Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
This will open a can of worms >

This will open a can of worms

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

This will open a can of worms

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2011 | 11:14 PM
  #11  
avi8tor4life's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Left Seat
Default

Remember that your union negotiates ONLY with YOUR company. They have nothing to do with who does the flying just How it will be done.
Alpa is a tool. Anyone can purchase that tool the same as any other tool. Who ever buys that tool puts it to use as they see fit. One person uses it to build something, one uses the same to destroy something. So what's the tool for, building or destroying?

Let's also remember that the union is not to blame for a lot of stuff. We are! The MEC only had power from the line pilots. We can sit here and **** and moan about how they messed up but still we are the ones to vote them in and vote on issues the effect us. Don't blame. Get involved and actually make a difference.
Reply
Old 01-21-2011 | 05:13 AM
  #12  
bailee atr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: ATR72
Default

Excellent post avi8tor. Agree 100%.
Reply
Old 01-21-2011 | 05:28 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by avi8tor4life
Remember that your union negotiates ONLY with YOUR company. They have nothing to do with who does the flying just How it will be done.
Alpa is a tool. Anyone can purchase that tool the same as any other tool. Who ever buys that tool puts it to use as they see fit. One person uses it to build something, one uses the same to destroy something. So what's the tool for, building or destroying?

Let's also remember that the union is not to blame for a lot of stuff. We are! The MEC only had power from the line pilots. We can sit here and **** and moan about how they messed up but still we are the ones to vote them in and vote on issues the effect us. Don't blame. Get involved and actually make a difference.
I think many peoples' gripes with ALPA National is that they don't provide any pushback or guidance as an organization. ALPA will happily take on a pilot groups' dues and in turn tell them that they need to get involved.

While I'll agree with you that ALPA is a tool that is only as useful when it is adequately used, I have to disagree with you that all the responsibility lies within the each individual pilot group.
Where was ALPA National when scope was being farmed out?

Where was there stance on that?

How come they didn't threaten to expel a pilot group that was willing to trade a a short-sited pay raise in exchange overall long-term industry longevity?

I have an assumption as to the answer for the third question, and I believe that is because ALPA National will happily take dues from ANY pilot group without any type of preconditions.
If a pilot group sprouts up tomorrow willing to fly any jet for a fraction of compensation or work rules that other pilots struggle under, will ALPA still happily support this group as their growth comes at the demise of another?
Speaks volumes for unity doesn't it???
Reply
Old 01-21-2011 | 05:32 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Default

The travel changes are just the tip of the iceberg of what we are angry about.

One List.
Reply
Old 01-21-2011 | 05:56 AM
  #15  
Eric Stratton's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LIOG41
The travel changes are just the tip of the iceberg of what we are angry about.

One List.
What else are you guys ****ed off about and what happened to your travel benefits?
Reply
Old 01-21-2011 | 10:03 AM
  #16  
Boomer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 15
From: blueJet
Default

Originally Posted by TrojanCMH
I'd love to see XJT or Comair or any other ALPA regional tell their pilot group that they're all being furloughed because they got all their flying put back on mainline seniority lists.
Agreed. Unfortunately, XJT and Comair are furloughing because newer and cheaper regionals got all their flying.
Reply
Old 01-21-2011 | 01:11 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Mainline pilots decide with their management what they will or will not fly. The leftover is negotiated by the regional MEC as to pay and QOL of those scraps. I don't see the conflict especially since I'd like to see all branded flying done by pilots on the mainline seniority list anyways. That's coming from a regional pilot.
I want to see all the flying done by mainline seniority lists as well. That doesn't mean that ALPA negotiators for regional airlines want that. I'd love to see XJT or Comair or any other ALPA regional tell their pilot group that they're all being furloughed because they got all their flying put back on mainline seniority lists.
ALPA regional negotiators do not decide what flying their regional does. They have absolutely NO say in the matter. Even if they wanted to give that flying back to mainline, they could NOT because it's not up to them. They only negotiate pay and work rules on flying that mainline negotiators would not or could not scope in. I don't see ANY conflict whatsoever at all, NOTHING.

Last edited by Nevets; 01-21-2011 at 06:19 PM.
Reply
Old 01-21-2011 | 08:05 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
Default

Having an MEC officer get "hired" by management is a slap in the face to every pilot at xjt. The rest of the MEC is so disconnected from the average line pilot that they applaud this person for going over to management. Our MEC has proven through lack of communication, ignorant communication (calling us unprofessional for sick calls July 2010 and the above mentioned), and the constant barrage of information telling us how they caved to managements every whim that they do not represent the average pilot at XJT.

Heres the problem as I see it. Too many people are apathetic to what is going on. As riled up as you are there are probably 3 pilots to your one who could not care less what happens with our MEC. This is where we need our LEC's to come in. The LEC's are made up of line pilots who should be hearing their pilots opinions. If the LEC's inform and educate their respective pilots about the happenings at the MEC level I think more pilots would get involved. Those pilots then have to support the LEC in making a stand against the MEC.

I think change is coming. I like the reps at my local level and have hope that change will happen. I dont think running away from ALPA is the answer. I think ALPA has a lot to offer but having a weak, disconnected MEC is killing us. We need leadership from a line pilot who wont cheer-lead for management.

I dont want an email telling us they are upset at the loss of pass benefits. I want an email telling us they have stopped negotiating on a JCBA, SLI, and have frozen all talks over the AQP training until pass travel is settled. Not just settled but settled in a way that does not offend every pilot who has bent over backwards to provide a good product to CAL passengers.

Giving us 36 hrs to use our vacation passes in the next two weeks even though those passes dont expire till the end of 2012 is complete and utter BS. Giving us SA3 pass class on our own aircraft is completely useless due to the fact the CAL employees can simply burn one of their vacation passes and bump us. Putting us behind unaccompanied pass riders on CAL equipment while we are trying to get to work is one more poorly thought out rule. When we are traveling to move CAL passengers who is more important? Lastly this "manual fix" to move us from SA4C to SA3 on our own aircraft??? *** Why was this implemented when they couldnt even give us what they were offering. Why rush this poorly thought out, poorly implemented, and moral crushing program? Did our MEC answer this or did they give us an email patting our newest member of management on the back for his "years of service in our union."
Reply
Old 01-21-2011 | 10:57 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

This is where we need our LEC's to come in. The LEC's are made up of line pilots who should be hearing their pilots opinions. If the LEC's inform and educate their respective pilots about the happenings at the MEC level I think more pilots would get involved. Those pilots then have to support the LEC in making a stand against the MEC.
The LEC is what makes up the MEC. The MEC officers don't even get a vote. They take direction from the local council reps. They are just administrators, the chairman being the spokesperson for the local reps' mandates.
Reply
Old 01-22-2011 | 06:27 AM
  #20  
IADBLRJ41's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: 756 FO
Default

What a great idea!! Vote out a union right when a merger is starting.

Why not give them a chance and see what the deal might look like?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turbo
Cargo
9
05-18-2008 05:17 PM
MD11Fr8Dog
Hangar Talk
0
03-28-2008 06:35 AM
Old Herk GUy
Cargo
61
03-13-2008 02:15 PM
Freight Dog
Hangar Talk
2
08-30-2007 12:39 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
09-28-2005 10:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices