Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Information on PBS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2011, 05:26 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 660
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
I'm getting it just fine, and understand PBS just fine. What I'm getting at is this: If the the company doesn't build ANY 2 day pairings, PBS CAN'T award any 2 day pairings.
The company has a percentage that can not be 4 day trips. It was talked about in a previous post by another ASA pilot. Not sure the percentage but I think he said 60% can be 4 days leaving 40% everything else.

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
Yep, understand that just fine too. What I'm getting at is that PBS is about efficiency. Due to the drastic reduction in open time because it avoids conflicts, the availability of trips to trade with greatly reduces.
In theory (again just an opinion), it's still the same. The way it works is this: That trip that you wanted but was assigned to the senior line holder (even with the conflict), you'll now receive it in PBS on your awarded line. Since they can not assign a conflict, it will still sit in the "bucket" of pairings. So you still have a chance of receiving that trip.


Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
What I was saying before was that the availability to trade for those 2 days just simply may not be there.

It seems that the PBS system is pretty good that ASA went with. But the question I asked on that other board, as well on our company mssg board is this: Do the ASA guys think the way this award came out will be indicative of the way it will always be? For the junior guys that got good schedules, will it always be that way or was it a temporary thing since some of the guys senior to you were technologically deficient and don't understand the system well enough yet to exploit it?
That's to be determined. Give it a couple more months.


Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
Again, the point I made before was that even when XJT downsized, and our pairings went to crap, we could STILL trade in the LIW's to improve our lines with the amount of time created. Even if those pairings weren't there on the initial bid but were there after crew planning made them from conflict, etc. With PBS, it's gonna give what it gives, based on preferences of course. But if the company is building nothing but crap sucking candy bar pairings, the ability to improve the schedule isn't as good.

Make sense?
The last comment I have is that from what I'm seeing there is really no change to the trades, drops and open time. If you're the top 1/3 of the company you may still not receive a few trips that you want. They may be 2 or 3 days and that person may put it in the open time bucket similar to now. Although PBS has the potential to allow a schedule to be closer to what the holder wants, you're still not going to receive 100% (unless you're #1). So with that said, open time will still have stuff in it to trade out.
JustAnotherPLT is offline  
Old 01-26-2011, 05:37 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 285
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
Question about your PBS, will it let you bid a normal/non vacation line that is less than min guaranty? By, can you tell it you only want say 60hrs credit for the month?

Because in response to the guy asking you the questions about 2 days, it could run into a conflict where the PBS simply could not meet his preferences/desires and deal appropriately with his don't wants/avoids.

Some of are bases as of yet have NO 2 day trips what so ever, like ORD. EWR has them, CLE has a few. Under the current line build system, in those bases they have to mix the 1 and 2 day trip with the 4 days sometimes just to get the line value to hit the min guaranty or line divisor.

But in those bases, if all somebody wanted was 2 days trips they may never get them based on seniority, or the PBS system trying to award them but is unable because it would take the pilot below min guaranty if that's not allowed. However, due to the LIW system the pilot can now trade for those pairings since they fell into open time due to conflict. etc.
A simple answer is yes you can bid to be less than 75 hrs, down to possibly 60, still getting paid for 75. The company sets a window where they would like to see the line values. You set a personal credit threshold for your self anywhere from 60 hrs to 105 hrs. If the system hits your 60 hrs and has met your requirements then it will stop awarding trips and you are done. HOWEVER... If you are at 58 hrs and it can't find anything, either from your preference, or lack there of and all that is left, it will give you then next thing on the list, which could be a day line, but could also be a 4 day worth 22 hrs.
The devil is very much in the details. You need to be smart with how you bid. But if you get a good default bid, it's easy to build off of that for each month.
oldcarpilot is offline  
Old 01-26-2011, 07:08 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetBlast77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A320
Posts: 661
Default

Im confused as to why you would say id be better off with PBS. With our current system I do mostly day trips, am home every night, and haven't worked a weekend in the last few years. With 60% of the base above me, are you honestly telling me my QOL will be better under PBS? There is absolutely no way.
JetBlast77 is offline  
Old 01-26-2011, 07:25 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 660
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77 View Post
Im confused as to why you would say id be better off with PBS. With our current system I do mostly day trips, am home every night, and haven't worked a weekend in the last few years. With 60% of the base above me, are you honestly telling me my QOL will be better under PBS? There is absolutely no way.
If the company doesn't change the pairings, I'm not sure why your schedule would change for the worst. You'll still hold the same if not better (for you the same since you already have what you want). Seems to me everyone thinks their schedule is going to be ruined by PBS. It's still a per seniority deal. You just have control over what it can build vs. what the company builds. It's pulling from the same pairings.
JustAnotherPLT is offline  
Old 01-26-2011, 09:14 PM
  #35  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Delta Gear Slinger
Posts: 415
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77 View Post
Im confused as to why you would say id be better off with PBS. With our current system I do mostly day trips, am home every night, and haven't worked a weekend in the last few years. With 60% of the base above me, are you honestly telling me my QOL will be better under PBS? There is absolutely no way.
No, I'm not saying your QOL will be better with PBS than it is right now. What I'm saying is you'd be better off with PBS in the near future because you'll likely see a significant decrease in 2 day pairings when ASA management takes over your scheduling processes. In the future when you can't hold an entire schedule with 2 days, you can at least hold a few 2 days with PBS and then attempt to trade what's left. With line bidding, you'd never be able to hold 2 days when ASA takes over your pairing construction. You'd be stuck with an entire schedule of 4 days and then it would be up to you to trade out the entire month. I can't think of an easier way to explain this. ASA loves 4 day pairings. They will eliminate as many 1, 2, and 3 day pairings as they can and your 60% seniority will not be able to hold an entire schedule of 2 day pairings during the initial bid run. With PBS, you can get SOME 2 days and trade the rest.
RamenNoodles is offline  
Old 01-26-2011, 10:50 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by RamenNoodles View Post
No, I'm not saying your QOL will be better with PBS than it is right now. What I'm saying is you'd be better off with PBS in the near future because you'll likely see a significant decrease in 2 day pairings when ASA management takes over your scheduling processes. In the future when you can't hold an entire schedule with 2 days, you can at least hold a few 2 days with PBS and then attempt to trade what's left. With line bidding, you'd never be able to hold 2 days when ASA takes over your pairing construction. You'd be stuck with an entire schedule of 4 days and then it would be up to you to trade out the entire month. I can't think of an easier way to explain this. ASA loves 4 day pairings. They will eliminate as many 1, 2, and 3 day pairings as they can and your 60% seniority will not be able to hold an entire schedule of 2 day pairings during the initial bid run. With PBS, you can get SOME 2 days and trade the rest.
If you read what I've posted before, the same thing can happen under the line bid system. However, the availability of the 2 day pairings to trade for under PBS can be severely limited. The number of 2 day pairings under the line system can be rather plentiful.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 01-27-2011, 02:46 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
somertime32's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: I can fly.....I'm a pilot
Posts: 442
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
If you read what I've posted before, the same thing can happen under the line bid system. However, the availability of the 2 day pairings to trade for under PBS can be severely limited. The number of 2 day pairings under the line system can be rather plentiful.
change "to trade for under PBS can" to "under ASA management will"

they love the 4 day as mentioned above
somertime32 is offline  
Old 01-27-2011, 03:43 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 160
Default

Originally Posted by oldcarpilot View Post
A simple answer is yes you can bid to be less than 75 hrs, down to possibly 60, still getting paid for 75. The company sets a window where they would like to see the line values. You set a personal credit threshold for your self anywhere from 60 hrs to 105 hrs. If the system hits your 60 hrs and has met your requirements then it will stop awarding trips and you are done. HOWEVER... If you are at 58 hrs and it can't find anything, either from your preference, or lack there of and all that is left, it will give you then next thing on the list, which could be a day line, but could also be a 4 day worth 22 hrs.
The devil is very much in the details. You need to be smart with how you bid. But if you get a good default bid, it's easy to build off of that for each month.
THIS IS INCORRECT!!!!!!!!!!!! The company sets the threshold and the window (this month threshold was 85 and window was 75 to 105, cr2). Per the loa the window needs to be 30 hours and can be basically +or- 10-20 either side of the threshold as the company sees fit. YOU NEED TO BRING YOUR LINE UP TO THE BOTTOM OF THE WINDOW. All the 60 hours you are talking about does it defaults your schedule required hours to the bottom of the window. I believe the LOA says the union can adjust the window by 2 hours each direction to allow for better schedules. This month the company/union lowered the window to 67 hours after we bid. The min schedule had to be built to 67 hours for Feb.

Basically my point is you are at the discretion of the company and where they set the window. I would not plan on flying 60 hours and getting paid for 75.
selcal is offline  
Old 01-27-2011, 03:46 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 285
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
If you read what I've posted before, the same thing can happen under the line bid system. However, the availability of the 2 day pairings to trade for under PBS can be severely limited. The number of 2 day pairings under the line system can be rather plentiful.
OK XJT guys listen to what is being said... XJT will no longer be building your lines. So all those 2 days you may have now will no longer exist when ASA builds the parings. Doesn't matter if you have line bidding or if you have PBS. ASA loves 4 days unless you are in the top 1/4.
They are limited to 60% 4 days, but their interpretation of that is that is 60% for the entire company. So they see that as ALL BASES. Our IAD base has nothing but 4 days and CDOs. That needs to change on a base by base case.
oldcarpilot is offline  
Old 01-27-2011, 03:47 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 285
Default

Originally Posted by selcal View Post
THIS IS INCORRECT!!!!!!!!!!!! The company sets the threshold and the window (this month threshold was 85 and window was 75 to 105, cr2). Per the loa the window needs to be 30 hours and can be basically +or- 10-20 either side of the threshold as the company sees fit. YOU NEED TO BRING YOUR LINE UP TO THE BOTTOM OF THE WINDOW. All the 60 hours you are talking about does it defaults your schedule required hours to the bottom of the window. I believe the LOA says the union can adjust the window by 2 hours each direction to allow for better schedules. This month the company/union lowered the window to 67 hours after we bid. The min schedule had to be built to 67 hours for Feb.

Basically my point is you are at the discretion of the company and where they set the window. I would not plan on flying 60 hours and getting paid for 75.
Huh... I'm flying 67 hrs next month and getting paid for 75. Sorry for the confusion. I would think we could change this in the JCBA as Skywest now has the ability to bid down to 58.5hrs.
oldcarpilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alfaromeo
Mergers and Acquisitions
9
06-03-2014 06:13 AM
Airfix
Regional
26
11-06-2008 11:38 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
LOBO
Major
8
06-05-2008 04:21 PM
69boeing
Cargo
31
11-19-2007 10:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices