same token, carriers are not responsible for air traffic delays; however, if they are operating out of chronically delayed airports, air traffic delays are clearly foreseeable.
So, while unexpected delays are allowed for occasionally, chronic extensions for known weather and ATC problems may not be allowed. We'll see how well this is enforced!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jetjok
Cargo
16
11-24-2013 04:55 AM
Naven
Hangar Talk
12
04-22-2010 02:43 PM
EWRflyr
Major
2
01-09-2009 03:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices