Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
First Pinnacolaba JCBA Loophole found! >

First Pinnacolaba JCBA Loophole found!

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

First Pinnacolaba JCBA Loophole found!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2011 | 06:51 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: In the doghouse
Default

Originally Posted by cencal83406
It's all about negotiating capital. The fact we couldn't use negotiating capital to protect us from FAR minimums tells me that Mesaba's mainline contract wasn't exactly that great.
You started out good, but it went downhill after that. It IS all about negotiating capital. What in our contract would you give up to have a firm 9 hours, actual rest? Are you absolutely sure that that's what you want? Have you considered all of the consequences of that action?

The real question is why should we spend that negotiating capital (and it would take quite a bit) to get this when the FARs are about to change anyway?
Reply
Old 06-23-2011 | 07:02 AM
  #12  
higney85's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,613
Likes: 8
From: Bus driver
Default

Stop the "capital swap" viewpoint. That is a mgmt tactic that they use with their own children. The point of the provision is for US. Many of the great trips (high block in short periods) run into rest issues. This provision allows pilots to have high efficiency trips and more days off with certain provisions (close/good hotel with reliable transportation, or none required).

The company cannot "impose" it, a better way to look at things is the scheduling committee can "incorporate" it ONLY if it helps and WE are OK with it.
Reply
Old 06-23-2011 | 07:30 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Doing what you do, for less.
Default

Safety and a fatigue free operation is great as long as it doesn't get in the way of making ever more productive trips. Ugh. Some people would rather do 20 hour duty days if they could get one more day off a month, but the line has to be drawn somewhere and I think 8/9 hours of rest isn't sufficient.

I mean, really, 5 hours of sleep and 14+ hour duty days? How about instead we work normal hours and negotiate that we get paid like normal professionals for working normal hours.
Reply
Old 06-23-2011 | 07:36 AM
  #14  
higney85's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,613
Likes: 8
From: Bus driver
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
Safety and a fatigue free operation is great as long as it doesn't get in the way of making ever more productive trips. Ugh. Some people would rather do 20 hour duty days if they could get one more day off a month, but the line has to be drawn somewhere and I think 8/9 hours of rest isn't sufficient.

I mean, really, 5 hours of sleep and 14+ hour duty days? How about instead we work normal hours and negotiate that we get paid like normal professionals for working normal hours.
We aren't talking about 8 hours flat here folks. We are talking 8:45 and a walk into the hotel. If you run the numbers that is many times more actual "behind the door time" than 9+ hours and a wait for the van and ride.
Reply
Old 06-23-2011 | 07:52 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Doing what you do, for less.
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
We aren't talking about 8 hours flat here folks. We are talking 8:45 and a walk into the hotel. If you run the numbers that is many times more actual "behind the door time" than 9+ hours and a wait for the van and ride.
I'm sorry, I thought you were referring to the reducible to 8 in general, not the case by case waiving of it. That, I can see.
Reply
Old 06-23-2011 | 08:17 AM
  #16  
higney85's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,613
Likes: 8
From: Bus driver
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
I'm sorry, I thought you were referring to the reducible to 8 in general, not the case by case waiving of it. That, I can see.
8 hours flat is rough. Years of that is the cause of my caffeine addiction.
Reply
Old 06-23-2011 | 09:03 AM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
8 hours flat is rough. Years of that is the cause of my caffeine addiction.
Hence the post. The ability to be taken to 8 hours for scheduling necessity shows two things: contract weakness and schedule more important than safety.
Reply
Old 06-25-2011 | 06:18 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cencal83406
It's all about negotiating capital. The fact we couldn't use negotiating capital to protect us from FAR minimums tells me that Mesaba's mainline contract wasn't exactly that great.
And yours was better?
Reply
Old 06-25-2011 | 07:11 AM
  #19  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by djrogs03
And yours was better?
Absolutely not. But I hold the Mesaba contract language to a higher standard, considering how much it was talked up.
Reply
Old 06-25-2011 | 08:53 AM
  #20  
Boomer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 15
From: blueJet
Default

Originally Posted by cencal83406
So how did the JNC and more specifically the Mesaba contract folks not see this giant Mac Truck of a loophole?
ALPA can miss a few loopholes now and then. They missed this one at Comair in 2005:

Delta promises 34 aircraft if Comair pilots take concessions.

Pay cut starts when first airplane arrives in 2005.

If no more airplanes show up, or if first airplane gets taken back, pilots go back to old contract... but not until 2007!!!

So yes, ALPA can negotiate some pretty big loopholes.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shane123
Major
15
08-08-2008 09:42 PM
de727ups
Cargo
27
04-19-2008 11:05 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
28
10-06-2007 03:39 PM
RockBottom
Major
23
02-06-2007 08:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices